Special issue: Synthesis and SYNT 2014

Special issue: Synthesis and SYNT 2014 Acta Informatica (2017) 54:543–544 DOI 10.1007/s00236-017-0299-0 EDITORIAL 1 2 Krishnendu Chatterjee · Rüdiger Ehlers Published online: 12 April 2017 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017 The ubiquity of computation in modern machines and devices imposes a need to assert the correctness of their behavior. Especially in the case of safety-critical systems, their designers need to take measures that enforce their safe operation. Formal methods has emerged as a research field that addresses this challenge: by rigorously proving that all system executions adhere to their specifications, the correctness of an implementation under concern can be assured. To achieve this goal, a plethora of techniques are nowadays available, all of which are optimized for different system types and application domains. But formal methods do not stop at the idea to verify a system to be correct after it has been constructed. Already in the early years of computer science, the desire to automate the system engineering process to the greatest possible extent was formulated. For reactive systems, this is commonly referred to as Church’s problem: given a specification over some set of propositions, and a partitioning of the propositions into outputs that the system to be designed can set, and inputs that http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Acta Informatica Springer Journals

Special issue: Synthesis and SYNT 2014

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/special-issue-synthesis-and-synt-2014-nNBu70DuVy
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
Subject
Computer Science; Logics and Meanings of Programs; Computer Systems Organization and Communication Networks; Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems; Data Structures, Cryptology and Information Theory; Theory of Computation; Information Systems and Communication Service
ISSN
0001-5903
eISSN
1432-0525
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00236-017-0299-0
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Acta Informatica (2017) 54:543–544 DOI 10.1007/s00236-017-0299-0 EDITORIAL 1 2 Krishnendu Chatterjee · Rüdiger Ehlers Published online: 12 April 2017 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017 The ubiquity of computation in modern machines and devices imposes a need to assert the correctness of their behavior. Especially in the case of safety-critical systems, their designers need to take measures that enforce their safe operation. Formal methods has emerged as a research field that addresses this challenge: by rigorously proving that all system executions adhere to their specifications, the correctness of an implementation under concern can be assured. To achieve this goal, a plethora of techniques are nowadays available, all of which are optimized for different system types and application domains. But formal methods do not stop at the idea to verify a system to be correct after it has been constructed. Already in the early years of computer science, the desire to automate the system engineering process to the greatest possible extent was formulated. For reactive systems, this is commonly referred to as Church’s problem: given a specification over some set of propositions, and a partitioning of the propositions into outputs that the system to be designed can set, and inputs that

Journal

Acta InformaticaSpringer Journals

Published: Apr 12, 2017

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off