Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Social vulnerability and participation in disaster recovery decisions: public housing in Galveston after Hurricane Ike

Social vulnerability and participation in disaster recovery decisions: public housing in... In September 2008, Hurricane Ike caused massive damages to Galveston Island’s residential structures including four public housing developments. These developments were located in neighborhoods with some of the lowest incomes and highest percentages of people of color on the Island. Four months later, the Galveston Housing Authority (GHA) decided to demolish all four developments consisting of 569 housing units due to the damages to the buildings. Today, despite federal regulations requiring reconstruction, court orders mandating replacement of the demolished units, and available funding, only 142 low-income apartments have been rebuilt. We used the social vulnerability framework to understand these outcomes through the ability of groups to shape post-disaster recovery decisions. This paper argues that one of the overlooked characteristics of social vulnerability is a diminished ability to participate in post-disaster decision-making. We found that social vulnerability limited participation through three distinct mechanisms: the physical displacement of public housing residents, the stigmatization of public housing, and the reduction of residents to housing units in the debates. There were few local advocates arguing for the preservation of public housing units and even fewer remaining residents to speak up for themselves in the face of strong local resistance to the reconstruction of public housing units or the return of public housing residents. The void of a strong and authentic local pro-public housing perspective in Galveston provided an opening for various local campaigns to claim that their desired plan benefited the poor. The disaster recovery became an opportunity to remove or reduce public housing units and therefore public housing residents. Our findings show the dynamic features of vulnerability. While static factors of vulnerability can limit access to resources for recovery, dynamic processes of social marginalization and exclusion limit the voices of socially vulnerable groups in recovery decisions and exacerbate marginalization. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Natural Hazards Springer Journals

Social vulnerability and participation in disaster recovery decisions: public housing in Galveston after Hurricane Ike

Hamideh, Sara; Rongerude, Jane
Natural Hazards , Volume 93 (3) – Jun 1, 2018
Download PDF
20 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/social-vulnerability-and-participation-in-disaster-recovery-decisions-tg41otoco4
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature
Subject
Earth Sciences; Natural Hazards; Hydrogeology; Geophysics/Geodesy; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences; Civil Engineering; Environmental Management
ISSN
0921-030X
eISSN
1573-0840
DOI
10.1007/s11069-018-3371-3
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In September 2008, Hurricane Ike caused massive damages to Galveston Island’s residential structures including four public housing developments. These developments were located in neighborhoods with some of the lowest incomes and highest percentages of people of color on the Island. Four months later, the Galveston Housing Authority (GHA) decided to demolish all four developments consisting of 569 housing units due to the damages to the buildings. Today, despite federal regulations requiring reconstruction, court orders mandating replacement of the demolished units, and available funding, only 142 low-income apartments have been rebuilt. We used the social vulnerability framework to understand these outcomes through the ability of groups to shape post-disaster recovery decisions. This paper argues that one of the overlooked characteristics of social vulnerability is a diminished ability to participate in post-disaster decision-making. We found that social vulnerability limited participation through three distinct mechanisms: the physical displacement of public housing residents, the stigmatization of public housing, and the reduction of residents to housing units in the debates. There were few local advocates arguing for the preservation of public housing units and even fewer remaining residents to speak up for themselves in the face of strong local resistance to the reconstruction of public housing units or the return of public housing residents. The void of a strong and authentic local pro-public housing perspective in Galveston provided an opening for various local campaigns to claim that their desired plan benefited the poor. The disaster recovery became an opportunity to remove or reduce public housing units and therefore public housing residents. Our findings show the dynamic features of vulnerability. While static factors of vulnerability can limit access to resources for recovery, dynamic processes of social marginalization and exclusion limit the voices of socially vulnerable groups in recovery decisions and exacerbate marginalization.

Journal

Natural Hazards – Springer Journals

Published: Jun 1, 2018

References

  • Separate and unequal: post-Tsunami aid distribution in southern India
    Aldrich, DP
  • Tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Ike (AL092008) 1–14 September 2008
    Berg, R
  • Qualitative research methods for the social sciences
    Berg, B; Lune, H
  • At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters
    Blaikie, P; Cannon, T; Davis, I; Wisner, B
  • Long-term family recovery from disaster
    Bolin, RC
  • Disasters and long-term recovery policy: a focus on housing and families
    Bolin, RC
  • Recovery in Nicaragua and the USA
    Bolin, RC; Bolton, PA
  • Urban resilience and the recovery of New Orleans
    Campanella, TJ
  • Setting the stage: how policy institutions frame participation in post-disaster recovery
    Chandrasekhar, D
  • Digging deeper: participation and non-participation in post-disaster community recovery
    Chandrasekhar, D
  • Nontraditional participation in disaster recovery planning: cases from China, India, and the United States
    Chandrasekhar, D; Zhang, Y; Xiao, Y
  • Urban disaster recovery: a measurement framework and its application to the 1995 Kobe earthquake
    Chang, SE
  • Bringing Louisiana Renters Home: an evaluation of the 2006–2007 Gulf opportunity zone rental housing restoration program
    Clark, A; Rose, K
  • Housing issues after disasters
    Comerio, MC
  • Hurricane Andrew: ethnicity, gender and the sociology of disasters
    Dash, N; Peacock, WG; Morrow, BH
  • Poverty and disasters in the United States: a review of recent sociological findings
    Fothergill, A; Peek, LA
  • Reinforcing inequalities: the impact of the CDBG Program on post-Katrina rebuilding
    Gotham, KF
  • Razing Lafitte: defending public housing from a hostile state
    Graham, L
  • Rebuilding housing in New Orleans: the road home program after the hurricane Katrina disaster
    Green, TF; Olshansky, RB
  • Impediments to recovery in New Orleans’ upper and lower ninth ward: one year after hurricane Katrina
    Green, R; Bates, LK; Smyth, A
  • Housing markets and pubic policy
    Grigsby, WG
  • The Neoliberal City: Governance, ideology, and development in American urbanism
    Hackworth, J
  • Finding housing: discrimination and exploitation of Latinos in the post-Katrina rental market
    Haubert Weil, J
  • Mitigation planning: Why hazard exposure, structural vulnerability, and social vulnerability matter
    Highfield, W; Peacock, WG; Zandt, S
  • The Katrina conspiracies: the problem of trust in rebuilding an American city
    Hirsch, AR; Levert, AL
  • Planning resettlement after disasters
    Iuchi, K
  • The actualization of neoliberal space and the loss of housing affordability in Santa Monica, California
    Kamel, N
  • Reconstruction following disaster
    Kates, RW
  • Towards a policy that supports people-centered housing recovery—learning from housing reconstruction after the Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake in Kobe, Japan
    Maly, E; Shiozaki, Y
  • Locating social capital in resilient community-level emergency management
    Murphy, B
  • Housing allowances, submarket relationships and the filtering process
    Myers, D
  • Hurricane Andrew: ethnicity, gender and the sociology of disasters
    Peacock, WG; Girard, C
  • Inequities in long-term housing recovery after disasters
    Peacock, WG; Zandt, S; Zhang, Y; Highfield, W
  • The coding manual for qualitative researchers
    Saldana, J
  • Case study research in practice
    Simons, H
  • Disaster recovery as participation: lessons from the Shaky Isles
    Vallance, S
  • Mapping social vulnerability to enhance housing and neighborhood resilience
    Zandt, S; Peacock, WG; Henry, DW; Grover, H; Highfield, W; Brody, SD
  • Interviewing. Learning from strangers: the art and method of qualitative interview studies
    Weiss, RS
  • Case study research: Design and methods
    Yin, RK
  • Will natural disasters accelerate neighborhood decline? A discrete-time hazard analysis of residential property vacancy and abandonment before and after Hurricane Andrew in Miami-Dade County (1991–2000)
    Zhang, Y