Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Laurie Rudman, P. Glick (2008)
The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations.
J. Cyranowski, B. Andersen (1998)
Schemas, sexuality, and romantic attachment.Journal of personality and social psychology, 74 5
J. Morgan, C. Tavris, Carole Offir (1979)
The longest war : sex differences in perspectiveTeaching Sociology, 6
J. Duckitt (2001)
A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudiceAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33
C. Sibley, N. Overall, J. Duckitt (2007)
When Women Become More Hostilely Sexist toward their Gender: The System-Justifying Effect of Benevolent SexismSex Roles, 57
S. Carpenter, S. Trentham (2001)
Should We Take “Gender” Out of Gender Subtypes? The Effects of Gender, Evaluative Valence, and Context on the Organization of Person SubtypesSex Roles, 45
Ann Fischer (2006)
Women's Benevolent Sexism as Reaction to HostilityPsychology of Women Quarterly, 30
P. Glick, Jeffrey Diebold, Barbara Bailey-Werner, Lin Zhu (1997)
The Two Faces of Adam: Ambivalent Sexism and Polarized Attitudes Toward WomenPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23
C. Sibley, Marc Wilson, J. Duckitt (2007)
Antecedents of Men’s Hostile and Benevolent Sexism: The Dual Roles of Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing AuthoritarianismPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33
Rosemarie Sampson (1986)
The Longest War: Sex Differences in Perspective (2nd edition). Carol Tavris and Carol Wade. Beyond Sex Roles (2nd edition). Alice G . Sargent., 11
P. Glick, S. T. Fiske (2001)
Advances in experimental social psychology
S. T. Fiske, A. J. C. Cuddy, P. Glick (2007)
Universal dimensions of social perception: Warmth and competenceTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 11
J. Sidanius, F. Pratto (1999)
Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression
J. Sidanius, F. Pratto, C. Laar, Shana Levin (2004)
Social Dominance Theory: Its Agenda and MethodPolitical Psychology, 25
C. Sibley, Marc Wilson (2004)
Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexist Attitudes Toward Positive and Negative Sexual Female SubtypesSex Roles, 51
S. Fiske, Amy Cuddy, P. Glick (2007)
Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competenceTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 11
J. Jost, M. Banaji, Brian Nosek (2004)
A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status QuoPolitical Psychology, 25
P. Glick (2005)
Social Comparison and Social Psychology: Ambivalent sexism, power distance, and gender inequality across cultures
T. Eckes (2002)
Paternalistic and Envious Gender Stereotypes: Testing Predictions from the Stereotype Content ModelSex Roles, 47
B. Andersen, J. Cyranowski, D. Espindle (1994)
Men's sexual self-schema.Journal of personality and social psychology, 76 4
S. Plous (2002)
Understanding Prejudice and Discrimination
G. Haddock, M. Zanna (1994)
Preferring “Housewives” To “Feminists”: Categorization and the Favorability of Attitudes Toward WomenPsychology of Women Quarterly, 18
S. Guimond (2005)
Social comparison and social psychology : understanding cognition, intergroup relations, and culture
Kristopher Preacher, P. Curran, Daniel Bauer (2006)
Computational Tools for Probing Interactions in Multiple Linear Regression, Multilevel Modeling, and Latent Curve AnalysisJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31
Peter Glick, S. Fiske, B. Adetoun, Annetje Brunner, Tineke Willemsen, K. Chipeta, B. Dardenne, A. Dijksterhuis, Miguel Moya, Hyun-Jeong Kim, M. Lameiras, Maria Sotelo, Angelica Mucchi-Faina, Myrna Romani, Nuray Sakalh, Bola Udegbe, Maria Ferreira, Wilson Lopez (2000)
Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures.Journal of personality and social psychology, 79 5
F. Pratto, J. Sidanius, Lisa Stallworth, B. Malle (1994)
Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67
Pam Flaskrud, Kari Dietzler, Ingrid Niehans, J. Jenkins, M. McClellan, David Rivas, A. Cobb, Richard Silva, J. Honikman, R. Grace, Amanda Casarjian, S. Lemon, D. Goldstein, Maria Wilson, Lauren Yurfest (2001)
The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory : Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism
Theoretically, ambivalent sexism maintains gender hierarchy through benevolence toward conforming women but hostility toward nonconforming women. Men have shown ambivalent sexism to sex-typed vignettes describing “chaste” and “promiscuous” women (Sibley and Wilson 2004). This study of 117 Florida male and female undergraduate participants examined whether, benefiting more from gender hierarchy, men respond more extremely. If sexism supports gender hierarchy, social dominance also should moderate ambivalent sexism. Sexual self-schema (detailed, self-confident sexual information-processing) might moderate men’s and women's hostility. Supporting ambivalent sexism theory, women's hostility targeted the promiscuous character, but their benevolence targeted the chaste character, with men unexpectedly differentiating less. Social dominance enhanced Hostile Sexism and its differentiating the two female subtypes. Sexual self-schema moderated women’s but not men’s hostility.
Sex Roles – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 21, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.