Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Helliwell (2006)
Well-being, social capital and public policy: what’s new?Economic Journal, 16
L. Bruni, L. Stanca (2006)
Income aspirations, television and happiness: evidence from world value surveysKyklos, 59
S. Connolly, S. Hargreaves Heap (2007)
Cross country differences in trust in television and the governance of public broadcastersKyklos, 60
S. Hargreaves Heap, Y. Varoufakis (2002)
Some experimental evidence on the evolution of discrimination, co-operation and perceptions of fairnessEconomic Journal, 112
L. Festinger (1957)
A theory of cognitive dissonance
A. Alesina, E. Ferrara (2005)
Ethnic diversity and economic performanceJournal of Economic Literature, 43
P. Boettke, C. Coyne, P. Leeson (2006)
Converting social conflict: focal points and the evolution of social cooperationReview of Austrian Economics, 19
R. Layard (2005)
Happiness
C. Fershtman, U. Gneezy (2001)
Discrimination in a segmented society: an experimental approachQuarterly Journal of Economics, 116
R. Putnam (2000)
Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community
B. S. Frey, A. Stutzer (2002)
Happiness and economics: how the economy and institutions affect human well-being
F. A. Hayek (1960)
The constitution of liberty
M. Sherif, O. Harvey, B. White, W. Hood, C. Sherif (1961)
Intergroup conflict and cooperation: the robbers cave experiment
C. Coyne (2005)
The institutional prerequisites for post-conflict reconstructionReview of Austrian Economics, 18
This paper argues that the social capital that comes from group identification has a mixture of effects on welfare. In this sense, this form of social capital is neither snake oil nor elixir but something in between. Strong group distinction and identification reduce the adverse impact that relative comparisons can have on happiness, and they probably help with existential anxieties. However, strong groups in this sense can also plausibly heighten inter-group animosity to the detriment of all. Whether they do, however, is likely to depend on the character of the beliefs that give identity to each group. The paper further argues that an ‘open’ set of beliefs in the Austrian or Hayekian sense are the ones least likely to spawn such animosity. In this way, the paper points public policy away from the encouragement to group formation to the character of the groups that are formed.
The Review of Austrian Economics – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 17, 2008
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.