Sequence and Phylogenetic Analyses of 4 TMS Junctional Proteins of Animals: Connexins, Innexins, Claudins and Occludins

Sequence and Phylogenetic Analyses of 4 TMS Junctional Proteins of Animals: Connexins, Innexins,... Connexins and probably innexins are the principal constituents of gap junctions, while claudins and occludins are principal tight junctional constituents. All have similar topologies with four α-helical transmembrane segments (TMSs), and all exhibit well-conserved extracytoplasmic cysteines that either are known to or potentially can form disulfide bridges. We have conducted sequence, topological and phylogenetic analyses of the proteins that comprise the connexin, innexin, claudin and occludin families. A multiple alignment of the sequences of each family was used to derive average hydropathy and similarity plots as well as phylogenetic trees. Analyses of the data generated led to the following evolutionary and functional suggestions: (1) In all four families, the most conserved regions of the proteins from each family are the four TMSs although the extracytoplasmic loops between TMSs 1 and 2, and TMSs 3 and 4 are usually well conserved. (2) The phylogenetic trees revealed sets of orthologues except for the innexins where phylogeny primarily reflects organismal source, probably due to a lack of relevant organismal sequence data. (3) The two halves of the connexins exhibit similarities suggesting that they were derived from a common origin by an internal gene duplication event. (4) Conserved cysteyl residues in the connexins and innexins may point to a similar extracellular structure involved in the docking of hemichannels to create intercellular communication channels. (5) We suggest a similar role in homomeric interactions for conserved extracellular residues in the claudins and occludins. The lack of sequence or motif similarity between the four different families indicates that, if they did evolve from a common ancestral gene, they have diverged considerably to fulfill separate, novel functions. We suggest that internal duplication was a general evolutionary strategy used to generate new families of channels and junctions with unique functions. These findings and suggestions should serve as guides for future studies concerning the structures, functions and evolutionary origins of junctional proteins. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Journal of Membrane Biology Springer Journals

Sequence and Phylogenetic Analyses of 4 TMS Junctional Proteins of Animals: Connexins, Innexins, Claudins and Occludins

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/sequence-and-phylogenetic-analyses-of-4-tms-junctional-proteins-of-eXgjLAcqsj
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
Subject
Philosophy
ISSN
0022-2631
eISSN
1432-1424
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00232-003-2026-8
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Connexins and probably innexins are the principal constituents of gap junctions, while claudins and occludins are principal tight junctional constituents. All have similar topologies with four α-helical transmembrane segments (TMSs), and all exhibit well-conserved extracytoplasmic cysteines that either are known to or potentially can form disulfide bridges. We have conducted sequence, topological and phylogenetic analyses of the proteins that comprise the connexin, innexin, claudin and occludin families. A multiple alignment of the sequences of each family was used to derive average hydropathy and similarity plots as well as phylogenetic trees. Analyses of the data generated led to the following evolutionary and functional suggestions: (1) In all four families, the most conserved regions of the proteins from each family are the four TMSs although the extracytoplasmic loops between TMSs 1 and 2, and TMSs 3 and 4 are usually well conserved. (2) The phylogenetic trees revealed sets of orthologues except for the innexins where phylogeny primarily reflects organismal source, probably due to a lack of relevant organismal sequence data. (3) The two halves of the connexins exhibit similarities suggesting that they were derived from a common origin by an internal gene duplication event. (4) Conserved cysteyl residues in the connexins and innexins may point to a similar extracellular structure involved in the docking of hemichannels to create intercellular communication channels. (5) We suggest a similar role in homomeric interactions for conserved extracellular residues in the claudins and occludins. The lack of sequence or motif similarity between the four different families indicates that, if they did evolve from a common ancestral gene, they have diverged considerably to fulfill separate, novel functions. We suggest that internal duplication was a general evolutionary strategy used to generate new families of channels and junctions with unique functions. These findings and suggestions should serve as guides for future studies concerning the structures, functions and evolutionary origins of junctional proteins.

Journal

The Journal of Membrane BiologySpringer Journals

Published: Sep 18, 2003

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off