Sensitivity of leaf chlorophyll empirical estimators obtained at Sentinel-2 spectral resolution for different canopy structures

Sensitivity of leaf chlorophyll empirical estimators obtained at Sentinel-2 spectral resolution... A comparison of the sensitivity of canopy scale estimators of leaf chlorophyll, obtainable with Sentinel-2 spectral resolution, to soil, canopy and leaf mesophyll factors, was addressed. The analysis of a synthetic dataset, generated simulating the reflectance in the 1–4 LAI range of canopies for the main general classes of leaf inclination (i.e. erectophile, plagiophile, spherical, planophile and extremophile) and for different soil types was used for such a purpose. The synthetic dataset was obtained using the PROSPECT5-4SAIL model in the direct mode with a large variety of soil backgrounds. Additionally an experimental dataset including airborne hyperspectral data gathered during ESA (European Space Agency) campaigns SPARC and AGRISAR, was employed to simulate Sentinel-2 spectral and spatial resolution, to confirm model results. Analysis of the synthetic and experimental datasets indicated that: (i) the CVI (Chlorophyll Vegetation Index), relying only on visible and NIR (Near Infra-Red) bands and obtainable at 10 m spatial resolution, can be used as leaf chlorophyll estimator, at growth stages suitable for nitrogen fertilizer topdressings, for all canopy structures except for erectophile canopies; (ii) better results can be obtained by using different indices for different leaf architectures, with TCI/OSAVI (Triangular Chlorophyll Index/Optimized Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index) performing better for erectophile canopies, whereas MTCI (MERIS Terrestrial Chlorophyll Index) provides better results for planophile canopies, despite the fact that these indices require bands obtainable at 20 m spatial resolution from Sentinel-2 data. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Precision Agriculture Springer Journals

Sensitivity of leaf chlorophyll empirical estimators obtained at Sentinel-2 spectral resolution for different canopy structures

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/sensitivity-of-leaf-chlorophyll-empirical-estimators-obtained-at-e67puaAF0u
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by Springer Science+Business Media New York
Subject
Life Sciences; Agriculture; Soil Science & Conservation; Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry; Statistics for Engineering, Physics, Computer Science, Chemistry and Earth Sciences; Atmospheric Sciences
ISSN
1385-2256
eISSN
1573-1618
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11119-015-9424-7
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

A comparison of the sensitivity of canopy scale estimators of leaf chlorophyll, obtainable with Sentinel-2 spectral resolution, to soil, canopy and leaf mesophyll factors, was addressed. The analysis of a synthetic dataset, generated simulating the reflectance in the 1–4 LAI range of canopies for the main general classes of leaf inclination (i.e. erectophile, plagiophile, spherical, planophile and extremophile) and for different soil types was used for such a purpose. The synthetic dataset was obtained using the PROSPECT5-4SAIL model in the direct mode with a large variety of soil backgrounds. Additionally an experimental dataset including airborne hyperspectral data gathered during ESA (European Space Agency) campaigns SPARC and AGRISAR, was employed to simulate Sentinel-2 spectral and spatial resolution, to confirm model results. Analysis of the synthetic and experimental datasets indicated that: (i) the CVI (Chlorophyll Vegetation Index), relying only on visible and NIR (Near Infra-Red) bands and obtainable at 10 m spatial resolution, can be used as leaf chlorophyll estimator, at growth stages suitable for nitrogen fertilizer topdressings, for all canopy structures except for erectophile canopies; (ii) better results can be obtained by using different indices for different leaf architectures, with TCI/OSAVI (Triangular Chlorophyll Index/Optimized Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index) performing better for erectophile canopies, whereas MTCI (MERIS Terrestrial Chlorophyll Index) provides better results for planophile canopies, despite the fact that these indices require bands obtainable at 20 m spatial resolution from Sentinel-2 data.

Journal

Precision AgricultureSpringer Journals

Published: Dec 22, 2015

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off