To compare a semi-automatic software tool for the measurement of aortic annulus dimensions with manual measurements by expert readers and to analyze whether and to what extent interchangeability exists between semi-automatic and manual measurements. We retrospectively included 374 consecutive patients with high-grade aortic stenosis who had undergone CT-angiography of the heart prior to trans-catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). In independent analyses, two expert readers manually measured aortic annulus dimensions (long axis, short axis, circumference, area) as well as the distance of the coronary ostia from the annulus plane. A third independent reader performed annulus evaluation using a software tool for semi-automatic detection and measurement of the annulus plane. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland–Altman analysis was used to compare both manual measurements as well as manual and semi-automatic measurements of annulus parameters. Using the respective measurements we simulated size selection for a Sapien XT transcatheter heart valve (THV). Interchangeability of methods was addressed by calculation of the estimated individual equivalence index γ. There was excellent agreement between both expert observers in manual measurements of the annulus with ICC’s in the range 0.89–0.94 for all anatomic parameters. Similar high agreements were observed between semi-automatic and manual measurements, with ICC’s in the range of 0.89–0.95. THV size recommendation based on manual versus semiautomatic measurements agreed in 80.7% of cases while agreement between both expert readers concerning THV size recommendation was 80.6%. Semi-automatic measurements of anatomic parameters of the aortic root show high agreement and interchangeability with manual measurements in CT-angiography prior to TAVR.
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 5, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera