Seabed images versus corer sampling: a comparison of two quantitative approaches for the analysis of marine benthic communities in the southern Weddell Sea (Southern Ocean)

Seabed images versus corer sampling: a comparison of two quantitative approaches for the analysis... Corer sampling and seabed imaging are two quantitative approaches used to investigate benthic fauna. Despite the complementary nature of these methods, very few studies have been done using both in parallel. Here, we compare benthic composition and abundance data derived from the quantitative faunistic analysis of both multibox corer samples (MBC) and seabed images (SBI) taken concomitantly at 16 stations in the Filchner–Ronne region of the southern Weddell Sea (Southern Ocean) during R/V Polarstern cruise PS82 (ANT-XXIX/9) in 2013/14. A total of 43 benthic taxa were found, 34 in MBC and 29 in SBI samples. Mean benthic abundance derived from MBC was 20 times higher than the SBI abundance (1708 vs. 71 ind m−2)—best explained by SBI being a method focusing on the epifauna alone, whereas MBC also captures the more abundant infauna. Differences in taxa caught by both gears demonstrated that MBC alone were not sufficient for a comprehensive representation of the entire benthic fauna. The among-station similarity patterns derived from both methods correlated significantly; a different combination of taxa best explained the specific distribution patterns. Overall, our results demonstrate similar and comparable spatial distribution patterns in the benthic communities by both methods. We therefore highly recommend the use of both, MBC and SBI in combination. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Polar Biology Springer Journals

Seabed images versus corer sampling: a comparison of two quantitative approaches for the analysis of marine benthic communities in the southern Weddell Sea (Southern Ocean)

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/seabed-images-versus-corer-sampling-a-comparison-of-two-quantitative-yvKfhQDm0o
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by The Author(s)
Subject
Life Sciences; Ecology; Oceanography; Microbiology; Plant Sciences; Zoology
ISSN
0722-4060
eISSN
1432-2056
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00300-017-2211-3
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Corer sampling and seabed imaging are two quantitative approaches used to investigate benthic fauna. Despite the complementary nature of these methods, very few studies have been done using both in parallel. Here, we compare benthic composition and abundance data derived from the quantitative faunistic analysis of both multibox corer samples (MBC) and seabed images (SBI) taken concomitantly at 16 stations in the Filchner–Ronne region of the southern Weddell Sea (Southern Ocean) during R/V Polarstern cruise PS82 (ANT-XXIX/9) in 2013/14. A total of 43 benthic taxa were found, 34 in MBC and 29 in SBI samples. Mean benthic abundance derived from MBC was 20 times higher than the SBI abundance (1708 vs. 71 ind m−2)—best explained by SBI being a method focusing on the epifauna alone, whereas MBC also captures the more abundant infauna. Differences in taxa caught by both gears demonstrated that MBC alone were not sufficient for a comprehensive representation of the entire benthic fauna. The among-station similarity patterns derived from both methods correlated significantly; a different combination of taxa best explained the specific distribution patterns. Overall, our results demonstrate similar and comparable spatial distribution patterns in the benthic communities by both methods. We therefore highly recommend the use of both, MBC and SBI in combination.

Journal

Polar BiologySpringer Journals

Published: Oct 22, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off