Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Borella, B. Muckherjee (1995)
A reservation-based multicasting protocol for WDM local lightwave networksProceedings IEEE International Conference on Communications ICC '95, 2
(1992)
She worked with Drs. Harry Perros and George Rouskas on multipoint communication support in optical networks. She received a Master's of Computer Science degree in December of
(1989)
Rouskas received the Diploma in Electrical Engineering from the National Technical University of Athens (NTUA)
(1997)
Sivaraman: Pack et scheduling in broadcast WDM networks with arbitrary transceiver tuning latencies
(1997)
Scheduling of multicast tra c in tunable receiver WDM networks with non-negligible tuning latencies, Proc
(1997)
Multi-destination communication over tunable-receiver singlehop WDM networks
(1997)
Per - ros : Scheduling of multicast tra c in tunablereceiver WDM networks with nonnegligibletuning latencies
G. Rouskas, V. Sivaraman (1997)
Packet scheduling in broadcast WDM networks with arbitrary transceiver tuning latenciesIEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 5
(1996)
PERROS bandwidth-limited optical broadcast networks with uniform traac
(1997)
Ammar: Multidestination communication over tunablereceiver single-hop WDM networks
Z. Ortiz, G. Rouskas, H. Perros (1997)
Scheduling of multicast traffic in tunable-receiver WDM networks with non-negligible tuning latencies
M. Azizoglu, R. Barry, A. Mokhtar (1996)
Impact of Tuning Delay on the Performance of Bandwidth-Limited Optical Broadcast Networks with Uniform TrafficIEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 14
(1997)
Special issue on network support for multipoint communication
M. Borella, B. Mukherjee (1995)
Efficient scheduling of nonuniform packet traffic in a WDM/TDM local lightwave network with arbitrary transceiver tuning latenciesProceedings of INFOCOM'95, 1
Michael Borellay (1996)
Eecient Scheduling of Nonuniform Packet Traac in a Wdm/tdm Local Lightwave Network with Arbitrary Tranceiver Tuning Latencies
Impact of tuning delay on the performance of Table II
Special Issue on Protocols and Architectures for Next Generation Optical WDM Networks, and is on the editorial board of the Optical Networks Magazine
(1975)
Perros received the B.Sc. degree in Mathematics in 1970 from Athens University
(1997)
Perros: Scheduling of multicast traac in tunablereceiver WDM networks with non-negligible tuning latencies
(1997)
S
V. Sivaraman, G. N. Rouskas (1997)
Proc. of INFOCOM '97
V. Sivaraman, G. Rouskas (1997)
HiPeR-l: a high performance reservation protocol with look-ahead for broadcast WDM networksProceedings of INFOCOM '97, 3
(1997)
IEEE
G. Rouskas, M. Ammar (1997)
ROUSKAS AND AMMAR: MULTI-DESTINATION COMMUNICATION OVER TUNABLE-RECEIVER SINGLE-HOP WDM NETWORKS 1 Multi-Destination Communication Over Tunable-Receiver Single-Hop WDM Networks
Gerard Pieris, G. Sasaki (1994)
Scheduling transmissions in WDM broadcast-and-select networksIEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 2
(1995)
Mukherjee : A reservationbased multicasting protocol for WDM locallightwave networks
Rouskas : HiPeR` : A High Performance Reservation protocol with ` ookahead for broadcast WDM networks
This paper studies the performance of various strategies for scheduling a combined load of unicast and multicast traffic in a broadcast WDM network. The performance measure of interest is schedule length, which directly affects both aggregate network throughput and average packet delay. Three different scheduling strategies are presented, namely: separate scheduling of unicast and multicast traffic, treating multicast traffic as a number of unicast messages, and treating unicast traffic as multicasts of size one. A lower bound on the schedule length for each strategy is first obtained. Subsequently, the strategies are compared against each other using extensive simulation experiments in order to establish the regions of operation, in terms of a number of relevant system parameters, for which each strategy performs best. Our main conclusions are as follows. Multicast traffic can be treated as unicast traffic, by replicating all multicast packets, under very limited circumstances. On the other hand, treating unicast traffic as a special case of multicast traffic with a group of size 1, produces short schedules in most cases. Alternatively, scheduling and transmitting each traffic component separately is also a good choice.
Photonic Network Communications – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 8, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.