“Revise before review; Reject without review; Reject after review”: why manuscripts are rejected

“Revise before review; Reject without review; Reject after review”: why manuscripts are rejected Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine (2018) 41:3–5 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-018-0615-1 EDITORIAL “Revise before review; Reject without review; Reject after review”: why manuscripts are rejected Martin Caon Published online: 9 January 2018 © Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine 2018 Often the peer review process progresses smoothly through to adjudicate a difference of opinion between a reviewer and the steps: A new manuscript is submitted; appropriate the authors (not an unknown occurrence) then the manu- reviewers are identified, invited and promptly accept; they script would be sent to additional reviewers, or an editorial provide a report that arrives on time recommending major board member accompanied by a note that makes it clear revisions; the authors thoughtfully revise their manuscript that an adjudication opinion is being requested. The authors to the satisfaction of the reviewers so that the revised manu- of a manuscript that is rejected before or after adjudication script may be accepted after some additional minor revision. are of course free to submit it elsewhere. The reviewer of However, sometimes the reviewers’ opinions will diverge, a manuscript that is published despite their review recom- with one recommending minor revision with the other rec- mendation is at liberty, and indeed encouraged, http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Springer Journals

“Revise before review; Reject without review; Reject after review”: why manuscripts are rejected

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/revise-before-review-reject-without-review-reject-after-review-why-cntQiHVsH0
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine
Subject
Biomedicine; Biomedicine, general; Biological and Medical Physics, Biophysics; Medical and Radiation Physics; Biomedical Engineering
ISSN
0158-9938
eISSN
1879-5447
D.O.I.
10.1007/s13246-018-0615-1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine (2018) 41:3–5 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-018-0615-1 EDITORIAL “Revise before review; Reject without review; Reject after review”: why manuscripts are rejected Martin Caon Published online: 9 January 2018 © Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine 2018 Often the peer review process progresses smoothly through to adjudicate a difference of opinion between a reviewer and the steps: A new manuscript is submitted; appropriate the authors (not an unknown occurrence) then the manu- reviewers are identified, invited and promptly accept; they script would be sent to additional reviewers, or an editorial provide a report that arrives on time recommending major board member accompanied by a note that makes it clear revisions; the authors thoughtfully revise their manuscript that an adjudication opinion is being requested. The authors to the satisfaction of the reviewers so that the revised manu- of a manuscript that is rejected before or after adjudication script may be accepted after some additional minor revision. are of course free to submit it elsewhere. The reviewer of However, sometimes the reviewers’ opinions will diverge, a manuscript that is published despite their review recom- with one recommending minor revision with the other rec- mendation is at liberty, and indeed encouraged,

Journal

Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in MedicineSpringer Journals

Published: Jan 9, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off