Retrospective evaluation of data-limited fisheries: a case from Hong Kong

Retrospective evaluation of data-limited fisheries: a case from Hong Kong This study reconstructs the likely historical changes of the data-limited Hong Kong’s inshore fisheries and evaluates their probable effects on the marine ecosystem, based on multiple information sources. Local knowledge on changes in the fisheries and the marine ecosystem is collected from commercial fishers, recreational divers and fishery officials. We combine this knowledge with results from simulation modelling and information from published and unpublished literature and reports to generate hypotheses on the historical changes in the fisheries and ecosystem between 1950 and 2000. The analyses suggest that traditionally targeted fishes had already been over-exploited by the 1970s, following a rapid drop in catch per unit effort in the 1960s. This paralleled a dramatic expansion of fishing effort. Ecosystem structure shifted as the large predatory species became depleted and small fishes and benthic invertebrates gained dominance. High demand for small fishes as fish-feed for aquaculture farms, high market price of benthic knowledge from resource users and managers provided an important, sometimes the sole, source of information to understand the fishery (Johannes, 1998; Johannes et al., 2000). In this study, we demonstrated that the use of the best available information obtained from limited landings and effort statistics, expert knowledge from resource users and managers, andÆresults from simulation modelling, provided informative qualitative and, to a certain degree, quantitative descriptions of fishery development, contributing to an understanding of fishery history and identification of management challenges. Caution is urged since the approach is based heavily on a number of assumptions that need to be carefully validated. We assumed that the interviews provided an unbiased description of the changes in fisheries and the marine ecosystem. However, psychological studies have suggested that autobiographic memory - memory that is specific, personal, and long-lasting, and usually of significance to the self-system (e.g., Thompson et al., 1996) – could be biased as a result of affective association. For instance, study on university students’ abilities to recall the grades they obtained in various subjects during high schools generally showed that memory was best for experiences that were affectively pleasant, intermediate for experiences that are unpleasant, and worst for experiences that are neutral (Koch, 1930; Waters and Leeper 1936; Thompson, 1985; Bahrick et al., 1996). Moreover, the ability to recall autobiographical memory was shown to decline with age, particularly when the events occurred in the distant past (Pascale et al., 2002). The interviewees’ memories on past marine resource abundance were generally autobiographic memory and might have affectively associated the past with the most productive years of their fishing experience. Thus the description of the past they provided might be positively biased. Information and descriptions from other independent sources help to assess the validity of the interview data and in the present study, information from different sources seemed to converge. However, future studies on autographic memory of fishers’ fishing experience could enhance the validity of the approach. The approach described in this paper is useful in retrospective analysis and diagnosis of a fishery in a data-sparse condition. However, more conventional fishery data and analytical tools may be required for fine-tuning future management and there is little substitute for regular fishery monitoring. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries Springer Journals

Retrospective evaluation of data-limited fisheries: a case from Hong Kong

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/retrospective-evaluation-of-data-limited-fisheries-a-case-from-hong-z9HrDDSQtC
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by Springer
Subject
Life Sciences; Freshwater & Marine Ecology; Zoology
ISSN
0960-3166
eISSN
1573-5184
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11160-004-5422-y
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This study reconstructs the likely historical changes of the data-limited Hong Kong’s inshore fisheries and evaluates their probable effects on the marine ecosystem, based on multiple information sources. Local knowledge on changes in the fisheries and the marine ecosystem is collected from commercial fishers, recreational divers and fishery officials. We combine this knowledge with results from simulation modelling and information from published and unpublished literature and reports to generate hypotheses on the historical changes in the fisheries and ecosystem between 1950 and 2000. The analyses suggest that traditionally targeted fishes had already been over-exploited by the 1970s, following a rapid drop in catch per unit effort in the 1960s. This paralleled a dramatic expansion of fishing effort. Ecosystem structure shifted as the large predatory species became depleted and small fishes and benthic invertebrates gained dominance. High demand for small fishes as fish-feed for aquaculture farms, high market price of benthic knowledge from resource users and managers provided an important, sometimes the sole, source of information to understand the fishery (Johannes, 1998; Johannes et al., 2000). In this study, we demonstrated that the use of the best available information obtained from limited landings and effort statistics, expert knowledge from resource users and managers, andÆresults from simulation modelling, provided informative qualitative and, to a certain degree, quantitative descriptions of fishery development, contributing to an understanding of fishery history and identification of management challenges. Caution is urged since the approach is based heavily on a number of assumptions that need to be carefully validated. We assumed that the interviews provided an unbiased description of the changes in fisheries and the marine ecosystem. However, psychological studies have suggested that autobiographic memory - memory that is specific, personal, and long-lasting, and usually of significance to the self-system (e.g., Thompson et al., 1996) – could be biased as a result of affective association. For instance, study on university students’ abilities to recall the grades they obtained in various subjects during high schools generally showed that memory was best for experiences that were affectively pleasant, intermediate for experiences that are unpleasant, and worst for experiences that are neutral (Koch, 1930; Waters and Leeper 1936; Thompson, 1985; Bahrick et al., 1996). Moreover, the ability to recall autobiographical memory was shown to decline with age, particularly when the events occurred in the distant past (Pascale et al., 2002). The interviewees’ memories on past marine resource abundance were generally autobiographic memory and might have affectively associated the past with the most productive years of their fishing experience. Thus the description of the past they provided might be positively biased. Information and descriptions from other independent sources help to assess the validity of the interview data and in the present study, information from different sources seemed to converge. However, future studies on autographic memory of fishers’ fishing experience could enhance the validity of the approach. The approach described in this paper is useful in retrospective analysis and diagnosis of a fishery in a data-sparse condition. However, more conventional fishery data and analytical tools may be required for fine-tuning future management and there is little substitute for regular fishery monitoring.

Journal

Reviews in Fish Biology and FisheriesSpringer Journals

Published: Mar 30, 2005

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off