Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
WW Seeley, V Menon, AF Schatzberg, J Keller, GH Glover, H Kenna, AL Reiss, MD Greicius (2007)
dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive controlJ Neurosci, 27
DR Mandel (2003)
Counterfactuals, emotion, and contextCognit Emot, 17
M Zeelenberg, WW Van Dijk, AS Manstead (1998)
Reconsidering the relation between regret and responsibilityOrg Behav Hum Decis Process, 74
P Apicella, T Ljungberg, E Scarnati, W Schultz (1991)
Responses to reward in monkey dorsal and ventral striatumExp Brain Res, 85
GW Humphreys, J Sui (2016)
Attentional control and the self: The Self-Attention Network (SAN)Front Psychol, 6
RD Rogers, N Ramnani, C Mackay, JL Wilson, P Jezzard, CS Carter, SM Smith (2004)
Distinct portions of anterior cingulate cortex and medial prefrontal cortex are activated by reward processing in separable phases of decision-making cognitionBiol Psychiatry, 55
NJ Roese (1994)
The functional basis of counterfactual thinkingJ Personal Soc Psychol, 66
B Mellers (2000)
Choice and the relative pleasure of consequencesPsychol Bull, 126
LD Ordóñez, T Connolly (2000)
Regret and responsibility: a reply to Zeelenberg et al. (1998)Org Behav Hum Decis Process, 81
K Izuma, DN Saito, N Sadato (2008)
Processing of social and monetary rewards in the human striatumNeuron, 58
B Güroğlu, dBW Van, SA Rombouts, EA Crone (2010)
Unfair? It depends: neural correlates of fairness in social contextSoc Cognit Affect Neurosci, 5
A Nicolle, DR Bach, C Frith, RJ Dolan (2011)
Amygdala involvement in self-blame regretSoc Neurosci, 6
J Ashburner, KJ Friston (2005)
Unified segmentationNeuroimage, 26
C Civai, C Crescentini, A Rustichini, RI Rumiati (2012)
Equality versus self-interest in the brain: differential roles of anterior insula and medial prefrontal cortexNeuroimage, 62
LJ Chang, AG Sanfey (2013)
Great expectations: neural computations underlying the use of social norms in decision-makingSoc Cognit Affect Neurosci, 8
Z Liu, L Li, L Zheng, Z Hu, ID Roberts, X Guo, G Yang (2016)
The neural basis of regret and relief during a sequential risk-taking taskNeuroscience, 327
M Zeelenberg, R Pieters (1999)
Comparing service delivery to what might have been behavioral responses to regret and disappointmentJ Serv Res, 2
KD Markman, I Gavanski, SJ Sherman, MN McMullen (1993)
The mental simulation of better and worse possible worldsJ Exp Soc Psychol, 29
N Camille, VA Pironti, CM Dodds, MR Aitken, TW Robbins, L Clark (2010)
Striatal sensitivity to personal responsibility in a regret-based decision-making taskCognit Affect Behav Neurosci, 10
NJ Roese (1997)
Counterfactual thinkingPsychol Bull, 121
G Coricelli, HD Critchley, M Joffily, JP O’Doherty, A Sirigu, RJ Dolan (2005)
Regret and its avoidance: a neuroimaging study of choice behaviorNat Neurosci, 8
H Wu, Y Luo, C Feng (2016)
Neural signatures of social conformity: a coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studiesNeurosci Biobehav Rev, 71
T Xiang, T Lohrenz, PR Montague (2013)
Computational substrates of norms and their violations during social exchangeJ Neurosci, 33
T Connolly, LD Ordóñez, R Coughlan (1997)
Regret and responsibility in the evaluation of decision outcomesOrgan Behav Hum Decis Process, 70
S Brassen, M Gamer, J Peters, S Gluth (2012)
Don’t look back in anger! Responsiveness to missed chances in successful and nonsuccessful agingScience, 336
PVS Chandrasekhar, CM Capra, S Moore, C Noussair, GS Berns (2008)
Neurobiological regret and rejoice functions for aversive outcomesNeuroimage, 39
DE Bell (1982)
Regret in decision making under uncertaintyOper Res, 30
Z Liu, L Li, L Zheng, M Xu, FA Zhou, X Guo (2017)
Attentional deployment impacts neural response to regretSci Rep, 7
C Büchel, S Brassen, J Yacubian, R Kalisch, T Sommer (2011)
Ventral striatal signal changes represent missed opportunities and predict future choiceNeuroimage, 57
TL Boles, DM Messick (1995)
A reverse outcome bias: the influence of multiple reference points on the evaluation of outcomes and decisionsOrgan Behav Hum Decis Process, 61
R Guttentag, J Ferrell (2004)
Reality compared with its alternatives: age differences in judgments of regret and reliefDev Psychol, 40
D Kelsey, A Schepanski (1991)
Regret and disappointment in taxpayer reporting decisions: an experimental studyJ Behav Decis Making, 4
T Connolly, M Zeelenberg (2002)
Regret in decision makingCurr Dir Psychol Sci, 11
G Coricelli, Aldo Rustichini (2010)
Counterfactual thinking and emotions: regret and envy learningPhilos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 365
Responsibility is a necessary prerequisite in the experience of regret. The present fMRI study investigated the modulation of responsibility on the neural correlates of regret during a sequential risk-taking task. Participants were asked to open a series of boxes consecutively and decided when to stop. Each box contained a reward, except for one containing a devil to zero participant’s gain in the trial. Once participants stopped, both collected gains and missed chances were revealed. We manipulated responsibility by setting two different contexts. In the Self (high responsibility) context, participants opened boxes and decided when to stop by themselves. In the Computer (low responsibility) context, a computer program opened boxes and decided when to stop for participants. Before each trial, participants were required to decide whether it would be a Self or a Computer context. Behaviorally, participants felt less regret (more relief) for gain outcome and more regret for the loss outcome in the high-responsibility context than low responsibility context. At the neural level, when experiencing a gain, high-responsibility trials were characterized by stronger activation in mPFC, pgACC, mOFC, and striatum with decreasing number of missed chances relative to low responsibility trials. When experiencing a loss, low responsibility trials were associated with stronger activation in dACC and bilateral insula than high-responsibility trials. Conversely, during a loss, high-responsibility trials showed more striatum activity than low responsibility trials. These results highlighted the sensitivity of the frontal region, striatum, and insula to changes in level of responsibility.
Experimental Brain Research – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 3, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.