Response to the reply by C. J. Portier and P. Clausing, concerning our review “Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC”

Response to the reply by C. J. Portier and P. Clausing, concerning our review “Glyphosate... Arch Toxicol (2017) 91:3199–3203 DOI 10.1007/s00204-017-2032-8 REPLY Response to the reply by C. J. Portier and P. Clausing, concerning our review “Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC” 1 1 1 1 Jose V. Tarazona  · Daniele Court‑Marques  · Manuela Tiramani  · Hermine Reich  · 2 1 1 Rudolf Pfeil  · Frederique Istace  · Federica Crivellente   Received: 7 July 2017 / Accepted: 12 July 2017 / Published online: 25 July 2017 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 We welcome the opportunity for having an evidence-based commenting rounds and the public consultation (EFSA scientific discussion on glyphosate’s carcinogenicity. We 2015b). Although our response will be restricted to the note that all of the findings in Table 1 of the Reply by Port - EFSA assessment presented in Tarazona et  al. (2017), it is ier and Clausing (2017) have been available in the public worth noting the similarities in term of complementarity and domain in the supplemental data tables published by Greim transparency between the EFSA process under the pesticides et al. (2015; available online since February 2015). In addi- regulation and the ECHA process under Regulation (EC) No tion, some of these findings were also raised in the report 1272/2008. Germany as RMS under the Regulation (EC) No by IARC, http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Archives of Toxicology Springer Journals

Response to the reply by C. J. Portier and P. Clausing, concerning our review “Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC”

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/response-to-the-reply-by-c-j-portier-and-p-clausing-concerning-our-NDnYVLcIze
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
Subject
Biomedicine; Pharmacology/Toxicology; Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine; Environmental Health; Biomedicine, general
ISSN
0340-5761
eISSN
1432-0738
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00204-017-2032-8
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Arch Toxicol (2017) 91:3199–3203 DOI 10.1007/s00204-017-2032-8 REPLY Response to the reply by C. J. Portier and P. Clausing, concerning our review “Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC” 1 1 1 1 Jose V. Tarazona  · Daniele Court‑Marques  · Manuela Tiramani  · Hermine Reich  · 2 1 1 Rudolf Pfeil  · Frederique Istace  · Federica Crivellente   Received: 7 July 2017 / Accepted: 12 July 2017 / Published online: 25 July 2017 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 We welcome the opportunity for having an evidence-based commenting rounds and the public consultation (EFSA scientific discussion on glyphosate’s carcinogenicity. We 2015b). Although our response will be restricted to the note that all of the findings in Table 1 of the Reply by Port - EFSA assessment presented in Tarazona et  al. (2017), it is ier and Clausing (2017) have been available in the public worth noting the similarities in term of complementarity and domain in the supplemental data tables published by Greim transparency between the EFSA process under the pesticides et al. (2015; available online since February 2015). In addi- regulation and the ECHA process under Regulation (EC) No tion, some of these findings were also raised in the report 1272/2008. Germany as RMS under the Regulation (EC) No by IARC,

Journal

Archives of ToxicologySpringer Journals

Published: Jul 25, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off