Response to “The physics of ghost imaging—nonlocal interference or local intensity fluctuation correlation?”

Response to “The physics of ghost imaging—nonlocal interference or local intensity... Quantum Inf Process (2012) 11:1003–1011 DOI 10.1007/s11128-012-0399-2 Response to “The physics of ghost imaging—nonlocal interference or local intensity fluctuation correlation?” Jeffrey H. Shapiro · Robert W. Boyd Received: 9 March 2012 / Accepted: 15 March 2012 / Published online: 25 March 2012 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012 Shih has objected to the semiclassical explanation for lensless pseudothermal ghost imaging—whose measurement configuration is shown schematically in Fig. 8 of [1]—that is reviewed by Shapiro and Boyd. In Shih’s view, the only valid expla- nation for lensless pseudothermal ghost imaging is nonlocal two-photon interference, i.e., a purely quantum phenomenon. Shapiro and Boyd also develop that explana- tion for the lensless pseudothermal ghost image, where they show it to be equivalent, in its quantitative predictions, to the speckle-correlation interpretation arising from semiclassical photodetection theory. Thus, Sect. 1 of [1] concludes: “That the semi- classical and quantum theories yield identical measurements statistics in this case means that pseudothermal ghost-imaging experiments cannot distinguish between these two interpretations, even though we know that light is intrinsically quantum mechanical.” Shih begins by observing that Shapiro and Boyd fail to compare lensless pseudo- thermal ghost imaging of Scarcelli et al. [2], with the lens-based pseudothermal ghost http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Quantum Information Processing Springer Journals

Response to “The physics of ghost imaging—nonlocal interference or local intensity fluctuation correlation?”

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/response-to-the-physics-of-ghost-imaging-nonlocal-interference-or-0wwr5h4rxS
Publisher
Springer US
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
Subject
Physics; Mathematical Physics; Quantum Computing; Quantum Information Technology, Spintronics; Data Structures, Cryptology and Information Theory; Quantum Physics
ISSN
1570-0755
eISSN
1573-1332
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11128-012-0399-2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Quantum Inf Process (2012) 11:1003–1011 DOI 10.1007/s11128-012-0399-2 Response to “The physics of ghost imaging—nonlocal interference or local intensity fluctuation correlation?” Jeffrey H. Shapiro · Robert W. Boyd Received: 9 March 2012 / Accepted: 15 March 2012 / Published online: 25 March 2012 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012 Shih has objected to the semiclassical explanation for lensless pseudothermal ghost imaging—whose measurement configuration is shown schematically in Fig. 8 of [1]—that is reviewed by Shapiro and Boyd. In Shih’s view, the only valid expla- nation for lensless pseudothermal ghost imaging is nonlocal two-photon interference, i.e., a purely quantum phenomenon. Shapiro and Boyd also develop that explana- tion for the lensless pseudothermal ghost image, where they show it to be equivalent, in its quantitative predictions, to the speckle-correlation interpretation arising from semiclassical photodetection theory. Thus, Sect. 1 of [1] concludes: “That the semi- classical and quantum theories yield identical measurements statistics in this case means that pseudothermal ghost-imaging experiments cannot distinguish between these two interpretations, even though we know that light is intrinsically quantum mechanical.” Shih begins by observing that Shapiro and Boyd fail to compare lensless pseudo- thermal ghost imaging of Scarcelli et al. [2], with the lens-based pseudothermal ghost

Journal

Quantum Information ProcessingSpringer Journals

Published: Mar 25, 2012

References

  • Correlated imaging, quantum and classical
    Gatti, A.; Brambilla, E.; Bache, M.; Lugiato, L.A.
  • Ghost imaging through turbulent atmosphere
    Cheng, J.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off