Response to letter to the editor: “is drug induced sedation endoscopy surgical decision making process objective and systematic?”

Response to letter to the editor: “is drug induced sedation endoscopy surgical decision making... Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (2017) 274:3547 DOI 10.1007/s00405-017-4564-1 LETTE R T O T HE EDI T OR Response to letter to the editor: ‘‘is drug induced sedation endoscopy surgical decision making process objective and systematic?’’ 1,2 Andrea De Vito Received: 29 March 2017 / Accepted: 4 April 2017 / Published online: 20 April 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017 Dear Editor, the better postoperative AHI outcome is, as a consequence. (3) The candidate’s surgical selection begins before DISE per- The authors thank for the overall positive opinion expressed formance. We should select OSA patients, in whom anatom- about our paper ‘‘The importance of drug-sedation endoscopy ical factors represent the main pathophysiological reason of (DISE) techniques in surgical decision making: conventional obstructive events, by means of the PSG/PM analysis. After versus target controlled infusion techniques—a prospective that, during DISE, we decide the single or combined surgical randomized controlled study and a retrospective surgical techniques to perform, observing the level, grade, and pattern outcomes’’ in the letter to the editor entitled ‘‘Is Drug Induced of upper airways obstruction, taking into account the surgical Sedation Endoscopy surgical decision-making process technology available in our institution (conventional surgical objective and systematic?’’ and we wish briefly reply to the procedures vs radiofrequency vs robotic surgery). (4) We questions raised by the reader. (1) To the best of our knowl- concur with you about the need of make database of sleep edge, at least 16 DISE classification’s systems are reported up centers available, including DISE videos. (5) We strongly to now in the literature and each classification has positive suggest that the patient referral process for surgical treatment aspects, but also limitation. Currently, there is not a DISE could be systematic and objective across the world if any sleep classification system universally accepted. Our NOHL clas- center and/or otorhinolaryngologist approaching a SBD sification system provides a scoring index for upper airways in patient in daily practice will perform or analyze a correct awake and sleep stage setting, which can support the decision- polysomnography/portable monitoring trace in which will be making process for surgical treatment, as reported in our possible to distinguish OSA patient with anatomical reason of experience. We have introduced the NOHL classification obstructive event (phasic desaturation pattern) from SBD system since 1996 in our clinical routine and we believe that patient no-OSA (prolonged desaturation pattern or overlap the experience built in about 20 years represents the main patterns). Moreover, a team of experienced otorhinolaryn- reason for the postoperative AHI outcome obtained (TCI- gologist and anesthesiologist should perform DISE, by means DISE: from 27.5 ± 3.4 to 8.1 ± 4.2; C-DISE: from of the support of the best technology available (at least target 27.1 ± 4.6 to 11.5 ± 4.2). (2) We strongly believe that the controlled infusion pump). We also suggest organizing groups more otorhinolaryngologist and anesthesiologist deeply DISE of study across the world, who could realize DISE analysis and experience is, the better candidate’s surgical selection is, and standardization, providing results consistently comparable. This reply refers to the comment available at Compliance with ethical standards doi:10.1007/s00405-017-4544-5. Conflict of interest Author Andrea De Vito declares that he has no & Andrea De Vito conflict of interest. dr.andrea.devito@gmail.com Ethical approval This article does not contain any studies with Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Otorhinolaryngology human participants or animals performed by any of the author. and Oral Surgery Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Via Forlanini, 34, 47121 Forlı `, Italy Financial disclosure No financial disclosures. Via Dei Gerolimini 12, 47121 Forlı, Italy http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Springer Journals

Response to letter to the editor: “is drug induced sedation endoscopy surgical decision making process objective and systematic?”

Free
1 page

Loading next page...
1 Page
 
/lp/springer_journal/response-to-letter-to-the-editor-is-drug-induced-sedation-endoscopy-rOoRvHJkRR
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Otorhinolaryngology; Neurosurgery; Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN
0937-4477
eISSN
1434-4726
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00405-017-4564-1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial