Response to Lalumière and Rice: Further Comments on Looman & Marshall (2005)

Response to Lalumière and Rice: Further Comments on Looman & Marshall (2005) Sex Abuse (2007) 19:69–72 DOI 10.1007/s11194-007-9036-5 BRIEF REPORT Response to Lalumier ` e and Rice: Further Comments on Looman & Marshall (2005) Jan Looman Published online: 3 March 2007 C Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007 Looman & Marshall (2005) reported on a comparison of sexual offenders’ responses to two widely used audiotaped-stimulus assessments of sexual arousal to rape and consenting sex depictions. They concluded that there was little agreement between the two stimulus sets in terms of which offenders were identified as sexually deviant, and they expressed concern about the validity of conclusions drawn from such assessments. Lalumiere ` & Rice (this issue) provide a critical commentary of Looman & Marshall (2005), “point[ing] out errors, omissions, methodological concerns and other problems ... that greatly affect the conclusions that should be drawn,” based, in large part, on assumptions they are making concerning the methodology used in the latter paper. This response will address these concerns and clarify some of the issues raised by Lalumiere ` & Rice. The first concern raised by Lalumiere ` & Rice is that it is “unclear whether any of the rapists had also had child victims or if any of the child molesters had also http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment Springer Journals

Response to Lalumière and Rice: Further Comments on Looman & Marshall (2005)

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/response-to-lalumi-re-and-rice-further-comments-on-looman-marshall-piXLDN1AjI
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
Subject
Psychology; Criminology & Criminal Justice; Clinical Psychology; Psychiatry ; Sexual Behavior
ISSN
1079-0632
eISSN
1573-286X
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11194-007-9036-5
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Sex Abuse (2007) 19:69–72 DOI 10.1007/s11194-007-9036-5 BRIEF REPORT Response to Lalumier ` e and Rice: Further Comments on Looman & Marshall (2005) Jan Looman Published online: 3 March 2007 C Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007 Looman & Marshall (2005) reported on a comparison of sexual offenders’ responses to two widely used audiotaped-stimulus assessments of sexual arousal to rape and consenting sex depictions. They concluded that there was little agreement between the two stimulus sets in terms of which offenders were identified as sexually deviant, and they expressed concern about the validity of conclusions drawn from such assessments. Lalumiere ` & Rice (this issue) provide a critical commentary of Looman & Marshall (2005), “point[ing] out errors, omissions, methodological concerns and other problems ... that greatly affect the conclusions that should be drawn,” based, in large part, on assumptions they are making concerning the methodology used in the latter paper. This response will address these concerns and clarify some of the issues raised by Lalumiere ` & Rice. The first concern raised by Lalumiere ` & Rice is that it is “unclear whether any of the rapists had also had child victims or if any of the child molesters had also

Journal

Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and TreatmentSpringer Journals

Published: Mar 3, 2007

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off