Arch Sex Behav (2017) 46:2207–2208 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1047-9 LETTE R T O T HE EDITOR Response to Greaves et al.’s (2017)‘‘The Diversity and Prevalence of Sexual Orientation Self-Labels in a New Zealand National Sample’’ 1 1 2 • • J. Elisabeth Wells Magnus A. McGee Annette L. Beautrais Received: 8 July 2017 / Accepted: 19 July 2017 / Published online: 2 August 2017 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017 Greaves et al. (2017) reported on open-ended self-labels for sexual for this question was less than 0.5%, even if‘‘Something else’’is orientation generated by participants in a large New Zealand sur- counted as missing which seems unfair to those who responded vey. They provided considerable detail around the labels pro- in this way. The second question asked,‘‘Have you ever had any duced in written or online responses. They also commented on kind of sexual experience with a partner of the same sex?’’and results from an earlier New Zealand survey by Wells, McGee, the third asked,‘‘Have you ever had a sexual relationship with and Beautrais (2011) which used prescribed labels. We are puz- a partner of the same sex?’’Again, there were very little missing zled by their report of the extent of missing data in
Archives of Sexual Behavior – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 2, 2017
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud