Response to Congleton and Wagner’s reviews of “Is the Welfare State Justified?”

Response to Congleton and Wagner’s reviews of “Is the Welfare State Justified?” Rev Austrian Econ (2010) 23:107–110 DOI 10.1007/s11138-009-0100-x Response to Congleton and Wagner’s reviews of “Is the Welfare State Justified?” Daniel Shapiro Published online: 5 November 2009 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009 I am grateful to the editors of the Review of Austrian Economics to have the opportunity to respond to Roger Congleton and Richard Wagner’s reviews of Is the Welfare State Justified? (Shapiro 2007, henceforth IWSJ). The book’s arguments were addressed to people in a variety of disciplines, in particular, philosophers and economists, and the reviews by these thoughtful economists provide me with an opportunity to clarify some matters that were perhaps not sufficiently emphasized in IWSJ as well as to respond to some important criticisms. In particular, I will focus on the aims or methodology of IWSJ and whether the alternatives I argue are superior to the social insurance and government welfare—which I describe as “market-based alternatives” to the welfare state—should instead be considered as modifications of the welfare state. The aim of IWSJ is to show that philosophers who support central welfare state institutions such as Social Security, National Health Insurance, and government welfare, should, given their own principles or values, support more market-based alternatives http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Review of Austrian Economics Springer Journals

Response to Congleton and Wagner’s reviews of “Is the Welfare State Justified?”

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/response-to-congleton-and-wagner-s-reviews-of-is-the-welfare-state-00xDVWNURz
Publisher
Springer US
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
Subject
Economics; Public Finance; Political Science; History of Economic Thought/Methodology
ISSN
0889-3047
eISSN
1573-7128
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11138-009-0100-x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Rev Austrian Econ (2010) 23:107–110 DOI 10.1007/s11138-009-0100-x Response to Congleton and Wagner’s reviews of “Is the Welfare State Justified?” Daniel Shapiro Published online: 5 November 2009 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009 I am grateful to the editors of the Review of Austrian Economics to have the opportunity to respond to Roger Congleton and Richard Wagner’s reviews of Is the Welfare State Justified? (Shapiro 2007, henceforth IWSJ). The book’s arguments were addressed to people in a variety of disciplines, in particular, philosophers and economists, and the reviews by these thoughtful economists provide me with an opportunity to clarify some matters that were perhaps not sufficiently emphasized in IWSJ as well as to respond to some important criticisms. In particular, I will focus on the aims or methodology of IWSJ and whether the alternatives I argue are superior to the social insurance and government welfare—which I describe as “market-based alternatives” to the welfare state—should instead be considered as modifications of the welfare state. The aim of IWSJ is to show that philosophers who support central welfare state institutions such as Social Security, National Health Insurance, and government welfare, should, given their own principles or values, support more market-based alternatives

Journal

The Review of Austrian EconomicsSpringer Journals

Published: Nov 5, 2009

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off