Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Ihlanfeldt (1997)
Information on the Spatial Distribution of Job Opportunities within Metropolitan AreasJournal of Urban Economics, 41
J. Clapp (1993)
Dynamics of Office Markets: Empirical Findings and Research Issues
W. H. Green (1993)
Econometric Analysis
D. McMillen, J. Mcdonald (1998)
Suburban Subcenters and Employment Density in Metropolitan ChicagoJournal of Urban Economics, 43
Michael Potepan (1996)
Explaining Intermetropolitan Variation in Housing Prices, Rents and Land PricesReal Estate Economics, 24
K. E. Case, C. J. Mayer (1996)
Housing Price Dynamics Within a Metropolitan AreaRegional Science and Urban Economics, 26
C. Bollinger, K. Ihlanfeldt, David Bowes (1998)
Spatial Variation in Office Rents within the Atlanta RegionUrban Studies, 35
Masahisa Fujita (1989)
Urban Economic Theory: Land Use and City SizeThe Economic Journal, 100
R. Sivitanidou (1997)
Are Center Access Advantages Weakening? The Case of Office-Commercial MarketsJournal of Urban Economics, 42
A. Downs (1994)
New Visions For Metropolitan America
J. Garreau (1991)
Edge City
K. Case, C. Mayer (1995)
Housing Price Dynamics within a Metropolitan AreaNBER Working Paper Series
J. Jackson (1979)
Intraurban variation in the price of housingJournal of Urban Economics, 6
R. Shiller (1995)
Macro Markets: Creating Institutions for Managing Society's Largest Economic Risks
A. M. Hamer (1974)
Metropolitan Planning and the Location Behavior of Basic Office Firms: A Case StudyReview of Regional Studies, 4
Alex Anas, R. Arnott, K. Small (1997)
URBAN SPATIAL STRUCTURE.Journal of Economic Literature, 36
The land-value surface in suburban Washington, D.C., changed dramatically over the decade of the 1980s. This article explains these changes in terms of the decentralization of jobs versus socioeconomic trends. Contemporaneous correlation among selected variables needs to be controlled with reduced forms and SES techniques. But all explanatory variables except distance from some unchanged point are determined simultaneously. Predetermined variables control for this double-endogeneity issue.Land values in 1990 have a U-shape with respect to distance from the U.S. Capitol Building after controlling for other variables. The data indicate that this is the result of demographic changes rather than the development of suburban employment nodes: polycentric SUE theory is rejected. Land values are an increasing function of lagged land values, a decreasing function of work at home. Moreover, work at home is attracted by low structural density and high socioeconomic status as well as low land values. This supports the argument that demographics and technological innovations have shaped the land-value surface; baby boomers are seeking low-density housing for work and family life.
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 3, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.