Reporting missing data: a study of selected articles published from 2003–2007

Reporting missing data: a study of selected articles published from 2003–2007 Missing data (MD) is prevalent in empirical social science research (Allison, http://books.google.ca/books?id=ZtYArHXjpB8Canddq=missing+dataandprintsec=frontcoverandsource=blandots=ziTBvDHxWbandsig=Uiy83xDbWSO4HeBSth0Q_oZIrQandhl=enandei=q6A7Su25ApnIM-eYlccOandsa=Xandoi=book_resultandct=resultandresnum , 2001; Rubin in J Am Stat Assoc 91:473–489, 1996). Furthermore, inconsistencies in the reporting and treatment of MD have been documented (Peugh and Enders in Rev Educ Res 74:525–556, 2004). The goal of the current project was to examine how MD was reported and treated in 68 studies issued from a refereed educational journal. It was observed that a fifth of the quantitative articles reviewed actually treated MD, using mainly deletion methods and only 10% of the explicit articles explained MD. Overall, MD reported or inferred averaged about 33% of cases and was commonly associated with missing subjects. Only three articles provided the actual percentages of MD. The results suggest that there may be a lack of consistency in how MD is reported and treated and that studies may remain deficient in how MD is addressed. The importance of the study was to signal tendencies in reporting and treating MD, to provide tentative explanations for such trends, to propose hypotheses for future empirical studies in the field, and to offer an initial set of practical guidelines for including addressing, explaining, and treating MD in educational research. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Quality & Quantity Springer Journals

Reporting missing data: a study of selected articles published from 2003–2007

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/reporting-missing-data-a-study-of-selected-articles-published-from-mCQJTa1VDM
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 by Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Subject
Social Sciences; Methodology of the Social Sciences; Social Sciences, general
ISSN
0033-5177
eISSN
1573-7845
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11135-011-9452-y
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Missing data (MD) is prevalent in empirical social science research (Allison, http://books.google.ca/books?id=ZtYArHXjpB8Canddq=missing+dataandprintsec=frontcoverandsource=blandots=ziTBvDHxWbandsig=Uiy83xDbWSO4HeBSth0Q_oZIrQandhl=enandei=q6A7Su25ApnIM-eYlccOandsa=Xandoi=book_resultandct=resultandresnum , 2001; Rubin in J Am Stat Assoc 91:473–489, 1996). Furthermore, inconsistencies in the reporting and treatment of MD have been documented (Peugh and Enders in Rev Educ Res 74:525–556, 2004). The goal of the current project was to examine how MD was reported and treated in 68 studies issued from a refereed educational journal. It was observed that a fifth of the quantitative articles reviewed actually treated MD, using mainly deletion methods and only 10% of the explicit articles explained MD. Overall, MD reported or inferred averaged about 33% of cases and was commonly associated with missing subjects. Only three articles provided the actual percentages of MD. The results suggest that there may be a lack of consistency in how MD is reported and treated and that studies may remain deficient in how MD is addressed. The importance of the study was to signal tendencies in reporting and treating MD, to provide tentative explanations for such trends, to propose hypotheses for future empirical studies in the field, and to offer an initial set of practical guidelines for including addressing, explaining, and treating MD in educational research.

Journal

Quality & QuantitySpringer Journals

Published: Mar 4, 2011

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off