Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine (2018) 41:11–12 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-018-0626-y LE T TER TO THE EDITOR Reply to Letter to the Editor: Giovanni Bibbo, Standardisation of shielding of medical X-ray installations Luke Wilkinson Published online: 19 February 2018 © Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine 2018 The letter from Giovanni Bibbo raises some interest- is very much bound by the assumptions applied in defining ing points with respect to standardisation of shielding the source terms, occupancy levels in surrounding areas and design within Australia. In his letter Giovanni suggests the attenuation provided by pre-existing structures while use that ARPANSA take leadership in developing appropriate of a model based on maximum instantaneous dose-rate does standards, that the ACPSEM develop appropriate shielding not represent the true operating conditions and radiation training courses and that a standardised methodology be environment of the facility and can lead to over-shielding promoted. On face value these are all very sensible things [5, 6]. Additionally none of these models are really flexible to propose however it is considered that several additional enough to be applied to evolving technologies such as hybrid comments need to be made in this area. These relate to the CT/molecular imaging systems or mobile
Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine – Springer Journals
Published: Feb 19, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud