Repeatability of a terminal restriction fragment telomere length assay on red drum fin tissue

Repeatability of a terminal restriction fragment telomere length assay on red drum fin tissue Telomere length measurements are becoming increasingly popular in biology as a non-lethal tool for estimating organisms’ biological conditions. One particularly appealing application of telomere length measurements for conservation biologists is genetic age estimation. Most age estimation methods require animals to be sacrificed followed by the dissection and sectioning of calcified structures. Because telomeres degrade over time, telomere lengths may provide non-lethal and minimally invasive tool for estimating age. Furthermore, telomere length may also be useful for predicting longevity and fitness. Traditionally, telomere lengths have been measured using terminal restriction fragment (TRF) methodology; however, there is no one standard laboratory procedure to estimate the size of these fragments, and few studies supply repeatability data for the respective methods. While TRF telomere length assays are applicable to all organisms with known telomere repeat motif sequences, inconsistencies in TRF methodology include template DNA treatment, restriction enzymes used, gel electrophoresis methods, and probe/detection methods. Here we present a study documenting repeatability data for a specific laboratory procedure for estimating telomere length using two common restriction enzymes, denaturing pulsed field gel electrophoresis, and a chemiluminescent detection system for three replicates of 16 individual red drum collected in South Carolina. The data were analyzed following traditional methods using an average across the entire TRF distribution, which represents all TRF lengths found in the sample; and following non-traditional methods, where only a subsample of the TRF distributions are analyzed. Our results demonstrate a strong correlation among average TRF lengths between replicates while analyzing the entire TRF distribution; however, our results show a decreasing trend of consistency between replicates as smaller portions of the TRF distribution were analyzed. These results suggest our method provides a repeatable estimate of average TRF length in a sample, and we urge that caution should be exercised when subsampling TRF distributions for telomere length analysis. Repeatability data not only validate the assay producing the data, but also may allow researchers to develop standard optimal criteria to balance cost and extent of their study design. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Conservation Genetics Resources Springer Journals

Repeatability of a terminal restriction fragment telomere length assay on red drum fin tissue

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/repeatability-of-a-terminal-restriction-fragment-telomere-length-assay-ibqN5W0XPa
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
Subject
Life Sciences; Conservation Biology/Ecology; Ecology; Biodiversity; Evolutionary Biology; Plant Genetics and Genomics; Animal Genetics and Genomics
eISSN
1877-7260
D.O.I.
10.1007/s12686-017-0698-0
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Telomere length measurements are becoming increasingly popular in biology as a non-lethal tool for estimating organisms’ biological conditions. One particularly appealing application of telomere length measurements for conservation biologists is genetic age estimation. Most age estimation methods require animals to be sacrificed followed by the dissection and sectioning of calcified structures. Because telomeres degrade over time, telomere lengths may provide non-lethal and minimally invasive tool for estimating age. Furthermore, telomere length may also be useful for predicting longevity and fitness. Traditionally, telomere lengths have been measured using terminal restriction fragment (TRF) methodology; however, there is no one standard laboratory procedure to estimate the size of these fragments, and few studies supply repeatability data for the respective methods. While TRF telomere length assays are applicable to all organisms with known telomere repeat motif sequences, inconsistencies in TRF methodology include template DNA treatment, restriction enzymes used, gel electrophoresis methods, and probe/detection methods. Here we present a study documenting repeatability data for a specific laboratory procedure for estimating telomere length using two common restriction enzymes, denaturing pulsed field gel electrophoresis, and a chemiluminescent detection system for three replicates of 16 individual red drum collected in South Carolina. The data were analyzed following traditional methods using an average across the entire TRF distribution, which represents all TRF lengths found in the sample; and following non-traditional methods, where only a subsample of the TRF distributions are analyzed. Our results demonstrate a strong correlation among average TRF lengths between replicates while analyzing the entire TRF distribution; however, our results show a decreasing trend of consistency between replicates as smaller portions of the TRF distribution were analyzed. These results suggest our method provides a repeatable estimate of average TRF length in a sample, and we urge that caution should be exercised when subsampling TRF distributions for telomere length analysis. Repeatability data not only validate the assay producing the data, but also may allow researchers to develop standard optimal criteria to balance cost and extent of their study design.

Journal

Conservation Genetics ResourcesSpringer Journals

Published: Feb 15, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off