Reinforced staplers for distal pancreatectomy

Reinforced staplers for distal pancreatectomy Purpose The safety and efficacy of reinforced staplers during 16 of the patients were excluded based on discontinuation of distal pancreatectomy (DP) remain controversial because of protocol treatment criteria. Clinically relevant pancreatic fis- the small sample size. This multicenter single-arm prospective tula occurred in 13 (12.4%) of 105 patients. The overall mor- study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of reinforced bidity rate was 29.5% (31 of 105 patients) and severe compli- staplers with bioabsorbable material during DP. cation (Clavien classification IIIa or more) was 10.5% (11/ Methods Between October 2014 and August 2015, 121 pa- 105). Mortality rate was 0%, although reoperations were per- tients scheduled for DP were enrolled in this study at 11 insti- formed on two patients (1.9%). Multivariate logistic regres- tutions in Japan. The primary endpoint was the incidence of sion analysis of independent risk factors for clinically relevant clinically relevant pancreatic fistula. Protocol treatment was pancreatic fistula after DP using reinforced stapler closure was defined as Bdistal pancreatectomy using reinforced staplers.^ operative time more than 240 min (P= 0.047, odds ratio 5.79), registration numbers less than 10 (P= 0.046, odds ratio 13.01), and staple line hemorrhage (P= 0.003, odds ratio * Hiroki http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Springer Journals
Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/reinforced-staplers-for-distal-pancreatectomy-C727ECSkqy
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; General Surgery; Abdominal Surgery; Cardiac Surgery; Thoracic Surgery; Traumatic Surgery; Vascular Surgery
ISSN
1435-2443
eISSN
1435-2451
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00423-017-1634-1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose The safety and efficacy of reinforced staplers during 16 of the patients were excluded based on discontinuation of distal pancreatectomy (DP) remain controversial because of protocol treatment criteria. Clinically relevant pancreatic fis- the small sample size. This multicenter single-arm prospective tula occurred in 13 (12.4%) of 105 patients. The overall mor- study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of reinforced bidity rate was 29.5% (31 of 105 patients) and severe compli- staplers with bioabsorbable material during DP. cation (Clavien classification IIIa or more) was 10.5% (11/ Methods Between October 2014 and August 2015, 121 pa- 105). Mortality rate was 0%, although reoperations were per- tients scheduled for DP were enrolled in this study at 11 insti- formed on two patients (1.9%). Multivariate logistic regres- tutions in Japan. The primary endpoint was the incidence of sion analysis of independent risk factors for clinically relevant clinically relevant pancreatic fistula. Protocol treatment was pancreatic fistula after DP using reinforced stapler closure was defined as Bdistal pancreatectomy using reinforced staplers.^ operative time more than 240 min (P= 0.047, odds ratio 5.79), registration numbers less than 10 (P= 0.046, odds ratio 13.01), and staple line hemorrhage (P= 0.003, odds ratio * Hiroki

Journal

Langenbeck's Archives of SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Nov 4, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off