Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Rambau, Terence Robinson (2004)
Chromosome painting in the African four-striped mouse Rhabdomys pumilio: Detection of possible murid specific contiguous segment combinationsChromosome Research, 11
M. Ferguson-Smith (1997)
Genetic Analysis by Chromosome Sorting and Painting: Phylogenetic and Diagnostic ApplicationsEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 5
R. Pavia, L. Smith, D. Goldenberg (1977)
An analysis of the g‐banded chromosomes of the golden hamsterInternational Journal of Cancer, 20
K. Matsubara, C. Nishida-Umehara, A. Kuroiwa, K. Tsuchiya, Y. Matsuda (2004)
Identification of chromosome rearrangements between the laboratory mouse (Mus musculus) and the Indian spiny mouse (Mus platythrix) by comparative FISH analysisChromosome Research, 11
Shaoying Li, S. Pathak, T. Hsu (1982)
High resolution G-banding patterns of Syrian hamster chromosomes.Cytogenetics and cell genetics, 33 4
Vladimir Trifonov, P. Perelman, S. Kawada, Masahiro Iwasa, Sen-ichi Oda, A. Graphodatsky (2004)
Complex structure of B-chromosomes in two mammalian species: Apodemus peninsulae (Rodentia) and Nyctereutes procyonoides (Carnivora)Chromosome Research, 10
SI Radjabli, OV Sablina, AS Graphodatsky (2006)
ATLAS of Mammalian Karyotypes
H. Telenius, B. Ponder, A. Tunnacliffe, A. Pelmear, N. Carter, M. Ferguson-Smith, A. Behmel, M. Nordenskjöld, R. Pfragner (1992)
Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using dop‐pcr amplified flow‐sorted chromosomesGenes, 4
W. Murphy, R. Stanyon, S. O’Brien (2001)
Evolution of mammalian genome organization inferred from comparative gene mappingGenome Biology, 2
(2001)
Phylogenetic implications of the 38 putative ancestral chromosome segments for four canid species.
M. Guilly, P. Fouchet, P. Chamisso, A. Schmitz, B. Dutrillaux (2004)
Comparative Karyotype of Rat and Mouse Using Bidirectional Chromosome PaintingChromosome Research, 7
VA Trifonov, PL Perelman, SI Kawada, MA Iwasa, SI Oda (2002)
Complex structure of B-chromosomes in two mammalian species: Apodemus peninsulae (Rodentia) and Nyctereutes procyonoides (Carnivora) revealed by microdissectionChromosome Res, 10
A. Graphodatsky, O. Sablina, M. Meyer, V. Malikov, E. Isakova, V. Trifonov, A. Polyakov, T. Lushnikova, N. Vorobieva, N. Serdyukova, P. Perelman, P. Borodin, P. Benda, D. Frynta, L. Leikepová, P. Munclinger, J. Pialek, J. Sádlová, J. Zima (2000)
Comparative cytogenetics of hamsters of the genus CalomyscusCytogenetic and Genome Research, 88
N. Popescu, J. DiPaolo (1972)
Identification of Syrian hamster chromosomes by acetic-saline-Giemsa (ASG) and trypsin techniques.Cytogenetics, 11 6
W. Murphy, D. Larkin, Annelie Wind, G. Bourque, G. Tesler, L. Auvil, J. Beever, B. Chowdhary, F. Galibert, Lisa Gatzke, C. Hitte, Stacey Meyers, D. Milan, E. Ostrander, Greg Pape, H. Parker, T. Raudsepp, M. Rogatcheva, L. Schook, L. Skow, M. Welge, J. Womack, S. O’Brien, P. Pevzner, H. Lewin (2005)
Dynamics of Mammalian Chromosome Evolution Inferred from Multispecies Comparative MapsScience, 309
P. Cavagna, G. Stone, R. Stanyon (2002)
Black rat (Rattus rattus) genomic variability characterized by chromosome paintingMammalian Genome, 13
Fengtang Yang, Nigel Carter, L. Shi, M. Ferguson-Smith (1995)
A comparative study of karyotypes of muntjacs by chromosome paintingChromosoma, 103
R. Stanyon, Fengtang Yang, A. Morescalchi, L. Galleni (2004)
Chromosome painting in the long-tailed field mouse provides insights into the ancestral murid karyotypeCytogenetic and Genome Research, 105
W. Dawson, S. Young, Zongren Wang, Linda Liu, I. Greenbaum, L. Davis, B. Hall (1999)
Mus and Peromyscus chromosome homology established by FISH with three mouse paint probesMammalian Genome, 10
Fengtang Yang, P. O’Brien, M. Ferguson-Smith (2004)
Comparative Chromosome Map of the Laboratory Mouse and Chinese Hamster Defined by Reciprocal Chromosome PaintingChromosome Research, 8
C. Halnan (1989)
Cytogenetics of animals
R Stanyon, F Yang, P Cavagna, PC O’Brien, M Bagga (1999)
Reciprocal chromosome painting shows that genomic rearrangement between rat and mouse proceeds ten times faster than between humans and catsCytogenet Cell Genet, 84
R. Gamperl, G. Vistorin, W. Rosenkranz (1978)
Comparison of Chromosome Banding Patterns in Five Members of Cricetinae with Comments on Possible RelationshipsCaryologia, 31
R. Waterston, K. Lindblad-Toh, E. Birney, J. Rogers, J. Abril, P. Agarwal, R. Agarwala, R. Ainscough, M. Alexandersson, Peter An, S. Antonarakis, J. Attwood, R. Baertsch, J. Bailey, K. Barlow, S. Beck, E. Berry, B. Birren, Toby Bloom, P. Bork, M. Botcherby, Nicolas Bray, M. Brent, Daniel Brown, Stephen Brown, C. Bult, J. Burton, Jonathan Butler, R. Campbell, Piero Carninci, S. Cawley, F. Chiaromonte, A. Chinwalla, D. Church, M. Clamp, C. Clee, F. Collins, L. Cook, R. Copley, A. Coulson, O. Couronne, James Cuff, V. Curwen, T. Cutts, M. Daly, R. David, J. Davies, K. Delehaunty, J. Deri, E. Dermitzakis, Colin Dewey, N. Dickens, M. Diekhans, S. Dodge, I. Dubchak, D. Dunn, S. Eddy, L. Elnitski, Richard Emes, P. Eswara, E. Eyras, A. Felsenfeld, G. Fewell, P. Flicek, Karen Foley, W. Frankel, L. Fulton, R. Fulton, T. Furey, D. Gage, R. Gibbs, Gwênlyn Glusman, S. Gnerre, N. Goldman, L. Goodstadt, D. Grafham, T. Graves, E. Green, S. Gregory, R. Guigó, M. Guyer, R. Hardison, D. Haussler, Y. Hayashizaki, Deana LaHillier, A. Hinrichs, W. Hlavina, T. Holzer, F. Hsu, A. Hua, T. Hubbard, A. Hunt, I. Jackson, D. Jaffe, L. Johnson, Matthew Jones, T. Jones, A. Joy, Michael Kamal, E. Karlsson, D. Karolchik, A. Kasprzyk, J. Kawai, Evan Keibler, C. Kells, W. Kent, Andrew Kirby, D. Kolbe, I. Korf, R. Kucherlapati, E. Kulbokas, D. Kulp, Tom Landers, J. Leger, Steven Leonard, Ivica Letunic, R. Levine, Jia Li, Ming Li, C. Lloyd, S. Lucas, Bin Ma, D. Maglott, E. Mardis, L. Matthews, E. Mauceli, John Mayer, M. McCarthy, W. McCombie, Stuart Mclaren, K. McLay, J. McPherson, J. Meldrim, B. Meredith, J. Mesirov, W. Miller, T. Miner, Emmanuel Mongin, K. Montgomery, M. Morgan, R. Mott, J. Mullikin, D. Muzny, W. Nash, J. Nelson, M. Nhan, R. Nicol, Z. Ning, C. Nusbaum, M. O’Connor, Y. Okazaki, K. Oliver, E. Overton-Larty, L. Pachter, Genís Parra, K. Pepin, Jane Peterson, P. Pevzner, R. Plumb, C. Pohl, Alexander Poliakov, Tracy Ponce, C. Ponting, Simon Potter, M. Quail, A. Reymond, B. Roe, K. Roskin, E. Rubin, A. Rust, R. Santos, V. Sapojnikov, Brian Schultz, J. Schultz, M. Schwartz, S. Schwartz, C. Scott, S. Seaman, S. Searle, Ted Sharpe, A. Sheridan, R. Shownkeen, S. Sims, J. Singer, G. Slater, A. Smit, Douglas Smith, B. Spencer, Arne Stabenau, N. Stange-thomann, C. Sugnet, M. Suyama, G. Tesler, J. Thompson, D. Torrents, E. Trevaskis, J. Tromp, C. Ucla, A. Ureta-Vidal, J. Vinson, A. Niederhausern, C. Wade, M. Wall, R. Weber, R. Weiss, M. Wendl, A. West, K. Wetterstrand, R. Wheeler, S. Whelan, Jamey Wierzbowski, D. Willey, Sophie Williams, R. Wilson, E. Winter, K. Worley, D. Wyman, Shan Yang, Shiaw-Pyng Yang, E. Zdobnov, M. Zody, E. Lander (2002)
Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome.Nature, 420
Fengtang Yang, P. O’Brien, B. Milne, A. Graphodatsky, N. Solanky, V. Trifonov, W. Rens, D. Sargan, M. Ferguson-Smith (1999)
A complete comparative chromosome map for the dog, red fox, and human and its integration with canine genetic maps.Genomics, 62 2
R. Stanyon, Fengtang Yang, P. Cavagna, P. O’Brien, M. Bagga, M. Ferguson-Smith, Johannes Wienberg (1999)
Reciprocal chromosome painting shows that genomic rearrangement between rat and mouse proceeds ten times faster than between humans and catsCytogenetic and Genome Research, 84
H. Scherthan, T. Cremer, Ú. Árnason, H. Weier, A. Lima-de-faria, L. Frönicke (1994)
Comparative chromosome painting discloses homologous segments in distantly related mammalsNature Genetics, 6
Scott Steppan, R. Adkins, Joel Anderson (2004)
Phylogeny and divergence-date estimates of rapid radiations in muroid rodents based on multiple nuclear genes.Systematic biology, 53 4
M. Guilly, L. Dano, P. Chamisso, P. Fouchet, B. Dutrillaux, S. Chevillard (2001)
Comparative karyotype using bidirectional chromosome painting: how and why?Methods in cell science : an official journal of the Society for In Vitro Biology, 23 1-3
Adriaan Engelbrecht, G. Dobigny, Terence Robinson (2005)
Further insights into the ancestral murine karyotype: the contribution of the Otomys – Mus comparison using chromosome paintingCytogenetic and Genome Research, 112
AS Graphodatsky, OV Sablina, MN Meyer, VG Malikov, EA Isakova (2000)
Comparative cytogenetics of hamsters of the genus CalomyscusCytogenet Cell Genet, 88
M. Seabright (1971)
A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes.Lancet, 2 7731
K. Matsubara, C. Nishida-Umehara, K. Tsuchiya, Daiki Nukaya, Y. Matsuda (2004)
Karyotypic Evolution of Apodemus (Muridae, Rodentia) Inferred from Comparative FISH AnalysesChromosome Research, 12
The laboratory mouse (Mus musculus, 2n = 40), the Chinese hamster (Cricetulus griseus, 2n = 22), and the golden (Syrian) hamster (Mesocricetus auratus, 2n = 44) are common laboratory animals, extensively used in biomedical research. In contrast with the mouse genome, which was sequenced and well characterized, the hamster species has been set aside. We constructed a chromosome paint set for the golden hamster, which for the first time allowed us to perform multidirectional chromosome painting between the golden hamster and the mouse and between the two species of hamster. From these data we constructed a detailed comparative chromosome map of the laboratory mouse and the two hamster species. The golden hamster painting probes revealed 25 autosomal segments in the Chinese hamster and 43 in the mouse. Using the Chinese hamster probes, 23 conserved segments were found in the golden hamster karyotype. The mouse probes revealed 42 conserved autosomal segments in the golden hamster karyotype. The two largest chromosomes of the Chinese hamster (1 and 2) are homologous to seven and five chromosomes of the golden hamster, respectively. The golden hamster karyotype can be transformed into the Chinese hamster karyotype by 15 fusions and 3 fissions. Previous reconstructions of the ancestral murid karyotype proposed diploid numbers from 2n = 52 to 2n = 54. By integrating the new multidirectional chromosome painting data presented here with previous comparative genomics data, we can propose that syntenies to mouse Chrs 6 and 16 were both present and to hypothesize a diploid number of 2n = 48 for the ancestral Murinae/Cricetinae karyotype.
Mammalian Genome – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 1, 2006
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.