Reappraisal of Penrose drain stabilization

Reappraisal of Penrose drain stabilization Eur J Plast Surg (2004) 27:46 DOI 10.1007/s00238-003-0581-y LE TT ER TO T H E E DITOR N. Sarifakioglu · G. Aslan · A. Terzioglu · F. Bingul Received: 25 August 2003 / Accepted: 3 November 2003 / Published online: 10 March 2004 Springer-Verlag 2004 Dear Sir, To diminish dead space after post-surgical closure, drains are often used in reconstructive, head and neck surgery. As rubber or vacuum silicone drains have a rigid struc- ture, they can be sutured easily. The defect occurring after the removal of the drain and its attachment frequently heals secondarily. In this situation, early revision or late- scar correction surgery are rarely required. Penrose drains of various sizes can be used when indicated. Since these drains have a fairly soft and slippery structure, they can be removed easily and this results in a temporary defect in the area where they have placed. As there is secondary healing of the drain site, scar revision may be required (especially in the parotid and facial areas). Although they stay in place better than rigid drains and can be sutured easily, secondary wound closure is the main problem. If the drains which are placed into the parotid or head and neck regions have little or no leakage after 48 h, they are Fig. 1A–F Diagram of fixation of the drain and closure of the wound with mattress suture after removal of the drain . A–C (upper removed, and the remaining skin defect heals secondarily. row), closure of the wound with mattress suture, insertion of the Srirompotong and Srirompotong suggest that retention drain and tying the knot; D–F (lower row), fixation of the drain and of a drain over the long term may cause emphysema in the closure of the wound after removal of the drain head and neck region [1]. The areas in which the drain has been placed may be mobile, and because of the movement of the facial structures the drain scar may expand and easy closure of the skin defect after drain removal. Many widen. authors may have used this method in the past. However, To overcome this problem, nylon sutures were used to there have been no data in the literature regarding secure the Penrose drains. In this technique a horizontal stabilization of the Penrose drain or the knotting tech- mattress suture was tied around the Penrose drain and, nique as described above. after a loop, the suture perforated the drain and secured it We suggest that this attachment technique may be used onto the operative field. After removal of the drain, the to obtain an acceptable scar in regions such as perioral remaining suture closes the defect without need for any and/or parotid cheek areas in which we have placed local anesthesia (Fig. 1). With this technique, we can Penrose drains. We wish to bring this simple, beneficial, provide both attachment for the drain on mobile areas and effective, and old knotting technique to the surgeon’s attention. N. Sarifakioglu ( ) · G. Aslan · A. Terzioglu · F. Bingul Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, References Cebeci, Ankara, Turkey e-mail: nsarifakioglu@yahoo.com 1. Srirompotong S, Srirompotong S (2002) Surgical emphysema Tel.: +90-312-2126262, Fax: +90-312-2213276 following intraoral drainage of buccal space abscess. J Med Assoc Thai 85(12):1314–1316 N. Sarifakioglu Angera Evleri, F-6 Blok No: 40, 06800 Beysukent, Ankara, Turkey http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Journals

Reappraisal of Penrose drain stabilization

Free
1 page

Loading next page...
1 Page
 
/lp/springer_journal/reappraisal-of-penrose-drain-stabilization-20Bku1QDup
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by Springer-Verlag
Subject
Medicine
ISSN
0930-343X
eISSN
1435-0130
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00238-003-0581-y
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Eur J Plast Surg (2004) 27:46 DOI 10.1007/s00238-003-0581-y LE TT ER TO T H E E DITOR N. Sarifakioglu · G. Aslan · A. Terzioglu · F. Bingul Received: 25 August 2003 / Accepted: 3 November 2003 / Published online: 10 March 2004 Springer-Verlag 2004 Dear Sir, To diminish dead space after post-surgical closure, drains are often used in reconstructive, head and neck surgery. As rubber or vacuum silicone drains have a rigid struc- ture, they can be sutured easily. The defect occurring after the removal of the drain and its attachment frequently heals secondarily. In this situation, early revision or late- scar correction surgery are rarely required. Penrose drains of various sizes can be used when indicated. Since these drains have a fairly soft and slippery structure, they can be removed easily and this results in a temporary defect in the area where they have placed. As there is secondary healing of the drain site, scar revision may be required (especially in the parotid and facial areas). Although they stay in place better than rigid drains and can be sutured easily, secondary wound closure is the main problem. If the drains which are placed into the parotid or head and neck regions have little or no leakage after 48 h, they are Fig. 1A–F Diagram of fixation of the drain and closure of the wound with mattress suture after removal of the drain . A–C (upper removed, and the remaining skin defect heals secondarily. row), closure of the wound with mattress suture, insertion of the Srirompotong and Srirompotong suggest that retention drain and tying the knot; D–F (lower row), fixation of the drain and of a drain over the long term may cause emphysema in the closure of the wound after removal of the drain head and neck region [1]. The areas in which the drain has been placed may be mobile, and because of the movement of the facial structures the drain scar may expand and easy closure of the skin defect after drain removal. Many widen. authors may have used this method in the past. However, To overcome this problem, nylon sutures were used to there have been no data in the literature regarding secure the Penrose drains. In this technique a horizontal stabilization of the Penrose drain or the knotting tech- mattress suture was tied around the Penrose drain and, nique as described above. after a loop, the suture perforated the drain and secured it We suggest that this attachment technique may be used onto the operative field. After removal of the drain, the to obtain an acceptable scar in regions such as perioral remaining suture closes the defect without need for any and/or parotid cheek areas in which we have placed local anesthesia (Fig. 1). With this technique, we can Penrose drains. We wish to bring this simple, beneficial, provide both attachment for the drain on mobile areas and effective, and old knotting technique to the surgeon’s attention. N. Sarifakioglu ( ) · G. Aslan · A. Terzioglu · F. Bingul Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, References Cebeci, Ankara, Turkey e-mail: nsarifakioglu@yahoo.com 1. Srirompotong S, Srirompotong S (2002) Surgical emphysema Tel.: +90-312-2126262, Fax: +90-312-2213276 following intraoral drainage of buccal space abscess. J Med Assoc Thai 85(12):1314–1316 N. Sarifakioglu Angera Evleri, F-6 Blok No: 40, 06800 Beysukent, Ankara, Turkey

Journal

European Journal of Plastic SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Apr 1, 2004

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off