Re: Intraprocedural Distal Embolization After Femoropopliteal Angioplasty: Is There a Role for Below-the-knee Stents? A Statistical Analysis Point of View

Re: Intraprocedural Distal Embolization After Femoropopliteal Angioplasty: Is There a Role for... Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol (2017) 40:1478 DOI 10.1007/s00270-017-1728-8 LETTER TO THE EDITOR Re: Intraprocedural Distal Embolization After Femoropopliteal Angioplasty: Is There a Role for Below-the-knee Stents? A Statistical Analysis Point of View 1,2 Yousef Shahin Received: 27 April 2017 / Accepted: 19 June 2017 / Published online: 26 June 2017 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2017 To the editor: Evaluation of sparse data bias can be achieved by simple Sir, We read the article by Krokidis et al. [1] with great tabulation of the outcome or events over a group of the interest. However, their statistical analysis is inaccurate. variables. If the potential of bias is high, Firth’s penalised The authors retrospectively reviewed 1485 femoral angio- likelihood approach to address the small sample size in a plasties of which 12 cases where distal embolization logistic regression model is useful. occurred were analysed. In the statistical analysis, Krokidis Compliance with Ethical Standards et al. used multivariable logistic regression analysis of the factors that were associated with stent deployment. The Conflict of interest The corresponding author states that there is no regression model included three variables: critical limb conflict of interest. ischaemia, target vessel occlusion and single-vessel run- off. The total number of events for the outcome of interest References (stent deployment) was six which resulted in sparse data bias (too many variables for few outcomes). For the mul- 1. Krokidis M, Ali T, Hilliard N, Shaida N, Winterbottom A, Koo B, tivariable logistic regression model to be valid, at least 10 See TC. Intraprocedural distal embolization after femoropopliteal events of the outcome of interest or more are needed per angioplasty: is there a role for below-the-knee stents? Cardiovasc variable [2]. Therefore, for the regression model to be Intervent Radiol. 2017. doi:10.1007/s00270-017-1621-5. 2. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR. A correct, 30 events or more were needed. Otherwise, there is simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic potential for sparse data bias in addition to negative or regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(12):1373–9. positive regression coefficient bias within the regression model. & Yousef Shahin yousef.shahin@yahoo.co.uk NIHR Academic Clinical Fellow and Specialist Registrar in Clinical Radiology, Academic Unit of Radiology, University of Sheffield, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Springer Journals

Re: Intraprocedural Distal Embolization After Femoropopliteal Angioplasty: Is There a Role for Below-the-knee Stents? A Statistical Analysis Point of View

Free
1 page

Loading next page...
1 Page
 
/lp/springer_journal/re-intraprocedural-distal-embolization-after-femoropopliteal-hgjmWfjg7m
Publisher
Springer US
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE)
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Imaging / Radiology; Cardiology; Nuclear Medicine; Ultrasound
ISSN
0174-1551
eISSN
1432-086X
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00270-017-1728-8
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol (2017) 40:1478 DOI 10.1007/s00270-017-1728-8 LETTER TO THE EDITOR Re: Intraprocedural Distal Embolization After Femoropopliteal Angioplasty: Is There a Role for Below-the-knee Stents? A Statistical Analysis Point of View 1,2 Yousef Shahin Received: 27 April 2017 / Accepted: 19 June 2017 / Published online: 26 June 2017 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2017 To the editor: Evaluation of sparse data bias can be achieved by simple Sir, We read the article by Krokidis et al. [1] with great tabulation of the outcome or events over a group of the interest. However, their statistical analysis is inaccurate. variables. If the potential of bias is high, Firth’s penalised The authors retrospectively reviewed 1485 femoral angio- likelihood approach to address the small sample size in a plasties of which 12 cases where distal embolization logistic regression model is useful. occurred were analysed. In the statistical analysis, Krokidis Compliance with Ethical Standards et al. used multivariable logistic regression analysis of the factors that were associated with stent deployment. The Conflict of interest The corresponding author states that there is no regression model included three variables: critical limb conflict of interest. ischaemia, target vessel occlusion and single-vessel run- off. The total number of events for the outcome of interest References (stent deployment) was six which resulted in sparse data bias (too many variables for few outcomes). For the mul- 1. Krokidis M, Ali T, Hilliard N, Shaida N, Winterbottom A, Koo B, tivariable logistic regression model to be valid, at least 10 See TC. Intraprocedural distal embolization after femoropopliteal events of the outcome of interest or more are needed per angioplasty: is there a role for below-the-knee stents? Cardiovasc variable [2]. Therefore, for the regression model to be Intervent Radiol. 2017. doi:10.1007/s00270-017-1621-5. 2. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR. A correct, 30 events or more were needed. Otherwise, there is simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic potential for sparse data bias in addition to negative or regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(12):1373–9. positive regression coefficient bias within the regression model. & Yousef Shahin yousef.shahin@yahoo.co.uk NIHR Academic Clinical Fellow and Specialist Registrar in Clinical Radiology, Academic Unit of Radiology, University of Sheffield, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK

Journal

CardioVascular and Interventional RadiologySpringer Journals

Published: Jun 26, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off