Quantitative PCR: an alternative approach to detect common copy number alterations in multiple myeloma

Quantitative PCR: an alternative approach to detect common copy number alterations in multiple... Chromosome 1q gains and 13q deletions are common cytogenetic aberrations in multiple myeloma (MM) that confer a poor prognosis. There are several techniques for the targeted study of these alterations, but interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the current gold standard. The aim of the present study was to validate quantitative PCR (qPCR) as an alternative to FISH studies in CD138+-enriched plasma cells (PCs) from MM patients at diagnosis. We analyzed 1q gains and 13q deletions by qPCR in 57 and 60 MM patients, respectively. qPCR applicability was 84 and 88% for 1q and 13q, respectively. The qPCR and FISH methods had a sensitivity and specificity of 88 and 71% for 1q gains, and 79 and 100% for 13q deletions. A second qPCR assay for each region was carried out to confirm the previous results. Paired qPCR (two assays) and FISH results were available from 53 MM patients: 26 for 1q amplification and 27 for 13q deletion. qPCR assays gave concordant results (qPCR-consistent) in 20 of the 26 (77%) 1q gains and 25 of the 27 (93%) 13q deletions. Considering only the consistent data, the overall concordance among qPCR and FISH was 85 and 100% for 1q gains and 13q deletions, respectively. Our results show a substantial agreement between qPCR and the gold standard FISH technique, indicating the potential of qPCR as an alternative approach, particularly when the starting material is too scarce or cells are too damaged to obtain accurate results from FISH studies. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Annals of Hematology Springer Journals

Quantitative PCR: an alternative approach to detect common copy number alterations in multiple myeloma

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/quantitative-pcr-an-alternative-approach-to-detect-common-copy-number-5R4PTGgCzR
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Hematology; Oncology
ISSN
0939-5555
eISSN
1432-0584
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00277-017-3083-x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Chromosome 1q gains and 13q deletions are common cytogenetic aberrations in multiple myeloma (MM) that confer a poor prognosis. There are several techniques for the targeted study of these alterations, but interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the current gold standard. The aim of the present study was to validate quantitative PCR (qPCR) as an alternative to FISH studies in CD138+-enriched plasma cells (PCs) from MM patients at diagnosis. We analyzed 1q gains and 13q deletions by qPCR in 57 and 60 MM patients, respectively. qPCR applicability was 84 and 88% for 1q and 13q, respectively. The qPCR and FISH methods had a sensitivity and specificity of 88 and 71% for 1q gains, and 79 and 100% for 13q deletions. A second qPCR assay for each region was carried out to confirm the previous results. Paired qPCR (two assays) and FISH results were available from 53 MM patients: 26 for 1q amplification and 27 for 13q deletion. qPCR assays gave concordant results (qPCR-consistent) in 20 of the 26 (77%) 1q gains and 25 of the 27 (93%) 13q deletions. Considering only the consistent data, the overall concordance among qPCR and FISH was 85 and 100% for 1q gains and 13q deletions, respectively. Our results show a substantial agreement between qPCR and the gold standard FISH technique, indicating the potential of qPCR as an alternative approach, particularly when the starting material is too scarce or cells are too damaged to obtain accurate results from FISH studies.

Journal

Annals of HematologySpringer Journals

Published: Aug 2, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off