Quantitative Neuromuscular Monitoring: Current Devices, New Technological Advances, and Use in Clinical Practice

Quantitative Neuromuscular Monitoring: Current Devices, New Technological Advances, and Use in... Purpose of Review The purpose of this review is to summarize various quantitative neuromuscular monitoring modalities and describe strategies to implement them into routine practice. We will contrast these objective modalities with unreliable clinical tests and subjective techniques that expose patients to unnecessary risk associated with postoperative residual weakness. Recent Findings As major specialty societies publish guidelines and consensus statements urging anesthesiologists to utilize quantitative monitors, clinicians must familiarize themselves with this equipment. Furthermore, new monitors are emerging as the industry tries to address the need for user-friendly, reliable monitors. Summary Clinical assessment is an unacceptable technique to guide neuromuscular blockade management in patients receiving neuromuscular blocking agents. The use of a peripheral nerve stimulator can provide some information regarding the level of neuromuscular blockade in patients; however, it cannot reliably confirm adequate recovery. The use of objective, quantitative monitoring is an essential practice that helps guide the administration of neuromuscular blocking agents and excludes deleterious postoperative residual weakness. . . . Keywords Quantitative monitoring Residual muscle weakness Neuromuscular blockade Patient safety Introduction postoperative residual weakness [1, 3]. The routine use of quantitative neuromuscular monitors reduces complications Postoperative residual weakness remains a significant and un- from postoperative residual weakness http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Current Anesthesiology Reports Springer Journals

Quantitative Neuromuscular Monitoring: Current Devices, New Technological Advances, and Use in Clinical Practice

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/quantitative-neuromuscular-monitoring-current-devices-new-oIBlP5DoXn
Publisher
Springer US
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Anesthesiology; Intensive / Critical Care Medicine; Internal Medicine
eISSN
2167-6275
D.O.I.
10.1007/s40140-018-0261-x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose of Review The purpose of this review is to summarize various quantitative neuromuscular monitoring modalities and describe strategies to implement them into routine practice. We will contrast these objective modalities with unreliable clinical tests and subjective techniques that expose patients to unnecessary risk associated with postoperative residual weakness. Recent Findings As major specialty societies publish guidelines and consensus statements urging anesthesiologists to utilize quantitative monitors, clinicians must familiarize themselves with this equipment. Furthermore, new monitors are emerging as the industry tries to address the need for user-friendly, reliable monitors. Summary Clinical assessment is an unacceptable technique to guide neuromuscular blockade management in patients receiving neuromuscular blocking agents. The use of a peripheral nerve stimulator can provide some information regarding the level of neuromuscular blockade in patients; however, it cannot reliably confirm adequate recovery. The use of objective, quantitative monitoring is an essential practice that helps guide the administration of neuromuscular blocking agents and excludes deleterious postoperative residual weakness. . . . Keywords Quantitative monitoring Residual muscle weakness Neuromuscular blockade Patient safety Introduction postoperative residual weakness [1, 3]. The routine use of quantitative neuromuscular monitors reduces complications Postoperative residual weakness remains a significant and un- from postoperative residual weakness

Journal

Current Anesthesiology ReportsSpringer Journals

Published: Apr 11, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off