Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Quantifying the psychological value of goal achievement

Quantifying the psychological value of goal achievement It is often assumed that people put forth the least amount of effort necessary to obtain a reward. This assumption is consistent with so-called “rational” economic models of behavior. Yet these models rarely take into account the motivating effects of goals, which may lead to departures from objective reward maximizing behavior. We present an experiment in which people make a series of prioritization decisions whilst pursuing two approach or avoidance goals. Participants were rewarded $10 if they achieved both goals on a randomly selected trial, and either $0, $2.50, $5, $7.50, or $10 if they achieved only one. Bayesian parameter estimation was used to examine the subjective values that people placed on various goal achievement outcomes. The results suggested that people often discounted the achievement of the first goal, relative to a reward maximizing model, particularly when pursuing avoidance goals. These results were most evident among participants who could obtain the full reward after achieving just one goal, yet behaved as if achieving one goal was only half as valuable as achieving both. Our findings question the notion that people put forth the least amount of effort required to obtain a reward. They suggest that when tasks have explicit goals, people may even sacrifice financial reward to achieve the goals. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Springer Journals

Quantifying the psychological value of goal achievement

Download PDF
9 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/quantifying-the-psychological-value-of-goal-achievement-0TfEyXtv9F
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Subject
Psychology; Cognitive Psychology
ISSN
1069-9384
eISSN
1531-5320
DOI
10.3758/s13423-017-1329-1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

It is often assumed that people put forth the least amount of effort necessary to obtain a reward. This assumption is consistent with so-called “rational” economic models of behavior. Yet these models rarely take into account the motivating effects of goals, which may lead to departures from objective reward maximizing behavior. We present an experiment in which people make a series of prioritization decisions whilst pursuing two approach or avoidance goals. Participants were rewarded $10 if they achieved both goals on a randomly selected trial, and either $0, $2.50, $5, $7.50, or $10 if they achieved only one. Bayesian parameter estimation was used to examine the subjective values that people placed on various goal achievement outcomes. The results suggested that people often discounted the achievement of the first goal, relative to a reward maximizing model, particularly when pursuing avoidance goals. These results were most evident among participants who could obtain the full reward after achieving just one goal, yet behaved as if achieving one goal was only half as valuable as achieving both. Our findings question the notion that people put forth the least amount of effort required to obtain a reward. They suggest that when tasks have explicit goals, people may even sacrifice financial reward to achieve the goals.

Journal

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review – Springer Journals

Published: Jul 6, 2017

References

  • An integrative, formal model of motivation and decision making: The MGPM*
    Ballard, T; Yeo, G; Loft, S; Vancouver, JB; Neal, A
  • Departures from optimality when pursuing multiple approach or avoidance goals
    Ballard, T; Yeo, G; Neal, A; Farrell, S
  • Bad is stronger than good
    Baumeister, RF; Bratslavsky, E; Finkenauer, C; Vohs, KD
  • Motivation and cognitive control: From behavior to neural mechanism
    Botvinick, M; Braver, T
  • Personal goals and subjective well-being: A longitudinal study
    Brunstein, JC
  • Dopamine enhances willingness to exert effort for reward in Parkinson’s disease
    Chong, TTJ; Bonnelle, V; Manohar, S; Veromann, KR; Muhammed, K; Tofaris, GK; Husain, M
  • A nondegenerate penalized likelihood estimator for variance parameters in multilevel models
    Chung, Y; Rabe-Hesketh, S; Dorie, V; Gelman, A; Liu, J
  • Pay enough or don’t pay at all
    Gneezy, U; Rustichini, A
  • Goals as reference points
    Heath, C; Larrick, RP; Wu, G
  • Rewards, experience and decision costs in first price auctions
    James, W
  • Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
    Kahneman, D; Tversky, A
  • Bayes factors
    Kass, RE; Raftery, AE
  • Dynamics of self-regulation: How (un)accomplished goal actions affect motivation
    Koo, M; Fishbach, A
  • A labor/leisure tradeoff in cognitive control
    Kool, W; Botvinick, M
  • Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand
    Kool, W; McGuire, JT; Rosen, ZB; Botvinick, MM
  • Sleep deprivation alters effort discounting but not delay discounting of monetary rewards
    Libedinsky, C; Massar, SAA; Ling, A; Chee, W; Huettel, SA; Chee, MWL
  • Self-regulation at work
    Lord, RG; Diefendorff, JM; Schmidt, AM; Hall, RJ
  • Dynamics of multiple-goal pursuit
    Louro, MJ; Pieters, R; Zeelenberg, M
  • Dynamic self-regulation and multiple-goal pursuit
    Neal, A; Ballard, T; Vancouver, JB
  • What to do? The effects of discrepancies, incentives, and time on dynamic goal prioritization
    Schmidt, AM; DeShon, RP
  • Something’s got to give: The effects of dual-goal difficulty, goal progress, and expectancies on resource allocation
    Schmidt, AM; Dolis, CM
  • A matter of time: Individual differences, contextual dynamics, and goal progress effects on multiple-goal self-regulation
    Schmidt, AM; Dolis, CM; Tolli, AP
  • Pursuing personal goals: Skills enable progress, but not all progress is beneficial
    Sheldon, KM; Kasser, T
  • The expected value of control: An integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function
    Shenhav, A; Botvinick, MM; Cohen, J
  • Experimental economics: Induced value theory
    Smith, VL
  • Microeconomic systems as an experimental science
    Smith, VL
  • Goal setting: A meta-analytic examination of the empirical evidence
    Tubbs, ME
  • Multiple goals: A review and derivation of general principles
    Unsworth, K; Yeo, G; Beck, J
  • A formal, computational theory of multiple-goal pursuit: Integrating goal-choice and goal-striving processes
    Vancouver, JB; Weinhardt, JM; Schmidt, AM
  • A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values
    Wagenmakers, EJ
  • A tri-reference point theory of decision making under risk
    Wang, XT; Johnson, JG
  • What is the subjective cost of cognitive effort? Load, trait, and aging effects revealed by economic preference
    Westbrook, A; Kester, D; Braver, TS