www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Quantifying birefringence in the bovine model of early osteoarthritis using polarisation-sensitive optical Received: 25 October 2017 coherence tomography and Accepted: 24 April 2018 Published: xx xx xxxx mechanical indentation 1 1 2 2 Matthew Goodwin , Bastian Bräuer , Stephen Lewis , Ashvin Thambyah & Frédérique Vanholsbeeck Recent studies have shown potential for using polarisation sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT) to study cartilage morphology, and to be potentially used as an in vivo, non-invasive tool for detecting osteoarthritic changes. However, there has been relatively limited ability of this method to quantify the subtle changes that occur in the early stages of cartilage degeneration. An established mechanical indenting technique that has previously been used to examine the microstructural response of articular cartilage was employed to fix the bovine samples in an indented state. The samples were subject to creep loading with a constant compressive stress of 4.5 MPa and, when imaged using PS-OCT, enabled birefringent banding patterns to be observed. The magnitude of the birefringence was quantified using the birefringence coefficient (BRC) and statistical analysis revealed that PS-OCT is able to detect and quantify significant changes between healthy and early osteoarthritic cartilage (p < 0.001). This presents a novel utilization of PS-OCT for future development as an in vivo assessment tool. Osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating disease that ae ff cts articulating joints, in which there is a gradual wearing away of the aneural cartilage covering the bone ends, resulting in pain. A standard clinical diagnosis of OA is 1,2 made via weight bearing X-rays, in which joint space narrowing is seen as the hallmark sign of cartilage loss . Cartilage being aneural typically means that diagnosis of OA is often too late, and for the patient the options 3,4 frequently are standard analgesics, or when that is ineffective, total joint replacement surgery . There is no cure for OA, and prevention strategies are highly limited. Many believe one of the major obstacles in OA research is in determining the early or even pre-OA state of the joint. Such a joint would appear to have normal full thickness cartilage but changes at the micro-to-nano scales. In the very early stages of cartilage degeneration, proteoglycan depletion coupled with alterations in the collagen fibril network results in swelling and increased tissue perme- ability . The intrinsic repair capability of articular cartilage is highly limited and, once exhausted, destruction of the extracellular matrix (ECM) ensues . ECM destruction is one of the first macroscopic signs of OA and articular cartilage (AC) surface integrity is considered one of the key biomarkers to quantify OA progression . The chal- lenge for most OA researchers, especially in the imaging domain, would be to develop ways in which this early and very mild cartilage degeneration is detected. To this end, two recent developments have arisen that also provide the motivation for this study. First, is the recent validation of an animal model for early OA, in which bovine patella cartilage tissue with mild degeneration 8,9 has been studied extensively both structurally and mechanically . These studies have established that the colla- gen matrix fibrillar-scale ‘destructuring’ takes place as an initial stage of the degenerative process. The second development is the emergence of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) as a real-time, non-invasive, high resolution imaging technique for articular cartilage structure and health. Similar to ultrasound, The Dodd-Walls Centre for Photonic and Quantum Technologies, Department of Physics, The University of Auckland, Private Bag, 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, The University of Auckland, Private Bag, 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.G. (email: email@example.com) SCiEnTifiC REPO R TS | (2018) 8:8568 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-25982-9 1 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 1. (a) Plot of measured retardation (data points) with standard deviation and set retardation for an optical axis of 20°, (b) polar plot of measured retardation versus set retardation for fixed fast axis orientations. e cir Th cumference of the half circle indicates the optical axis. conventional OCT images are created by detecting the intensity of backscattered light. Many studies have been published using OCT to evaluate cartilage degeneration and while most show promising correlation with an established cartilage assessment scheme, the lack of accurate parameters and issues regarding reliability means the 10–14 indisputable differentiation between healthy and early degenerative cartilage remains elusive . Polarisation-sensitive OCT (PS-OCT) is a development of OCT where the polarisation state of the backs- cattered light is measured, enabling the detection of tissue birefringence. Tissue birefringence is dependent on collagen fibre organisation and orientation. Drexler et al . linked the loss of birefringence with the early stages of cartilage degeneration using polarised light microscopy . Other groups built upon this research and confirmed 16–18 the findings with OCT that a decrease in birefringence is associated with increasing cartilage degeneration . A recent study by Brill et al. parameterised and quantified human cartilage degeneration using PS-OCT . While the results demonstrated that PS-OCT parameters may be of some additional diagnostic assistance, the most significant parameters were those derived from the intensity based OCT data. The authors noted that the major - ity of individual PS-OCT parameters such as birefringence or banding characteristics seemed to be unrelated to the samples’ degree of degeneration. However, this study had two important limitations, the first was the small sample size (13 osteochondral samples from four patients) and the second was that the samples were sourced from patients who underwent total knee replacement surgery due to severe OA. These issues we believe may be overcome by the use of the above-mentioned bovine model of early OA, which provides a virtually limitless supply of cartilage tissue with mild degeneration and, with it, well established micro-to-fibrillar level structural changes. While histology is considered the gold standard of cartilage degeneration assessment, many studies have incorporated techniques that enable the determination of biomechanical properties as this may allow a more 20–23 comprehensive assessment of OA . Scanning electron micrographs of mechanically indented cartilage have revealed that during early cartilage degeneration, the collagen network is disrupted and the fibres begin to aggre- gate leading to a reduction in structural integrity of the ECM . We propose that by studying the cartilage tissue in its mechanical compressed state, any alteration of the cartilage microstructure will become detectable by PS-OCT. Therefore, in this exploratory study, OCT and mechanical indentation are used to detect signal differences between healthy bovine cartilage and ‘healthy-appearing’ cartilage with known b fi rillar-scale de-structuring asso- ciated with early stages of OA. Results Phase evaluation. The performance of the system was evaluated using a Berek compensator to measure known polarisation states. The compensator allows the operator to set, both, the optical axis φ and retardation θ independently of each other. First, the optic axis was fixed and the retardation was varied from 0° to 180° in increments of 10°. Figure 1(a) shows a plot of measured retardation angles versus set retardation at the Berek. e Th measured values are in good agreement with the theory (solid line) with a maximum standard deviation of 1.4° at φ = 20° set optical axis. Five repeated measurements were taken with a mean standard deviation of 0.7°. Second, we measured the retardation for a range of optical axis orientations varied from 0° to 180° in increments of 10°, while the retardation was varied from 0° to 90° in 15° increments. Again, the measured set of values agree well with a mean standard deviation of 1.6° (Fig. 1b). Image phase analysis. Out of the 26 samples, 10 were healthy (G0), 8 had mild degeneration (G1), and 8 had moderate degeneration (G2). All samples underwent compression using the indentation device. Since the PS-OCT setup detects orthogonal phase amplitudes we can obtain intensity (Fig. 2a) and phase images (Fig. 2b). e sys Th tem has a phase wrap, the retardation gradient was calculated as the cumulative, absolute phase change divided by the depth of the smoothed profile (see method) (Fig. 2c). PS-OCT images were taken in three different locations on the cartilage corresponding to three areas of interest (Fig. 3). From the images of the indented region (Fig. 3) and the data from Table 1, it appears that there is a reduction in birefringence with increasing degeneration. Calculating the retardation gradient has confirmed that a statisti- cally significant (p < 0.001) relationship between healthy (G0) and early OA (G1 and G2) indented cartilage exists (Fig. 4a) with the mean retardation gradient for healthy of 3.0 ± 0.5 radians per millimeter. Mild and moderate OA degeneration had a mean retardation gradient of 1.7 ± 0.3 and 1.8 ± 0.7 radians per millimeter respectively SCiEnTifiC REPO R TS | (2018) 8:8568 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-25982-9 2 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 2. (a) Intensity image of an indented healthy (G0) cartilage sample. (b) Phase image of the same sample with the averaging window indicated by the red lines. (c) Phase profile showing the original, averaged, and smoothed data. Figure 3. Retardation image obtained from our PS-OCT system images showing the characteristic patterns observed. The healthy cartilage (G0) exhibits strong optical activity when imaged in the indented section and with increasing degeneration, the optical activity decreases. Colour and scale bar correspond to all images. XZ - Indented XZ - Non-indented XY G0 3.0 ± 0.5 1.1 ± 0.5 5.2 ± 1.0 G1 1.7 ± 0.4 1.2 ± 0.3 4.9 ± 1.0 G2 1.8 ± 0.7 1.3 ± 0.5 5.4 ± 1.5 Anova P-value <0.001 0.770 0.693 G0 vs. G1 *** ns ns Post-hoc testing G0 vs. G2 ** ns ns G1 vs. G2 ns ns ns Table 1. Summary of results for phase analysis calculating the retardation gradient in various imaging planes. Values are given in radians per millimeter and expressed in the form: mean ± standard deviation. Levels of significance are indicated by: ***p-values of p ≤ 0.001, **p-values of 0.001 < p ≤ 0.01, ns - not significant. SCiEnTifiC REPO R TS | (2018) 8:8568 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-25982-9 3 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 4. (a) Boxplot showing results from phase analysis for PS-OCT images taken in the XZ - indented region. Results show there is very strong statistical significance between healthy (G0) and mildly degenerate cartilage (G1) (***p value < 0.001) and a strong significance between healthy and moderately degenerate (G2) cartilage (**p value < 0.01). (b) Boxplot showing results from phase analysis for images taken in the XZ - non indented region. (c) Boxplot showing results from phase analysis for XY plane images. No significant relationship exists between healthy and OA states for non-indented and XY plane images. (Table 1). Whereas, images obtained from imaging in the non-indented region in the XZ plane and images in the XY plane show very little difference with increasing degeneration (Fig. 3). Phase analysis showed that there is no statistical significance between any of the three groups investigated (Fig. 4b and c). Discussion The most important findings of this study is that the results agree with literature that previously stated there is little relationship between the optical properties of cartilage and the degree of degeneration without the use of indentation. Coupling PS-OCT with mechanical loading has shown that there is a significant relationship between the observed birefringence and the, subjectively graded, health state of the cartilage. Previous studies that have examined OA degeneration in cartilage have discussed using the retardation gradient as a parameter to quantifying cartilage degeneration, but none have been successful in finding a method that produces statistically 19,24 significant results . As mentioned above, one of the key points of conflict in previous literature is whether or not cartilage degen- eration ae ff cts the optical activity observed using PS-OCT. Xie et al . investigated the birefringent characteristics associated with cartilage degeneration and found that bovine samples exhibit very little polarisation sensitivity in both healthy and early degenerate samples . The authors’ noted that only in the later stages of degeneration were birefringent banding patterns present and could be used to differentiate severe degeneration from early degenerative and healthy samples. Furthermore, Xie et al. found topographical variations of polarisation sensi- tivity exist within the bovine articular joint found that the presence or absence of optical activity was unrelated to the degree of degeneration . However, other studies have established the opposite; banding patterns are present 16,18,27 with healthy samples and are lost with increasing cartilage degeneration . As a result, the specific methodol- ogy and intra-cartilage variation may have lead to misinterpretation of characteristic birefringent patterns with increasing degeneration. Ugryumova et al. identified that as equine cartilage is rotated in the sagittal plane, banding patterns can be observed due to the deep zone fibre alignment no longer being parallel with the incident light . Simiarly, Xie et al. demonstrated that bovine cartilage shows very little polarisation sensitivity when imaged in the XZ plane but when rotated to image the XY plane, a strong banding pattern was present due to the highly aligned deep zone fibres . The believed reason for the apparent non-birefringence of the sample when scanned in the XZ plane is that the incident light is parallel to the deep-zone fibre orientation. Therefore the light travels through as if the cartilage is isotropic . During mechanical loading of healthy cartilage, the collagen fibre alignment becomes non parallel in relation to the optical axis leading to an observable birefringent signal. It is believed that with degen- erative samples the loss of alignment and/or decreased integrity of the collagen matrix results in a non-uniform deformation of the collagen fibres leading to a decrease in the birefringence observed when indented. In line with our results, several studies that also use cartilage samples from large animals (bovine, equine) fail 24–26,28 to show optical activity when imaging normal to the surface (XZ plane) without any form of indentation . In 16,18 contrast, studies using healthy human samples have observed strong birefringent patterns . It remains unclear why banding patterns are seen in non-modified human cartilage yet absent in bovine. Jahr et al . suggested these discrepancies may be due to species specific differences . In support of this view, Pederson et al. found that the superficial zone of human articular cartilage is thicker than that of bovine articular cartilage which may explain the differences observed . It would be beneficial for future experiments to determine any correlation between bovine and human cartilage using PS-OCT and mechanical indentation. One of the main limitations of our study is the analysis process requires user input. The indented XZ images shown in Fig. 3 have asymmetrical banding patterns around the center bulge and hence the A-scan selection will influence the magnitude of the BRC. In order to minimize this, the same approximate location on each image was used for analysis. Furthermore, until the differences between human and bovine cartilage have been reconciled, the transferability of the results remains limited. SCiEnTifiC REPO R TS | (2018) 8:8568 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-25982-9 4 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 5. Diagram of the PS-OCT setup used. 1310: 1310 nm light source, SMF: Single Mode Fibre, 90/10: 90/10 Fibre coupler, Circ: Circulator, 50/50: 50/50 Fibre coupler, FC: Collimator, PC: Polarisation Controller, BS: 50/50 Beam Splitter, L: 50 mm lens, M: Mirror, PBS: Polarisation Beam Splitter, QWP: Quarter Wave Plate. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that differentiation of healthy from early degenerative cartilage using PS-OCT is possible. Using mechanical indentation, optical activity can be induced in cartilage samples that would otherwise exhibit anisotropy. The magnitude of the induced birefringence is related to the samples degree of degeneration, allowing clinically useful information to be obtained. Our study provides the basis for future stud- ies to build upon and determine the diagnostic value of this technique. Methods Polarisation-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography. Images were taken using an in-house built swept-source PS-OCT system which uses a combination of fibre components and free space optics (Fig. 5 ). A commercially available swept source laser source was used (AXP50125-6, Axsun Technologies Inc, Billerica, Massachusetts) that has a central wavelength of 1310 nm, a bandwidth of 100 nm, a 50 kHz sweep rate, and has an average output power of 41 mW. e Th system has an axial resolution of 10 μm in air according to the spectrum, a lateral resolution of 20 μm and the optical power incident on the sample was measured to be 11 mW. e o Th ptical beam is split into the sample and reference arm using a 90/10 fibre optic coupler. In the sample arm, a quarter wave plate (QWP) is used to circularly polarise the incident light. This helps ensure the phase measurements are independent of sample rotation . Upon reflection in the sample arm, the light is split into orthogonal polarisa- tion states through the use of a polarizing beamsplitter and coupled into two single mode fibres. In the reference arm the light is split by a non-polarizing beamsplitter to enable the path length of each polarisation state to be adjusted independently. The orthogonal components from the sample interfere with one of the reference arms each. A bal - anced photodetector is used to detect the amplitude of the polarisation components A and A . V H The signal obtained from the detector is then sent for data processing and the images are reconstructed in LabView software. The reflectivity, R(z), and retardation, δ(z), can be calculated using the following formula: Rz () ∝+ Av() zAhz () (1) V δ() za = rctan A H (2) e B-s Th can images were obtained using a galvoscanner setup operating at 70 Hz with a total image width of 10 mm. Cartilage Classification. e b Th ovine patellae tissue used in this study serves as a convenient tissue source for studying early cartilage degeneration. Validated previously as a model for human early osteoarthritis , this large animal tissue is sourced from the local meat processing plant and stored at −20 degrees Celsius. e Th bovine are raised primarily for the dairy industry and are allowed to live as long as 5 to 9 years. The model allows researchers to select a range of grades of cartilage degeneration from simple visual qualitative analysis following India ink 8,31 staining . Importantly, the surface staining and subsequent grading into G0, G1 and G2, as used in the present 9,32,33 study, has previously been shown to represent deep matrix fibrillar-scale changes in the cartilage tissue . The mild to moderate degenerative changes in the cartilage surface tends to be localised to the distal-lateral quarter of the patella and can be assessed accurately by India ink staining. Following India ink staining, patella gross appear- ance was categorised using the Outerbridge classification yielding three different groups: G0 (no stain uptake and cartilage appear completely intact), G1 (mild stain uptake with slight soenin ft g and swelling of the cartilage), and G2 (with increased stain uptake and some surface fissures). Both G1 and G2 were found to be equivalent to a clinical OOCHAS score of 1 to 4, which upon further correlation with microstructure, was defined as the mildly degenerate or early osteoarthritic state . Using India ink staining, a total of 10 intact, 8 mildly degener- ate, and 8 moderately degenerate patellae were selected (Fig. 6A). A cartilage-on-bone block of approximately 14 mm × 14 mm × 14 mm was cut from the distal lateral quarter of each patella, the region for which patella classified as mildly degenerate contained the surface disruption. All the samples used in this study were obtained from a local meat processing plant. As such ethics approval was not required. SCiEnTifiC REPO R TS | (2018) 8:8568 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-25982-9 5 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 6. (A) Bovine patellae from healthy (G0), mildly degenerate (G1) and moderately degenerate (G2) samples aer I ft ndia ink was applied. Note that the India ink washes off an intact surface, but stains positive, those regions with microscopic defects. The large arrows point to regions sampled for mechanical testing with channel indentation. (B) Channel indentation involves a flat-ended stainless steel indenter compressed against cartilage – except there is a channel space (1 mm gap) in the indenter that allows the cartilage tissue to ‘bulge’ up into the channel space. (C) A series of differential interference contrast optical light microscopy images, of the cartilage-on-bone aer in ft dentation and formalin-fixation under load. Figure 7. Schematic representation of the indented cartilage samples. B-scans were taken in both the XZ and XY plane (red planes). XZ images were further classified depending on if the image was taken in the indented or non-indented region. Green planes indicate the approximate regions where gradient analysis was performed. Cartilage Indentation. e c Th artilage samples were mechanically loaded, fixed and decalcified. The loading protocol of 4.5 MPa follows that of an earlier channel-indentation . In that study the mean axial strains following creep loading at 4.5 MPa were recorded as 56% (range 39–68%). The loading magnitude of 4.5 MPa, arguably, is within the range of cartilage stresses derived from studies of the human knee in compression . The idea that the collagen network disruption in the mild to moderately degenerate tissue groups, G1 and G2, are not a result of the loading, is supported by an earlier microstructural study without mechanical loading showing that such fibrillar matrix destructuring occurs inherently in G1 and G2 tissues . The effect of the indenter can be visualised by the schematic in Fig. 7. SCiEnTifiC REPO R TS | (2018) 8:8568 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-25982-9 6 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Cartilage Preparation. e s Th ample blocks were frozen in 0.15 M saline for transport and storage until use. Prior to imaging the samples were defrosted and allowed to equilibrate in a saline bath for up to 2 hours, each sample only underwent one freeze-thaw cycle. The samples were drained on paper to remove excess fluid. Images were taken with the laser 90° to the surface (XZ plane) in the indented and non-indented regions. Images were also taken on the side of the cartilage block with the laser 0° to the surface, (XY plane) as shown in Fig. 7. e Th total measurement time (time samples were out of the saline bath) was kept under 2 minutes. Image Processing. Post-image processing was carried out using custom imaging algorithms created in MATLAB. The primary parameter used to analyse the strength of the birefringent is the retardation gradient, also known as the birefringence coefficient (BRC). The user was prompted to select the approximate A-scan where the gradient analysis was performed. A averaging window of 10 A-scans (200 μm window) was applied around the user selected point. The algorithm performed surface detection and a threshold was applied to determine the maximum imaging depth. Using the systems resolution in air and taking the refractive index of bovine cartilage as n = 1.36 the depth calculation was calibrated to the tissue. A running average was applied to smooth the phase profile between the surface and the maximum depth. The retardation gradient was calculated as the cumulative, absolute change in phase of the ‘smoothed’ data divided by its depth. This measurement was repeated across 5 adjacent B-scans (25 μm separation between each B-scan) before a final value was determined for each sample. Statistical analysis was completed through MATLAB. The assumptions of normality and equal variance were tested using the vartestn function. One way ANOVA was used to identify if any relationships existed between the three groups (G0, G1, G2) in each imaging plane using the anova1 function. Tukey’s post-hoc test was performed using the multcompare function to quantify the significance of the relationship. P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data Availability. e d Th atasets generated and analysed are available from the corresponding author on rea- sonable request. References 1. Balint, G. & Szebenyi, B. Diagnosis of osteoarthritis. Drugs 52, 1–13 (1996). 2. Link, T. M., Stahl, R. & Woertler, K. Cartilage imaging: motivation, techniques, current and future significance. European radiology 17, 1135–1146 (2007). 3. Dieppe, P. A. & Lohmander, L. S. Pathogenesis and management of pain in osteoarthritis. The Lancet 365, 965–973 (2005). 4. Roos, E. M. & Toksvig-Larsen, S. Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (koos)–validation and comparison to the womac in total knee replacement. Health and quality of life outcomes 1, 17 (2003). 5. Saarakkala, S. et al. Depth-wise progression of osteoarthritis in human articular cartilage: investigation of composition, structure and biomechanics. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 18, 73–81 (2010). 6. Nebelung, S. et al. Morphometric grading of osteoarthritis by optical coherence tomography–an ex vivo study. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 32, 1381–1388 (2014). 7. Jahr, H., Brill, N. & Nebelung, S. Detecting early stage osteoarthritis by optical coherence tomography? Biomarkers 20, 590–596 (2015). 8. Hargrave-Thomas, E., Thambyah, A., McGlashan, S. & Broom, N. The bovine patella as a model of early osteoarthritis. Journal of anatomy 223, 651–664 (2013). 9. Thambyah, A., Zhao, J.-Y., Bevill, S. L. & Broom, N. D. Macro-, micro-and ultrastructural investigation of how degeneration influences the response of cartilage to loading. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 5, 206–215 (2012). 10. Chu, C. R. et al. Arthroscopic microscopy of articular cartilage using optical coherence tomography. e Th American journal of sports medicine 32, 699–709 (2004). 11. Nebelung, S. et al. Quantitative oct and mri biomarkers for the differentiation of cartilage degeneration. Skeletal radiology 45, 505–516 (2016). 12. Nebelung, S. et al. Quantitative oct and mri biomarkers for the differentiation of cartilage degeneration. Skeletal radiology 45, 505–516 (2016). 13. Nebelung, S. et al. Three-dimensional imaging and analysis of human cartilage degeneration using optical coherence tomography. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 33, 651–659 (2015). 14. Brill, N. et al. Optical coherence tomography-based parameterization and quantification of articular cartilage surface integrity. Biomedical optics express 6, 2398–2411 (2015). 15. Drexler, W. et al. Correlation of collagen organization with polarization sensitive imaging of in vitro cartilage: implications for osteoarthritis. e J Th ournal of rheumatology 28, 1311–1318 (2001). 16. Li, X. et al. High-resolution optical coherence tomographic imaging of osteoarthritic cartilage during open knee surgery. Arthritis Res Ther 7, R318 (2005). 17. Chu, C. R. et al. Clinical optical coherence tomography of early articular cartilage degeneration in patients with degenerative meniscal tears. Arthritis & Rheumatism 62, 1412–1420 (2010). 18. Chu, C. R., Izzo, N. J., Irrgang, J. J., Ferretti, M. & Studer, R. K. Clinical diagnosis of potentially treatable early articular cartilage degeneration using optical coherence tomography. Journal of biomedical optics 12, 051703–051703 (2007). 19. Brill, N. et al. Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography-based imaging, parameterization, and quantification of human cartilage degeneration. Journal of Biomedical Optics 21, 076013–076013 (2016). 20. Huang, Y.-P. et al. An optical coherence tomography (oct)-based air jet indentation system for measuring the mechanical properties of soft tissues. Measurement science and technology 20, 015805 (2008). 21. Laasanen, M. S. et al. Ultrasound indentation of bovine knee articular cartilage in situ. Journal of biomechanics 36, 1259–1267 (2003). 22. Nebelung, S. et al. Towards optical coherence tomography-based elastographic evaluation of human cartilage. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 56, 106–119 (2016). 23. Laasanen, M. et al. Novel mechano-acoustic technique and instrument for diagnosis of cartilage degeneration. Physiological measurement 23, 491 (2002). 24. Xie, T., Guo, S., Zhang, J., Chen, Z. & Peavy, G. M. Use of polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography to determine the directional polarization sensitivity of articular cartilage and meniscus. Journal of biomedical optics 11, 064001–064001 (2006). 25. Xie, T., Guo, S., Zhang, J., Chen, Z. & Peavy, G. M. Determination of characteristics of degenerative joint disease using optical coherence tomography and polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography. Lasers in surgery and medicine 38, 852–865 (2006). 26. Xie, T. et al. Topographical variations in the polarization sensitivity of articular cartilage as determined by polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography and polarized light microscopy. Journal of biomedical optics 13, 054034–054034 (2008). SCiEnTifiC REPO R TS | (2018) 8:8568 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-25982-9 7 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ 27. Herrmann, J. M. et al. High resolution imaging of normal and osteoarthritic cartilage with optical coherence tomography. The Journal of rheumatology 26, 627–635 (1999). 28. Ugryumova, N., Attenburrow, D. P., Winlove, C. P. & Matcher, S. J. The collagen structure of equine articular cartilage, characterized using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 38, 2612 (2005). 29. Pedersen, D. R., Goetz, J. E., Kurriger, G. L. & Martin, J. A. Comparative digital cartilage histology for human and common osteoarthritis models. Orthopedic research and reviews 2013, 13 (2013). 30. Götzinger, E., Baumann, B., Pircher, M. & Hitzenberger, C. K. Polarization maintaining fiber based ultra-high resolution spectral domain polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography. Optics express 17, 22704–22717 (2009). 31. Outerbridge, R. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43 (1961). 32. Thambyah, A. & Broom, N. On how degeneration influences load-bearing in the cartilage–bone system: a microstructural and micromechanical study. Osteoarthritis and cartilage 15, 1410–1423 (2007). 33. a Th mbyah, A., Zhao, L. & Broom, N. Microstructural response and fluid flow mechanisms in cartilage loading: new insights using a novel indentation method. e J Th ournal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design 44, 319–326 (2009). 34. Pritzker, K. et al. Osteoarthritis cartilage histopathology: grading and staging. Osteoarthritis and cartilage 14, 13–29 (2006). 35. Thambyah, A., Goh, J. C. & De, S. D. Contact stresses in the knee joint in deep flexion. Medical engineering & physics 27, 329–335 (2005). 36. Wang, S.-Z., Huang, Y.-P., Wang, Q., Zheng, Y.-P. & He, Y.-H. Assessment of depth and degeneration dependences of articular cartilage refractive index using optical coherence tomography in vitro. Connective tissue research 51, 36–47 (2010). Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge funding from Marsden Fund and Royal Society of New Zealand (UoA1509) which made this research possible. Author Contributions M.G. Analysed the data, M.G. and S.L. conducted the experiments, B.B. calibrated the imaging system, A.T. prepared the cartilage samples, F.V. conceived the experiments and obtained funding for the research. A.T. and F.V. supervised the research. All authors interpreted the results and proofread the manuscript. Additional Information Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Cre- ative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not per- mitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. © The Author(s) 2018 SCiEnTifiC REPO R TS | (2018) 8:8568 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-25982-9 8
Scientific Reports – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 5, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera