Public Attitudes Toward Social Spending in the United States: The Differences Between Direct Spending and Tax Expenditures

Public Attitudes Toward Social Spending in the United States: The Differences Between Direct... This paper uses a survey experiment to examine differences in public attitudes toward ‘direct’ and ‘indirect’ government spending. Federal social welfare spending in the USA has two components: the federal government spends money to directly provide social benefits to citizens, and also indirectly subsidizes the private provision of social benefits through tax expenditures. Though benefits provided through tax expenditures are considered spending for budgetary purposes, they differ from direct spending in several ways: in the mechanisms through which benefits are delivered to citizens, in how they distribute wealth across the income spectrum, and in the visibility of their policy consequences to the mass public. We develop and test a model explaining how these differences will affect public attitudes toward spending conducted through direct and indirect means. We find that support for otherwise identical social programs is generally higher when such programs are portrayed as being delivered through tax expenditures than when they are portrayed as being delivered by direct spending. In addition, support for tax expenditure programs which redistribute wealth upward drops when citizens are provided information about the redistributive effects. Both of these results are conditioned by partisanship, with the opinions of Republicans more sensitive to the mechanism through which benefits are delivered, and the opinions of Democrats more sensitive to information about their redistributive effects. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Political Behavior Springer Journals

Public Attitudes Toward Social Spending in the United States: The Differences Between Direct Spending and Tax Expenditures

24 pages
Read Article
Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/public-attitudes-toward-social-spending-in-the-united-states-the-W0qJHZibu0
Publisher
Springer US
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by Springer Science+Business Media New York
Subject
Social Sciences, general; Political Science, general; Sociology, general
ISSN
0190-9320
eISSN
1573-6687
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11109-013-9225-5
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper uses a survey experiment to examine differences in public attitudes toward ‘direct’ and ‘indirect’ government spending. Federal social welfare spending in the USA has two components: the federal government spends money to directly provide social benefits to citizens, and also indirectly subsidizes the private provision of social benefits through tax expenditures. Though benefits provided through tax expenditures are considered spending for budgetary purposes, they differ from direct spending in several ways: in the mechanisms through which benefits are delivered to citizens, in how they distribute wealth across the income spectrum, and in the visibility of their policy consequences to the mass public. We develop and test a model explaining how these differences will affect public attitudes toward spending conducted through direct and indirect means. We find that support for otherwise identical social programs is generally higher when such programs are portrayed as being delivered through tax expenditures than when they are portrayed as being delivered by direct spending. In addition, support for tax expenditure programs which redistribute wealth upward drops when citizens are provided information about the redistributive effects. Both of these results are conditioned by partisanship, with the opinions of Republicans more sensitive to the mechanism through which benefits are delivered, and the opinions of Democrats more sensitive to information about their redistributive effects.

Journal

Political Behavior – Springer Journals

Published: Mar 24, 2013

References

  • Unequal democracy: The political economy of the New Gilded Age
    Bartels, L
  • How big are total individual income tax expenditures, and who benefits from them?
    Burman, LE; Geissler, C; Toder, EJ
  • Reading mixed signals: Ambivalence in public opinion about government
    Cantril, A; Cantril, SD
  • Support for the American welfare state: The views of Congress and the public
    Cook, FL; Barrett, EJ
  • Cambridge handbook of experimental political science
    Druckman, JA; Kam, C
  • Social policy and public opinion: How the ideological direction of spending influences public mood
    Ellis, CR; Faricy, C
  • Ideology in America
    Ellis, CR; Stimson, J
  • The politics of social policy in America: The causes and effects of indirect versus direct social spending
    Faricy, C
  • The political culture of ambivalence: Ideological responses to the welfare state
    Feldman, S; Zaller, J
  • The dynamics of party identification
    Franklin, CH; Jackson, JE
  • The political beliefs of Americans: A study of public opinion
    Free, LA; Cantril, H
  • Why Americans hate welfare
    Gilens, M
  • Political ignorance and collective policy preferences
    Gilens, M
  • Core principles and policy reasoning in mass publics: A test of two theories
    Goren, P
  • The divided welfare state: The battle over public and private social benefits in the United States
    Hacker, JS
  • Off center: The Republican Revolution and the erosion of American democracy
    Hacker, JS; Pierson, P
  • Winner-take-all politics
    Hacker, JS; Pierson, P
  • The hidden welfare state: Tax expenditures and social policy in the United States
    Howard, C
  • The hidden welfare state: Tax expenditures and social policy in the United States
    Howard, C
  • The welfare state nobody knows
    Howard, C
  • Framing responsibility for political issues: The case of poverty
    Iyengar, S
  • Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues
    Iyengar, S
  • Public attitudes toward government spending
    Jacoby, WG
  • Issue framing and public opinion on government spending
    Jacoby, WG
  • Who toes the party line?: Cues, values, and individual differences
    Kam, CD
  • Media framing and the dynamics of racial policy preferences
    Kellstedt, PM
  • The politics of income inequality in the United States
    Kelly, N
  • The transformation of American politics: Activist government and the rise of conservatism
    Mettler, S
  • Reconstituting the submerged state: The challenges of social policy reform in the Obama Era
    Mettler, S
  • The submerged state: How invisible government policies undermine American democracy
    Mettler, S
  • Class war? What Americans really think about economic inequality
    Page, B; Jacobs, L
  • Political trust, ideology, and public support for government spending
    Rudolph, TJ; Evans, J
  • I’m not that liberal: Explaining conservative Democratic identification
    Schiffer, AJ
  • Elite discourse and American public opinion: The case of welfare spending
    Schneider, S; Jacoby, W
  • Tax revolt: Something for nothing in California
    Sears, DO; Citrin, J
  • Degrees of democracy
    Soroka, S; Wlezien, C
  • Tides of consent
    Stimson, J
  • Pathways to tax reform: The concept of tax expenditures
    Surrey, SS
  • Partisan moods: Polarization and the dynamics of mass party preferences
    Ura, JD; Ellis, C
  • The public as thermostat: Dynamics of preferences for spending
    Wlezien, C
  • Patterns of representation: Dynamics of public preferences and policy
    Wlezien, C

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.

Try 2 weeks free now

DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

or browse the journals available

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Interested in DeepDyve for your group?
Try 2 weeks free now