Public Attitudes Toward Social Spending in the United States: The Differences Between Direct Spending and Tax Expenditures

Public Attitudes Toward Social Spending in the United States: The Differences Between Direct... This paper uses a survey experiment to examine differences in public attitudes toward ‘direct’ and ‘indirect’ government spending. Federal social welfare spending in the USA has two components: the federal government spends money to directly provide social benefits to citizens, and also indirectly subsidizes the private provision of social benefits through tax expenditures. Though benefits provided through tax expenditures are considered spending for budgetary purposes, they differ from direct spending in several ways: in the mechanisms through which benefits are delivered to citizens, in how they distribute wealth across the income spectrum, and in the visibility of their policy consequences to the mass public. We develop and test a model explaining how these differences will affect public attitudes toward spending conducted through direct and indirect means. We find that support for otherwise identical social programs is generally higher when such programs are portrayed as being delivered through tax expenditures than when they are portrayed as being delivered by direct spending. In addition, support for tax expenditure programs which redistribute wealth upward drops when citizens are provided information about the redistributive effects. Both of these results are conditioned by partisanship, with the opinions of Republicans more sensitive to the mechanism through which benefits are delivered, and the opinions of Democrats more sensitive to information about their redistributive effects. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Political Behavior Springer Journals

Public Attitudes Toward Social Spending in the United States: The Differences Between Direct Spending and Tax Expenditures

24 pages
Read Article

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/public-attitudes-toward-social-spending-in-the-united-states-the-W0qJHZibu0
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by Springer Science+Business Media New York
Subject
Social Sciences, general; Political Science, general; Sociology, general
ISSN
0190-9320
eISSN
1573-6687
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11109-013-9225-5
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper uses a survey experiment to examine differences in public attitudes toward ‘direct’ and ‘indirect’ government spending. Federal social welfare spending in the USA has two components: the federal government spends money to directly provide social benefits to citizens, and also indirectly subsidizes the private provision of social benefits through tax expenditures. Though benefits provided through tax expenditures are considered spending for budgetary purposes, they differ from direct spending in several ways: in the mechanisms through which benefits are delivered to citizens, in how they distribute wealth across the income spectrum, and in the visibility of their policy consequences to the mass public. We develop and test a model explaining how these differences will affect public attitudes toward spending conducted through direct and indirect means. We find that support for otherwise identical social programs is generally higher when such programs are portrayed as being delivered through tax expenditures than when they are portrayed as being delivered by direct spending. In addition, support for tax expenditure programs which redistribute wealth upward drops when citizens are provided information about the redistributive effects. Both of these results are conditioned by partisanship, with the opinions of Republicans more sensitive to the mechanism through which benefits are delivered, and the opinions of Democrats more sensitive to information about their redistributive effects.

Journal

Political Behavior – Springer Journals

Published: Mar 24, 2013

References

  • Unequal democracy: The political economy of the New Gilded Age
    Bartels, L
  • How big are total individual income tax expenditures, and who benefits from them?
    Burman, LE; Geissler, C; Toder, EJ
  • Reading mixed signals: Ambivalence in public opinion about government
    Cantril, A; Cantril, SD
  • Support for the American welfare state: The views of Congress and the public
    Cook, FL; Barrett, EJ
  • Cambridge handbook of experimental political science
    Druckman, JA; Kam, C
  • Social policy and public opinion: How the ideological direction of spending influences public mood
    Ellis, CR; Faricy, C
  • Ideology in America
    Ellis, CR; Stimson, J
  • The politics of social policy in America: The causes and effects of indirect versus direct social spending
    Faricy, C
  • The political culture of ambivalence: Ideological responses to the welfare state
    Feldman, S; Zaller, J
  • The dynamics of party identification
    Franklin, CH; Jackson, JE
  • The political beliefs of Americans: A study of public opinion
    Free, LA; Cantril, H
  • Why Americans hate welfare
    Gilens, M
  • Political ignorance and collective policy preferences
    Gilens, M
  • Core principles and policy reasoning in mass publics: A test of two theories
    Goren, P
  • The divided welfare state: The battle over public and private social benefits in the United States
    Hacker, JS
  • Off center: The Republican Revolution and the erosion of American democracy
    Hacker, JS; Pierson, P
  • Winner-take-all politics
    Hacker, JS; Pierson, P
  • The hidden welfare state: Tax expenditures and social policy in the United States
    Howard, C
  • The hidden welfare state: Tax expenditures and social policy in the United States
    Howard, C
  • The welfare state nobody knows
    Howard, C
  • Framing responsibility for political issues: The case of poverty
    Iyengar, S
  • Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues
    Iyengar, S
  • Public attitudes toward government spending
    Jacoby, WG
  • Issue framing and public opinion on government spending
    Jacoby, WG
  • Who toes the party line?: Cues, values, and individual differences
    Kam, CD
  • Media framing and the dynamics of racial policy preferences
    Kellstedt, PM
  • The politics of income inequality in the United States
    Kelly, N
  • The transformation of American politics: Activist government and the rise of conservatism
    Mettler, S
  • Reconstituting the submerged state: The challenges of social policy reform in the Obama Era
    Mettler, S
  • The submerged state: How invisible government policies undermine American democracy
    Mettler, S
  • Class war? What Americans really think about economic inequality
    Page, B; Jacobs, L
  • Political trust, ideology, and public support for government spending
    Rudolph, TJ; Evans, J
  • I’m not that liberal: Explaining conservative Democratic identification
    Schiffer, AJ
  • Elite discourse and American public opinion: The case of welfare spending
    Schneider, S; Jacoby, W
  • Tax revolt: Something for nothing in California
    Sears, DO; Citrin, J
  • Degrees of democracy
    Soroka, S; Wlezien, C
  • Tides of consent
    Stimson, J
  • Pathways to tax reform: The concept of tax expenditures
    Surrey, SS
  • Partisan moods: Polarization and the dynamics of mass party preferences
    Ura, JD; Ellis, C
  • The public as thermostat: Dynamics of preferences for spending
    Wlezien, C
  • Patterns of representation: Dynamics of public preferences and policy
    Wlezien, C

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.

Try 2 weeks free now

DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

or browse the journals available

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off

Sign up
for free
Start 14 day
Free Trial