Qual Life Res (2018) 27:273–290 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1690-6 REVIEW Psychometric validation of the SF-36 Health Survey in ulcerative colitis: results from a systematic literature review 1 1 2 1 • • • • Aaron Yarlas Martha Bayliss Joseph C. Cappelleri Stephen Maher 2 3 4 2 • • • Andrew G. Bushmakin Lea Ann Chen Alireza Manuchehri Paul Healey Accepted: 19 August 2017 / Published online: 28 August 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Abstract SF-36 scores between subgroups of patients when classi- Purpose To conduct a systematic literature review of the ﬁed by disease activity (i.e., active versus inactive), reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the SF- symptom status, and comorbidity status. Responsiveness 36 Health Survey (SF-36) in patients with ulcerative was supported by ﬁndings of clinically meaningful changes colitis (UC). in SF-36 scores following treatment in non-comparative Methods We performed a systematic search of electronic trials, and by meaningfully larger improvements in SF-36 medical databases to identify published peer-reviewed scores in treatment arms relative to controls in randomized studies which reported scores from the eight scales and/or controlled trials. The sole study of SF-36 reliability found two summary measures of the SF-36 collected from adult evidence supporting internal consistency
Quality of Life Research – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 28, 2017
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera