Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Profiling Surgeon Performance for Breast Cancer Lumpectomy by Composite Measurement of Reoperations, Cosmetic Outcomes, and Patient Preferences

Profiling Surgeon Performance for Breast Cancer Lumpectomy by Composite Measurement of... Ann Surg Oncol (2018) 25:1943–1952 https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6479-5 OR IG INA L A R TIC L E – BREA S T O NC OLOG Y Profiling Surgeon Performance for Breast Cancer Lumpectomy by Composite Measurement of Reoperations, Cosmetic Outcomes, and Patient Preferences 1 2 2 3,4 Annie L. Dunham, MD , Luis D. Ramirez, MPH , Choua A. Vang, BS , Jared H. Linebarger, MD , and 2,4 Jeffrey Landercasper, MD Department of Medical Education, Gundersen Medical Foundation, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, La Crosse, WI; Department of Medical Research, Gundersen Medical Foundation, La Crosse, WI; 3 4 Department of Surgery, Gundersen Health System (GHS), La Crosse, WI; Norma J. Vinger Center for Breast Care, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, WI ABSTRACT adjustment, differences between surgeons were observed Background. Patients want information to search for for RORs, but not COSMs. Overall, patients reported destination of care for breast-conserving surgery (BCS). To excellent, good, fair, and poor COSMs of 55, 30, 11 and inform patients wanting a lumpectomy, we aimed to 4%, respectively. Composite star scores reflected differ- develop a pilot project that communicated composite ences in performance by surgeon, which could increase, or quality measure (QM) results http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Annals of Surgical Oncology Springer Journals

Profiling Surgeon Performance for Breast Cancer Lumpectomy by Composite Measurement of Reoperations, Cosmetic Outcomes, and Patient Preferences

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/profiling-surgeon-performance-for-breast-cancer-lumpectomy-by-VSIQiP1jaj

References (49)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Society of Surgical Oncology
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Surgical Oncology; Oncology; Surgery
ISSN
1068-9265
eISSN
1534-4681
DOI
10.1245/s10434-018-6479-5
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Ann Surg Oncol (2018) 25:1943–1952 https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6479-5 OR IG INA L A R TIC L E – BREA S T O NC OLOG Y Profiling Surgeon Performance for Breast Cancer Lumpectomy by Composite Measurement of Reoperations, Cosmetic Outcomes, and Patient Preferences 1 2 2 3,4 Annie L. Dunham, MD , Luis D. Ramirez, MPH , Choua A. Vang, BS , Jared H. Linebarger, MD , and 2,4 Jeffrey Landercasper, MD Department of Medical Education, Gundersen Medical Foundation, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, La Crosse, WI; Department of Medical Research, Gundersen Medical Foundation, La Crosse, WI; 3 4 Department of Surgery, Gundersen Health System (GHS), La Crosse, WI; Norma J. Vinger Center for Breast Care, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, WI ABSTRACT adjustment, differences between surgeons were observed Background. Patients want information to search for for RORs, but not COSMs. Overall, patients reported destination of care for breast-conserving surgery (BCS). To excellent, good, fair, and poor COSMs of 55, 30, 11 and inform patients wanting a lumpectomy, we aimed to 4%, respectively. Composite star scores reflected differ- develop a pilot project that communicated composite ences in performance by surgeon, which could increase, or quality measure (QM) results

Journal

Annals of Surgical OncologySpringer Journals

Published: Apr 18, 2018

There are no references for this article.