Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Persky, M. Daane, Ying Jin (2003)
The Nation's Report Card: Writing, 2002.
P Prior (2006)
Handbook of writing research
R. Marzano (2004)
Building Background Knowledge for Academic Achievement: Research on What Works in Schools
Jill Jeffery (2009)
Constructs of writing proficiency in US state and national writing assessments: Exploring variabilityAssessing Writing, 14
S. Graham, Karin Sandmel (2011)
The Process Writing Approach: A Meta-analysisThe Journal of Educational Research, 104
(1999)
Evaluating the writing of culturally and linguistically diverse students: The case of the African American vernacular English speaker
LS Flower, JR Hayes (1981)
Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written communication
Stephen Gabrielson, B. Gordon, G. Engelhard (1995)
The Effects of Task Choice on the Quality of Writing Obtained in a Statewide AssessmentApplied Measurement in Education, 8
(1996)
A new model of cognition and affect in writing
W. Grigg, M. Daane, Ying Jin, Jay Campbell (2003)
The Nation's Report Card: Reading, 2002.
S. Graham, K. Harris (2005)
Improving the Writing Performance of Young Struggling WritersThe Journal of Special Education, 39
S Graham, K Harris (2005)
Improving the writing performance of young struggling writers-theoretical and programmatic research from the center on accelerating student learningJournal of Special Education, 39
Tony Silva (1993)
Toward an Understanding of the Distinct Nature of L2 Writing: The ESL Research and Its ImplicationsTESOL Quarterly, 27
(1997)
Become a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective
Paul Prior (2005)
A Sociocultural Theory of Writing.
(2004)
Charting the course: States decide major provisions under No Child Left Behind
S. Raudenbush, A. Bryk (1992)
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods
L. Rogers, S. Graham (2008)
A meta-analysis of single subject design writing intervention research.Journal of Educational Psychology, 100
A. Goldberg, M. Russell, A. Cook (2003)
The Effect of Computers on Student Writing: A Meta-analysis of Studies from 1992 to 2002, 2
S. Graham, D. Perin (2007)
A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students.Journal of Educational Psychology, 99
(2007)
Writing framework and specifications for the 2007 National Assessment of Educational Progress
H. Weisberg, H. Goldstein (1988)
Multilevel Models in Educational and Social Research.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84
G. Glass (2000)
Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Review of State Policy Evidence
S. Graham, D. McKeown, Sharlene Kiuhara, K. Harris (2012)
A Meta-Analysis of Writing Instruction for Students in the Elementary Grades.Journal of Educational Psychology, 104
(1981)
Plans that guide the composing process
L. Faigley, S. Witte (1981)
Coherence, Cohesion, and Writing Quality.College Composition and Communication, 32
S. Resta, J. Eliot (1994)
Written Expression in Boys with Attention Deficit DisorderPerceptual and Motor Skills, 79
P. Moss (1994)
Validity in high stakes writing assessment: Problems and possibilitiesAssessing Writing, 1
(2008)
Genre theory: Teaching, writing, and being
AF Ball (1999)
Evaluating writing
Richard Gómez, Richard Parker, Rafael Lara-Alecio, Leo Gomez (1996)
Process Versus Product Writing with Limited English Proficient StudentsBilingual Research Journal, 20
G. Hillocks (2002)
The Testing Trap: How State Writing Assessments Control Learning
R. Bangert-Drowns (1993)
The Word Processor as an Instructional Tool: A Meta-Analysis of Word Processing in Writing InstructionReview of Educational Research, 63
(2010)
Exploring the potential of interrogating a mediated corpus of data from a national representative sampling of student writing
Ruth Wharton-McDonald, M. Pressley, Jennifer Hampston (1998)
Literacy Instruction in Nine First-Grade Classrooms: Teacher Characteristics and Student AchievementThe Elementary School Journal, 99
Geoffrey Masters, M. Forster (1997)
Literacy Standards in Australia
(2016)
A meta-analysis examining the writing characteristics of students with learning disabilities and normally achieving peers. Manuscript submitted for publication
(2010)
K-12 Writing Alignment Project
J. Abedi (2002)
Standardized Achievement Tests and English Language Learners: Psychometrics IssuesEducational Assessment, 8
(2007)
Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences
JR Hayes (1996)
The science of writing
G. Troia, Rebecca Shankland, Kimberly Wolbers (2012)
Motivation Research in Writing: Theoretical and Empirical ConsiderationsReading & Writing Quarterly, 28
D. Ferris (1994)
Lexical and Syntactic Features of ESL Writing by Students at Different Levels of L2 ProficiencyTESOL Quarterly, 28
A. Kanaris (1999)
Gendered Journeys: Children's Writing and the Construction of GenderLanguage and Education, 13
Steve Graham, Evan Fishman, R. Reid, Michael Hebert (2016)
Writing Characteristics of Students with Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder: A Meta–AnalysisLearning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31
(1992)
Spoken and written language relationships in language/learning children
R. Linn, E. Baker, Damian Betebenner (2002)
Accountability Systems: Implications of Requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001Educational Researcher, 31
(2009)
The effects of writing workshop instruction on the performance and motivation of good and poor writers
M. Whiteman (2013)
Writing: The Nature, Development, and Teaching of Written Communication. Volume 1, Variation in Writing: Functional and Linguistic-Cultural Differences.
(2012)
The research evidence on writing
S. Lubienski, C. Lubienski (2006)
School Sector and Academic Achievement: A Multilevel Analysis of NAEP Mathematics DataAmerican Educational Research Journal, 43
(2007)
Secondary analysis for public health: A practical guide
Samuel Totten (2004)
Book Review of The Neglected "R": The Need for a Writing RevolutionEducational Studies, 36
This study examines the relationship between students’ demographic background and their experiences with writing at school, the alignment between state and National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) direct writing assessments, and students’ NAEP writing performance. The study utilizes primary data collection via content analysis of writing assessment prompts and rubrics and secondary analysis with NAEP data through hierarchical linear modeling. Results indicate students from states with writing tests more similar to the NAEP do not perform significantly better than students from states with writing tests less similar to the NAEP. Rather, student demographic characteristics, including gender, ethnicity, SES, disability status, and English learner status significantly predict NAEP writing performance, as do factors related to frequency of writing across subject areas, frequency of writing for varied purposes, frequency of writing process use, and computer use in writing. The implications of the findings for writing instruction are discussed.
Reading and Writing – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 12, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.