Potentially inappropriate medication in palliative care patients according to STOPP-Frail criteria

Potentially inappropriate medication in palliative care patients according to STOPP-Frail criteria Background Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are common in palliative care patients, but no specific tools have been used to determine these PIMs. Objective To evaluate the prevalence of PIMs according to specific tool ‘STOPP-Frail’, related factors with its existence and clinical consequences. Methods This is a post hoc analysis from a 10-month prospective cross-sectional study. Upon hospital admission in an acute geriatric unit (AGU), demographic and pharmacological data were collected to determine related associated factors. The main outcome was prevalence and type of PIMs (by STOPP-Frail criteria). Measured clinical outcomes were adverse drug events, length of stay, location upon discharge, in-hospital mortality and 1-year survival. Results Two hundred thirty-five patients (mean age 86.80; 65.50% women) were recruited. Overall, 67.2% of patients had ≥ 1 criterion (mainly ‘drugs without clinical indication’ due to alimentary tract and metabolism drugs). Related factors associated with PIMs according to STOPP-Frail criteria were moderate polypharmacy (OR 7.16 CI 95% 2.27–22.52) and excessive polypharmacy (OR 7.30 CI 95% 2.34–22.73), but not advanced age (OR 0.26 CI 95% 0.12–0.53) or previous hospitalisations (OR 0.61 CI 95% 0.48–0.79). There were no differences in clinical outcomes. Conclusion PIMs according to STOPP-Frail are often used in palliative care patients. PIMs http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Geriatric Medicine Springer Journals

Potentially inappropriate medication in palliative care patients according to STOPP-Frail criteria

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/potentially-inappropriate-medication-in-palliative-care-patients-2Tw68fm8Mo
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by European Geriatric Medicine Society
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Geriatrics/Gerontology; Internal Medicine
eISSN
1878-7657
D.O.I.
10.1007/s41999-018-0073-z
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Background Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are common in palliative care patients, but no specific tools have been used to determine these PIMs. Objective To evaluate the prevalence of PIMs according to specific tool ‘STOPP-Frail’, related factors with its existence and clinical consequences. Methods This is a post hoc analysis from a 10-month prospective cross-sectional study. Upon hospital admission in an acute geriatric unit (AGU), demographic and pharmacological data were collected to determine related associated factors. The main outcome was prevalence and type of PIMs (by STOPP-Frail criteria). Measured clinical outcomes were adverse drug events, length of stay, location upon discharge, in-hospital mortality and 1-year survival. Results Two hundred thirty-five patients (mean age 86.80; 65.50% women) were recruited. Overall, 67.2% of patients had ≥ 1 criterion (mainly ‘drugs without clinical indication’ due to alimentary tract and metabolism drugs). Related factors associated with PIMs according to STOPP-Frail criteria were moderate polypharmacy (OR 7.16 CI 95% 2.27–22.52) and excessive polypharmacy (OR 7.30 CI 95% 2.34–22.73), but not advanced age (OR 0.26 CI 95% 0.12–0.53) or previous hospitalisations (OR 0.61 CI 95% 0.48–0.79). There were no differences in clinical outcomes. Conclusion PIMs according to STOPP-Frail are often used in palliative care patients. PIMs

Journal

European Geriatric MedicineSpringer Journals

Published: May 30, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off