Pore Sealing on Si(001) and Si(111) in Homoepitaxy and Annealing: A Monte Carlo Simulation

Pore Sealing on Si(001) and Si(111) in Homoepitaxy and Annealing: A Monte Carlo Simulation A Monte Carlo simulation is reported of (i) the homoepitaxial growth of a continuous film on porous Si(111) and Si(001) surfaces and (ii) high-temperature annealing of a porous-silicon substrate. The simulation is based on a 3D model for diamond-type crystals. It is shown that homoepitaxy produces a smooth film on a (111) surface, whereas the film on a (001) surface shows {111} tetrahedral pits. It is found that the minimum deposited dose required for pore sealing is much lower for a (111) surface; this is true of all temperatures, deposition rates, and porosities considered. The difference in surface morphology between the two films is attributed to the influence of surface orientation on adatom migration. The variation is examined of pore penetration depth with respect to epitaxy conditions and porosity. Structural changes under annealing are investigated in the Si(001) case. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Russian Microelectronics Springer Journals

Pore Sealing on Si(001) and Si(111) in Homoepitaxy and Annealing: A Monte Carlo Simulation

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/pore-sealing-on-si-001-and-si-111-in-homoepitaxy-and-annealing-a-monte-Axfa0vXHqj
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica”
Subject
Engineering; Electrical Engineering
ISSN
1063-7397
eISSN
1608-3415
D.O.I.
10.1023/B:RUMI.0000026170.83811.d6
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

A Monte Carlo simulation is reported of (i) the homoepitaxial growth of a continuous film on porous Si(111) and Si(001) surfaces and (ii) high-temperature annealing of a porous-silicon substrate. The simulation is based on a 3D model for diamond-type crystals. It is shown that homoepitaxy produces a smooth film on a (111) surface, whereas the film on a (001) surface shows {111} tetrahedral pits. It is found that the minimum deposited dose required for pore sealing is much lower for a (111) surface; this is true of all temperatures, deposition rates, and porosities considered. The difference in surface morphology between the two films is attributed to the influence of surface orientation on adatom migration. The variation is examined of pore penetration depth with respect to epitaxy conditions and porosity. Structural changes under annealing are investigated in the Si(001) case.

Journal

Russian MicroelectronicsSpringer Journals

Published: Oct 18, 2004

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off