Policy sciences and democracy: a reexamination

Policy sciences and democracy: a reexamination Policy Sci (2017) 50:339–350 DOI 10.1007/s11077-017-9291-3 EDITORIAL N OTE Douglas Torgerson Published online: 24 July 2017 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017 The public, well, the dear public can be bamboozled with phrases. –Harold D. Lasswell, 1924 The paradox of Policy Sciences Policy Sciences has, since the inception of the journal, been beset by an apparent paradox. Even though its keynote has been diversity, the journal has also been animated by a central theoretical orientation. The accent on diversity was already evident in E. S. Quade’s inaugural editorial, which promised ‘contributions reflecting all aspects of the policy sciences in all forms—think pieces, case studies, ideological essays, tirades, and historical surveys’ (1970: 2). Yet, how can such diversity be congruent with a central theoretical orientation? The paradox can be resolved if we recognize that the theoretical orientation which inspired the formation of the journal has a need for diversity at its core. This need for diversity—principally of perspectives and experiences—is notable in what Brunner and Willard have called, ‘central theory’ (2003: 4–8) in reference to the framework for the policy sciences conceived by Harold D. Lasswell. To reexamine here the relationship between policy sciences and democracy (cf. Dryzek and Torgerson 1993), http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Policy Sciences Springer Journals

Policy sciences and democracy: a reexamination

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/policy-sciences-and-democracy-a-reexamination-TUxuxlIkdY
Publisher
Springer US
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
Subject
Political Science and International Relations; Political Science; Economic Policy; Public Administration
ISSN
0032-2687
eISSN
1573-0891
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11077-017-9291-3
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Policy Sci (2017) 50:339–350 DOI 10.1007/s11077-017-9291-3 EDITORIAL N OTE Douglas Torgerson Published online: 24 July 2017 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017 The public, well, the dear public can be bamboozled with phrases. –Harold D. Lasswell, 1924 The paradox of Policy Sciences Policy Sciences has, since the inception of the journal, been beset by an apparent paradox. Even though its keynote has been diversity, the journal has also been animated by a central theoretical orientation. The accent on diversity was already evident in E. S. Quade’s inaugural editorial, which promised ‘contributions reflecting all aspects of the policy sciences in all forms—think pieces, case studies, ideological essays, tirades, and historical surveys’ (1970: 2). Yet, how can such diversity be congruent with a central theoretical orientation? The paradox can be resolved if we recognize that the theoretical orientation which inspired the formation of the journal has a need for diversity at its core. This need for diversity—principally of perspectives and experiences—is notable in what Brunner and Willard have called, ‘central theory’ (2003: 4–8) in reference to the framework for the policy sciences conceived by Harold D. Lasswell. To reexamine here the relationship between policy sciences and democracy (cf. Dryzek and Torgerson 1993),

Journal

Policy SciencesSpringer Journals

Published: Jul 24, 2017

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off