Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Police Evaluations of Intimate Partner Violence in Heterosexual and Same-Sex Relationships: Do Experience and Training Play a Role?

Police Evaluations of Intimate Partner Violence in Heterosexual and Same-Sex Relationships: Do... In recent years, law enforcement agencies have enhanced intimate partner violence (IPV) policies and increased the frequency of required training. Yet, there is limited research that addresses how experience and training are related to evaluations of heterosexual and same-sex disputants in an IPV incident. This research investigates how officers perceive heterosexual and same-sex disputants in IPV incidents and examines how officer experience, frequency, and recency of required IPV training affect evaluations. Law enforcement officers (n = 309) across 27 states responded to a hypothetical scenario of an IPV incident between a heterosexual or same-sex couple. Dependent variables included perpetrator and victim arrest, perceived fairness of non-arrest options, willingness to provide referrals for perpetrator and victim, and severity of victim injury. Officers believed that the use of some non-arrest options was fairer when the perpetrator was a gay male or heterosexual female and there were no significant effects for arrest options. Referrals to a domestic violence hotline and injury severity varied by perpetrator and victim gender and sexual orientation. While officer experience played a role in non-arrest options, frequency and recency of officer training were not related to dependent variables of interest. Officers embrace evaluations of IPV that demonstrate differential evaluations of the incident as a result of gender and sexual orientation. These evaluations may have implications for the legitimacy of claims and safety and justice for victims and officers. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Springer Journals

Police Evaluations of Intimate Partner Violence in Heterosexual and Same-Sex Relationships: Do Experience and Training Play a Role?

Download PDF
11 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/police-evaluations-of-intimate-partner-violence-in-heterosexual-and-6LYdhodb5Q
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Society for Police and Criminal Psychology
Subject
Psychology; Psychology, general; Law and Psychology; Criminology and Criminal Justice, general
ISSN
0882-0783
eISSN
1936-6469
DOI
10.1007/s11896-018-9279-8
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In recent years, law enforcement agencies have enhanced intimate partner violence (IPV) policies and increased the frequency of required training. Yet, there is limited research that addresses how experience and training are related to evaluations of heterosexual and same-sex disputants in an IPV incident. This research investigates how officers perceive heterosexual and same-sex disputants in IPV incidents and examines how officer experience, frequency, and recency of required IPV training affect evaluations. Law enforcement officers (n = 309) across 27 states responded to a hypothetical scenario of an IPV incident between a heterosexual or same-sex couple. Dependent variables included perpetrator and victim arrest, perceived fairness of non-arrest options, willingness to provide referrals for perpetrator and victim, and severity of victim injury. Officers believed that the use of some non-arrest options was fairer when the perpetrator was a gay male or heterosexual female and there were no significant effects for arrest options. Referrals to a domestic violence hotline and injury severity varied by perpetrator and victim gender and sexual orientation. While officer experience played a role in non-arrest options, frequency and recency of officer training were not related to dependent variables of interest. Officers embrace evaluations of IPV that demonstrate differential evaluations of the incident as a result of gender and sexual orientation. These evaluations may have implications for the legitimacy of claims and safety and justice for victims and officers.

Journal

Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology – Springer Journals

Published: Jun 1, 2018

References

  • Sexual orientation bias crimes. Examination of reporting, perception of police bias, and differential police response
    Briones-Robinson, R; Powers, RA; Socia, KM
  • Determining police response to domestic violence victims
    Buzawa, E; Austin, T
  • Washington DC: national institute of justice
    Buzawa, E; Hotaling, G
  • Barriers to help seeking for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer survivors of intimate partner violence
    Calton, JM; Cattaneo, LB; Gebbhard, KT
  • Do you see what I see? The influence of gender stereotypes on student and Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) perceptions of violent same-sex and opposite- sex relationships
    Cormier, N; Woodworth, M
  • Intimate partner violence among sexual minority populations: a critical review of the literature and agenda for future research
    Edwards, KM; Sylaska, KM; Neal, AM
  • Public officials and a “private” matter: evaluations and policies in the county sheriff office regarding violence against women
    Farris, EM; Holman, MR
  • The influence of gender and mental state on police decisions in domestic assault cases
    Finn, MA; Stalans, LJ
  • Intimate partner violence among men who have sex with men a systematic review
    Finneran, C; Stephenson, R
  • “I wasn’t a priority, I wasn’t a victim”: challenges in help seeking for transgender survivors of intimate partner violence
    Guadelupe-Diaz, XL; Jasinski, J
  • Informal institutions and comparative politics: a research agenda
    Helmke, G; Levitsky, S
  • Police subculture revisited
    Herbert, S
  • When arrest is not an arrest: exceptionally clearing cases of intimate partner violence
    Hirschel, D; Faggiani, D
  • The development of the brief spousal assault form for the evaluation of risk (B-safer): a tool for criminal justice professionals
    Kropp, PR; Hart, SD
  • Police evaluations toward domestic violence offenders
    Logan, TK; Shannon, L; Walker, R
  • The helping hand of the law: police control of citizens on request
    Mastrofski, SD; Snipes, JB; Parks, RB; Maxwell, CD
  • Invisible victims: same sex IPV in the National Violence against Women Survey
    Messinger, AM
  • LGBTI variations in crime reporting: how sexual identity influences decisions to call the cops
    Miles-Johnson, T
  • Policing transgender people: discretionary police power and th ineffectual aspirations of one Australian police initiative
    Miles-Johnson, T
  • A comparison of the police response to heterosexual versus same-sex intimate partner violence
    Pattavina, A; Hirschel, D; Buzawa, E; Faggiani, D; Bentley, H
  • ‘There oughtta be a law against bitches’: masculinity lessons in police academy training
    Prokos, A; Padavic, I
  • When is it abuse? How assailant gender, sexual orientation, and protections orders influence perceptions of a case of intimate partner abuse
    Russell, B; Chapleau, K; Kraus
  • Responses of police officers to cases of officer domestic violence: effects of demographic and professional factors
    Saunders, DG; Prost, SG; Oehme, K
  • How novice and experienced officers interpret wife assaults: normative and efficiency frames
    Stalans, LJ; Finn, MA
  • The influence of victim vulnerability and gender on police officers’ assessment of intimate partner violence risk
    Storey, JE; Strand, S
  • Same-sex domestic violence: why victims are more at risk
    Tesch, BP; Bekerian, D; English, P; Harrington, E
  • Police response to domestic violence: making decisions about risk and risk management
    Trujillo, MP; Ross, S