Points of view: Why male cannibalism won't cause a female-biased OSR -- a comment on Smith and Wootton's paper

Points of view: Why male cannibalism won't cause a female-biased OSR -- a comment on Smith and... Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 8, 93±98 (1998) Points of view Why male cannibalism won't cause a female- biased OSR ± a comment on Smith and Wootton's paper CH ARLOTTA K VA RNEMO Department of Zoology, the University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia Keywords: brood cannibalism, operational sex ratio, sexual selection Smith and Wootton (1995) dealt with cannibalism in ®sh, in relation to a model by Clutton-Brock and Parker (1992) on operational sex ratio (OSR). Here I comment on Smith and Wootton's paper, and explain why I disagree with some of their conclusions. Firstly, however, to provide a theoretical background to my arguments, I will summarise Clutton-Brock and Parker's model (1992) and explain some applications of OSR. The concept of OSR (the ratio of males to females ready to mate), ®rst discussed by Emlen and Oring (1977), is a central tool in explaining variation in sex-roles and intensity in mating competition (Clutton-Brock and Parker, 1992; Andersson, 1994; Andersson and Iwasa, 1996; Reynolds, 1996). In recent years, this concept has become prominent in empirical studies and has received considerable theoretical attention (Clutton-Brock and Vincent, 1991; Clutton-Brock and Parker, 1992; Owens and Thompson, 1994; Parker and Simmons, 1996). http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries Springer Journals

Points of view: Why male cannibalism won't cause a female-biased OSR -- a comment on Smith and Wootton's paper

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/points-of-view-why-male-cannibalism-won-t-cause-a-female-biased-osr-a-LRDZlU6DVp
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by Chapman and Hall
Subject
Life Sciences; Freshwater & Marine Ecology; Zoology
ISSN
0960-3166
eISSN
1573-5184
D.O.I.
10.1023/A:1008816601559
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 8, 93±98 (1998) Points of view Why male cannibalism won't cause a female- biased OSR ± a comment on Smith and Wootton's paper CH ARLOTTA K VA RNEMO Department of Zoology, the University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia Keywords: brood cannibalism, operational sex ratio, sexual selection Smith and Wootton (1995) dealt with cannibalism in ®sh, in relation to a model by Clutton-Brock and Parker (1992) on operational sex ratio (OSR). Here I comment on Smith and Wootton's paper, and explain why I disagree with some of their conclusions. Firstly, however, to provide a theoretical background to my arguments, I will summarise Clutton-Brock and Parker's model (1992) and explain some applications of OSR. The concept of OSR (the ratio of males to females ready to mate), ®rst discussed by Emlen and Oring (1977), is a central tool in explaining variation in sex-roles and intensity in mating competition (Clutton-Brock and Parker, 1992; Andersson, 1994; Andersson and Iwasa, 1996; Reynolds, 1996). In recent years, this concept has become prominent in empirical studies and has received considerable theoretical attention (Clutton-Brock and Vincent, 1991; Clutton-Brock and Parker, 1992; Owens and Thompson, 1994; Parker and Simmons, 1996).

Journal

Reviews in Fish Biology and FisheriesSpringer Journals

Published: Oct 6, 2004

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off