Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 7, 365±370 (1997) Points of view The trouble with ®sheries science! GE OR GE A. RO SE Chair of Fisheries Conservation, Fisheries and Marine Institute, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NF, Canada A1C 5R3. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org Marine ®sheries management has passed through turbulent times in the past decade (Royce, 1996). Management has been unable to sustain ®sheries and curb population declines in commercial species in many jurisdictions (Hannesson, 1996). Although management dif®culties often stem from unrealistic visions of `managing' marine resources in dynamic ocean systems, with biological goals compromised by political, economic and social considerations, the failure of ®sheries science and scienti®c institutions to provide adequate stock information upon which to base management must be acknowledged (Finlayson, 1994; Walters and Maguire, 1996). Several recent publications examined ®sheries science problems (Parsons and Seki, 1995; Parsons, 1996; Ulltang, 1996; Walters and Maguire, 1996). In general, these authors suggest that in past decades, ®sheries science has lost touch with the realities of ®sheries, management and ocean ecosystem dynamics. Much of this can be attributed to an obsession with quantitative methods, which relegated these realities, and ecological science, to the back burner, and spawned unwarranted faith
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 22, 2004
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud