PIP breast implant rupture—A retrospective study from Portugal

PIP breast implant rupture—A retrospective study from Portugal Eur J Plast Surg (2015) 38:301–308 DOI 10.1007/s00238-015-1071-8 ORIGINAL PAPER Diana Costa Santos & Maria da Luz Barroso & Nuno Gomes & Nilza Ramião & Pedro Martins & Cláudia Camila Dias & Horácio Costa Received: 7 July 2014 /Accepted: 8 February 2015 /Published online: 3 March 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 Abstract However, within ruptured implants, 88.2 % were PIP Background Silicone breast implants have been used for cos- and 11.8 % were not, and this difference was statistical- metic and reconstructive breast surgery for several decades. ly significant. Parameters such as subglandular vs. Rupture and silicone leakage are well-known complications retromuscular plane, shape or volume were not signifi- for silicone mammary implants. However, in the last years, an cantly correlated with rupture. About the concordance unexpected high prevalence of rupture and silicone leakage between imaging diagnosis and intraoperative finding have been reported for the Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) man- of implant rupture, we found that magnetic resonance ufacturer, which culminated in the withdrawal of these im- imaging was superior to the ultrasound. plants from the European market in 2010. Conclusions We have detected a higher prevalence of rupture Methods In order to analyze rupture in PIP breast im- http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Journals

PIP breast implant rupture—A retrospective study from Portugal

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/pip-breast-implant-rupture-a-retrospective-study-from-portugal-p0pxfLgnVt
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Plastic Surgery
ISSN
0930-343X
eISSN
1435-0130
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00238-015-1071-8
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Eur J Plast Surg (2015) 38:301–308 DOI 10.1007/s00238-015-1071-8 ORIGINAL PAPER Diana Costa Santos & Maria da Luz Barroso & Nuno Gomes & Nilza Ramião & Pedro Martins & Cláudia Camila Dias & Horácio Costa Received: 7 July 2014 /Accepted: 8 February 2015 /Published online: 3 March 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 Abstract However, within ruptured implants, 88.2 % were PIP Background Silicone breast implants have been used for cos- and 11.8 % were not, and this difference was statistical- metic and reconstructive breast surgery for several decades. ly significant. Parameters such as subglandular vs. Rupture and silicone leakage are well-known complications retromuscular plane, shape or volume were not signifi- for silicone mammary implants. However, in the last years, an cantly correlated with rupture. About the concordance unexpected high prevalence of rupture and silicone leakage between imaging diagnosis and intraoperative finding have been reported for the Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) man- of implant rupture, we found that magnetic resonance ufacturer, which culminated in the withdrawal of these im- imaging was superior to the ultrasound. plants from the European market in 2010. Conclusions We have detected a higher prevalence of rupture Methods In order to analyze rupture in PIP breast im-

Journal

European Journal of Plastic SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Mar 3, 2015

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off