Party Polarization and Party Structuring of Policy Attitudes: A Comparison of Three NES Panel Studies

Party Polarization and Party Structuring of Policy Attitudes: A Comparison of Three NES Panel... The conventional wisdom in the partisan change literature predicts that increasing party conflict on one issue agenda leads to a decline in party conflict on another agenda—a process called “conflict displacement.” We have argued that recent party politics in the United States has experienced “conflict extension,” with the Democratic and Republican parties in the electorate growing more polarized on cultural, racial, and social welfare issues, rather than conflict displacement. Here, we suggest that the failure of the literature to account for conflict extension results from incomplete assumptions about individual-level partisan change. The partisan change literature typically considers only issue-based change in party identification, which necessarily leads to the aggregate prediction of conflict displacement. This ignores the possibility of party-based change in issue attitudes. If party-based issue conversion does occur, the aggregate result can be conflict extension rather than conflict displacement. Our analysis uses data from the three-wave panel studies conducted by the National Election Studies in 1956, 1958, and 1960; in 1972, 1974, and 1976; and in 1992, 1994, and 1996 to assess our alternative account of individual-level partisan change. We show that when Democratic and Republican elites are polarized on an issue, and party identifiers are aware of those differences, some individuals respond by adjusting their party ties to conform to their issue positions, but others respond by adjusting their issue positions to conform to their party identification. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Political Behavior Springer Journals

Party Polarization and Party Structuring of Policy Attitudes: A Comparison of Three NES Panel Studies

38 pages
Read Article

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/party-polarization-and-party-structuring-of-policy-attitudes-a-Ti4qIrMHSF
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 by Plenum Publishing Corporation
Subject
Political Science and International Relations; Political Science; Sociology, general
ISSN
0190-9320
eISSN
1573-6687
D.O.I.
10.1023/A:1021820523983
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The conventional wisdom in the partisan change literature predicts that increasing party conflict on one issue agenda leads to a decline in party conflict on another agenda—a process called “conflict displacement.” We have argued that recent party politics in the United States has experienced “conflict extension,” with the Democratic and Republican parties in the electorate growing more polarized on cultural, racial, and social welfare issues, rather than conflict displacement. Here, we suggest that the failure of the literature to account for conflict extension results from incomplete assumptions about individual-level partisan change. The partisan change literature typically considers only issue-based change in party identification, which necessarily leads to the aggregate prediction of conflict displacement. This ignores the possibility of party-based change in issue attitudes. If party-based issue conversion does occur, the aggregate result can be conflict extension rather than conflict displacement. Our analysis uses data from the three-wave panel studies conducted by the National Election Studies in 1956, 1958, and 1960; in 1972, 1974, and 1976; and in 1992, 1994, and 1996 to assess our alternative account of individual-level partisan change. We show that when Democratic and Republican elites are polarized on an issue, and party identifiers are aware of those differences, some individuals respond by adjusting their party ties to conform to their issue positions, but others respond by adjusting their issue positions to conform to their party identification.

Journal

Political Behavior – Springer Journals

Published: Oct 10, 2004

References

  • Issue evolution reconsidered: racial attitudes and partisanship in the U.S. electorate
    Abramowitz, A. I.
  • Ideological realignment in the U.S. electorate
    Abramowitz, A. I.; Saunders, K. L.
  • Understanding Public Opinion
    Abramowitz, A. I.; Saunders, K. L.
  • The Creation of a Democratic Majority, 1928-1936
    Andersen, K.
  • Maximum likelihood estimates for a multivariate normal distribution when some observations are missing
    Andersen, T. W.
  • Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures
    Bentler, P. M.; Bonett, D. G.
  • Sample size and Bentler and Bonett's nonnormed fit index
    Bollen, K. A.
  • A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models
    Bollen, K. A.
  • Structural Equations with Latent Variables
    Bollen, K. A.
  • Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era
    Bond, J. R.; Fleisher, R.
  • The American Voter
    Campbell, A.; Converse, P. E.; Miller, W. E.; Stokes, D. E.
  • The logic of party alignments
    Carmines, E. G.
  • Controversies in Voting Behavior
    Carmines, E. G.; Renten, S. H.; Stimson, J. A.
  • Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics
    Carmines, E. G.; Stimson, J. A.
  • A dynamic model of political change among party activists
    Carsey, T. M.; Layman, G. C.
  • Partisan Realignment
    Clubb, J. M.; Flanigan, W. H.; Zingale, N. H.
  • Ideology and Discontent
    Converse, P. E.
  • Plus ca change...: the new CPS election study panel
    Converse, P. E.; Markus, G. B.
  • Statistical Models for the Social and Behavioral Sciences
    Dwyer, J. H.
  • The 1928-1936 partisan realignment: the case for the conversion hypothesis
    Erikson, R. S.; Tedin, K. L.
  • Causal Analysis with Panel Data
    Finkel, S. E.
  • Endogenous preferences and the study of institutions
    Gerber, E. R.; Jackson, J. E.
  • Of artifacts and partisan instability
    Green, D. P.; Palmquist, B.
  • The crosswinds of change: sources of change in the Democratic and Republican parties
    Herrera, R.
  • Resurgent mass partisanship: the role of elite polarization
    Hetherington, M. J.
  • Partisan representation and the failure of realignment in the 1980s
    Hurley, P. A.
  • Partisan representation, realignment, and the Senate in the 1980s
    Hurley, P. A.
  • A theory of critical elections
    Key, V. O.
  • Stratification and the dimensions of American political orientations
    Knoke, D.
  • The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politics
    Layman, G. C.
  • Why do party activists convert? An analysis of individual-level change on the abortion issue
    Layman, G. C.; Carsey, T. M.
  • Party polarization and “conflict extension” in the American electorate
    Layman, G. C.; Carsey, T. M.
  • A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice
    Markus, G. B.; Converse, P. E.
  • Temporal order and causal inference
    Miller, W. E.
  • The Changing American Voter
    Nie, N. H.; Verba, S.; Petrocik, J. R.
  • Reciprocal effects of policy preferences, party loyalties and the vote
    Page, B. I.; Jones, C. C.
  • Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting
    Poole, K. T.; Rosenthal, H.
  • The Decline and Fall of the Liberal Republicans: from 1952 to the Present
    Rae, N. C.
  • A model for disaggregating political change
    Rapoport, R. B.; Stone, W. J.
  • Liberalism Against Populism
    Riker, W. H.
  • Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House
    Rohde, D. W.
  • The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America
    Schattschneider, E. E.
  • Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology
    Sniderman, P. M.; Brody, R. A.; Tetlock, P. E.
  • The Scar of Race
    Sniderman, P. M.; Piazza, T.
  • The Parties Respond
    Stone, W. J.; Rapoport, R. B.; Abramowitz, A. I.
  • Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States
    Sundquist, J. L.
  • The estimation of measurement error in panel data
    Wiley, D. E.; Wiley, J. A.
  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
    Zaller, J.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.

Try 2 weeks free now

DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

or browse the journals available

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off

Sign up
for free
Start 14 day
Free Trial