Parent and Teacher Identification of Children at Risk of Developing Internalizing or Externalizing Mental Health Problems: A Comparison of Screening Methods

Parent and Teacher Identification of Children at Risk of Developing Internalizing or... The accuracy of screening methods for predicting children's internalizing, externalizing, or total behavior problems by 1-year follow-up were compared. Parents and teachers completed two screening measures each: a measure of exposure to multiple family risk factors (the Family Risk Factor Checklist: FRFC) and a simple nomination question of child risk status, which involved informants answering one question concerning whether they believed a child was at higher risk than average of developing a mental health problem in the future. Both parents and teachers were more accurate at identifying children at risk of externalizing than internalizing disorders. For parents, the FRFC showed similar sensitivity to simple nomination as a screen for predicting later total behavior problems, lower sensitivity for internalizing problems, and there was a nonsignificant trend for the FRFC to have higher sensitivity for externalizing problems than simple nomination. The specificity of simple nomination was somewhat higher than that of the FRFC for all three mental health outcomes. For teachers, simple nomination showed higher sensitivity than the FRFC for predicting internalizing, externalizing, and total behavior problems, but the difference was nonsignificant for internalizing problems. The specificity for both teacher screens was similar across mental health outcomes. For a population base rate of externalizing problems of 13%, teacher nominations for children at risk of externalizing problems had a sensitivity of 69%, specificity of 78%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 32%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 94%. Teacher nominations of at-risk children had greater predictive accuracy than parent nominations. The simple nomination method shows promise as a cost-efficient screen. When screening children who did not yet have behavioral symptoms, both parent and teacher measures resulted in substantial misclassification errors. However, the use of these screening measures at a population level could benefit large numbers of children who subsequently receive selective preventive interventions. Prevention Science Springer Journals

Parent and Teacher Identification of Children at Risk of Developing Internalizing or Externalizing Mental Health Problems: A Comparison of Screening Methods

Loading next page...
Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
Copyright © 2006 by Society of Prevention Research
Medicine & Public Health; Public Health; Health Psychology; Child and School Psychology
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site


You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.

DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches


Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.



billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial