Parent and Teacher Identification of Children at Risk of Developing Internalizing or Externalizing Mental Health Problems: A Comparison of Screening Methods

Parent and Teacher Identification of Children at Risk of Developing Internalizing or... The accuracy of screening methods for predicting children's internalizing, externalizing, or total behavior problems by 1-year follow-up were compared. Parents and teachers completed two screening measures each: a measure of exposure to multiple family risk factors (the Family Risk Factor Checklist: FRFC) and a simple nomination question of child risk status, which involved informants answering one question concerning whether they believed a child was at higher risk than average of developing a mental health problem in the future. Both parents and teachers were more accurate at identifying children at risk of externalizing than internalizing disorders. For parents, the FRFC showed similar sensitivity to simple nomination as a screen for predicting later total behavior problems, lower sensitivity for internalizing problems, and there was a nonsignificant trend for the FRFC to have higher sensitivity for externalizing problems than simple nomination. The specificity of simple nomination was somewhat higher than that of the FRFC for all three mental health outcomes. For teachers, simple nomination showed higher sensitivity than the FRFC for predicting internalizing, externalizing, and total behavior problems, but the difference was nonsignificant for internalizing problems. The specificity for both teacher screens was similar across mental health outcomes. For a population base rate of externalizing problems of 13%, teacher nominations for children at risk of externalizing problems had a sensitivity of 69%, specificity of 78%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 32%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 94%. Teacher nominations of at-risk children had greater predictive accuracy than parent nominations. The simple nomination method shows promise as a cost-efficient screen. When screening children who did not yet have behavioral symptoms, both parent and teacher measures resulted in substantial misclassification errors. However, the use of these screening measures at a population level could benefit large numbers of children who subsequently receive selective preventive interventions. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Prevention Science Springer Journals

Parent and Teacher Identification of Children at Risk of Developing Internalizing or Externalizing Mental Health Problems: A Comparison of Screening Methods

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/parent-and-teacher-identification-of-children-at-risk-of-developing-0ztHuMdjwd
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by Society of Prevention Research
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Public Health; Health Psychology; Child and School Psychology
ISSN
1389-4986
eISSN
1573-6695
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11121-006-0026-5
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The accuracy of screening methods for predicting children's internalizing, externalizing, or total behavior problems by 1-year follow-up were compared. Parents and teachers completed two screening measures each: a measure of exposure to multiple family risk factors (the Family Risk Factor Checklist: FRFC) and a simple nomination question of child risk status, which involved informants answering one question concerning whether they believed a child was at higher risk than average of developing a mental health problem in the future. Both parents and teachers were more accurate at identifying children at risk of externalizing than internalizing disorders. For parents, the FRFC showed similar sensitivity to simple nomination as a screen for predicting later total behavior problems, lower sensitivity for internalizing problems, and there was a nonsignificant trend for the FRFC to have higher sensitivity for externalizing problems than simple nomination. The specificity of simple nomination was somewhat higher than that of the FRFC for all three mental health outcomes. For teachers, simple nomination showed higher sensitivity than the FRFC for predicting internalizing, externalizing, and total behavior problems, but the difference was nonsignificant for internalizing problems. The specificity for both teacher screens was similar across mental health outcomes. For a population base rate of externalizing problems of 13%, teacher nominations for children at risk of externalizing problems had a sensitivity of 69%, specificity of 78%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 32%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 94%. Teacher nominations of at-risk children had greater predictive accuracy than parent nominations. The simple nomination method shows promise as a cost-efficient screen. When screening children who did not yet have behavioral symptoms, both parent and teacher measures resulted in substantial misclassification errors. However, the use of these screening measures at a population level could benefit large numbers of children who subsequently receive selective preventive interventions.

Journal

Prevention ScienceSpringer Journals

Published: Jul 19, 2006

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off