Overdiagnostic uncertainty

Overdiagnostic uncertainty Eur J Epidemiol (2017) 32:533–534 DOI 10.1007/s10654-017-0260-0 CORRESPONDENCE 1,2 Bjørn Hofmann Received: 10 May 2017 / Accepted: 16 May 2017 / Published online: 22 May 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017 There is an intriguing international debate on overdiagnosis. avoid harmful health services and to improve the quality of Alongside with the vast and vivid disputes on the extension care. One reason why the philosophical debate has not yet of overdiagnosis in epidemiology, there are heated philo- provided epidemiology with viable solutions may be the sophical debates on how to define overdiagnosis. The latter complexity of the issue. In particular, it may be that we have debates try to clarify the concept of overdiagnosis so that not paid sufficient attention to the different types of uncer- consensual estimates can be obtained [1], crucial factors tainty at play. In diagnostics the main question is whether the generating overdiagnosis can be identified, and finally, that test is accurate, i.e., whether the test result is correct.In appropriate measures to bar overdiagnosis can be found. overdiagnosis, on the other hand, the question is whether the Despite great progress in the philosophical debate, there (correct) test actually matters to the person. In medicaliza- is http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Epidemiology Springer Journals

Overdiagnostic uncertainty

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/overdiagnostic-uncertainty-W9t0XNyc77
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Epidemiology; Public Health; Infectious Diseases; Cardiology; Oncology
ISSN
0393-2990
eISSN
1573-7284
D.O.I.
10.1007/s10654-017-0260-0
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Eur J Epidemiol (2017) 32:533–534 DOI 10.1007/s10654-017-0260-0 CORRESPONDENCE 1,2 Bjørn Hofmann Received: 10 May 2017 / Accepted: 16 May 2017 / Published online: 22 May 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017 There is an intriguing international debate on overdiagnosis. avoid harmful health services and to improve the quality of Alongside with the vast and vivid disputes on the extension care. One reason why the philosophical debate has not yet of overdiagnosis in epidemiology, there are heated philo- provided epidemiology with viable solutions may be the sophical debates on how to define overdiagnosis. The latter complexity of the issue. In particular, it may be that we have debates try to clarify the concept of overdiagnosis so that not paid sufficient attention to the different types of uncer- consensual estimates can be obtained [1], crucial factors tainty at play. In diagnostics the main question is whether the generating overdiagnosis can be identified, and finally, that test is accurate, i.e., whether the test result is correct.In appropriate measures to bar overdiagnosis can be found. overdiagnosis, on the other hand, the question is whether the Despite great progress in the philosophical debate, there (correct) test actually matters to the person. In medicaliza- is

Journal

European Journal of EpidemiologySpringer Journals

Published: May 22, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off