Outcomes after bariatric surgery according to large databases: a systematic review

Outcomes after bariatric surgery according to large databases: a systematic review Langenbecks Arch Surg (2017) 402:885–899 DOI 10.1007/s00423-017-1613-6 SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND META-ANALYSES Outcomes after bariatric surgery according to large databases: a systematic review 1,2 1,3 1 Andrea Balla & Gabriela Batista Rodríguez & Santiago Corradetti & 1 1 1 Carmen Balagué & Sonia Fernández-Ananín & Eduard M. Targarona Received: 28 March 2017 /Accepted: 27 July 2017 /Published online: 5 August 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 Abstract training (2) and (6) socio-economic and ethnic observations in Purpose The rapid development of technological tools to re- bariatric surgery (7). Forty-two papers were based on data cord data allows storage of enormous datasets, often termed from ACS-NSQIP, nine on data from NIS and three on data Bbig data^. In the USA, three large databases have been de- from MBSAQIP. veloped to store data regarding surgical outcomes: the Conclusions This review provides an overview of surgical American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality management and outcomes of bariatric surgery in the USA. Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP), the Healthcare Cost Large databases offer useful complementary information that and Utilization Project (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample could be considered external validation when strong evidence- (NIS) and the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation based medicine data are lacking. They http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Springer Journals

Outcomes after bariatric surgery according to large databases: a systematic review

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/outcomes-after-bariatric-surgery-according-to-large-databases-a-jCAUCAIc6x
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; General Surgery; Abdominal Surgery; Cardiac Surgery; Thoracic Surgery; Traumatic Surgery; Vascular Surgery
ISSN
1435-2443
eISSN
1435-2451
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00423-017-1613-6
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Langenbecks Arch Surg (2017) 402:885–899 DOI 10.1007/s00423-017-1613-6 SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND META-ANALYSES Outcomes after bariatric surgery according to large databases: a systematic review 1,2 1,3 1 Andrea Balla & Gabriela Batista Rodríguez & Santiago Corradetti & 1 1 1 Carmen Balagué & Sonia Fernández-Ananín & Eduard M. Targarona Received: 28 March 2017 /Accepted: 27 July 2017 /Published online: 5 August 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 Abstract training (2) and (6) socio-economic and ethnic observations in Purpose The rapid development of technological tools to re- bariatric surgery (7). Forty-two papers were based on data cord data allows storage of enormous datasets, often termed from ACS-NSQIP, nine on data from NIS and three on data Bbig data^. In the USA, three large databases have been de- from MBSAQIP. veloped to store data regarding surgical outcomes: the Conclusions This review provides an overview of surgical American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality management and outcomes of bariatric surgery in the USA. Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP), the Healthcare Cost Large databases offer useful complementary information that and Utilization Project (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample could be considered external validation when strong evidence- (NIS) and the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation based medicine data are lacking. They

Journal

Langenbeck's Archives of SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Aug 5, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off