Outcome assessment in plastic surgery—tools, techniques and the future

Outcome assessment in plastic surgery—tools, techniques and the future Eur J Plast Surg (2014) 37:699–700 DOI 10.1007/s00238-014-1005-x LETTER TO THE EDITOR Outcome assessment in plastic surgery—tools, techniques and the future Shehab Jabir Received: 28 June 2014 /Accepted: 24 July 2014 /Published online: 26 August 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014 Sir, statistical analysis with amelioration of the biases inherent in The assessment of outcomes following plastic surgery, apart the techniques employed. from enabling the surgeon to judge the success of a particular The above questions are only some of the considerations operation and enabling him or her to improve their surgical when assessing outcomes within plastic surgery. Historically, practice, also enables the patient to make an informed choice the vast majority of literature assessed outcomes in terms of the complication rates following an operation [1]. This in- about their care. Furthermore, it provides healthcare funders with important information regarding the benefits of an oper- volved the performance of a particular operation for a specific ation. Thus, the accurate measurement of the success of an condition on a number of patients by one or a group of operation is a vital undertaking. surgeons. The complication rate would then be assessed (most Yet, a number of issues lie at the heart http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Journals

Outcome assessment in plastic surgery—tools, techniques and the future

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/outcome-assessment-in-plastic-surgery-tools-techniques-and-the-future-cWTFWccutA
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Plastic Surgery
ISSN
0930-343X
eISSN
1435-0130
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00238-014-1005-x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Eur J Plast Surg (2014) 37:699–700 DOI 10.1007/s00238-014-1005-x LETTER TO THE EDITOR Outcome assessment in plastic surgery—tools, techniques and the future Shehab Jabir Received: 28 June 2014 /Accepted: 24 July 2014 /Published online: 26 August 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014 Sir, statistical analysis with amelioration of the biases inherent in The assessment of outcomes following plastic surgery, apart the techniques employed. from enabling the surgeon to judge the success of a particular The above questions are only some of the considerations operation and enabling him or her to improve their surgical when assessing outcomes within plastic surgery. Historically, practice, also enables the patient to make an informed choice the vast majority of literature assessed outcomes in terms of the complication rates following an operation [1]. This in- about their care. Furthermore, it provides healthcare funders with important information regarding the benefits of an oper- volved the performance of a particular operation for a specific ation. Thus, the accurate measurement of the success of an condition on a number of patients by one or a group of operation is a vital undertaking. surgeons. The complication rate would then be assessed (most Yet, a number of issues lie at the heart

Journal

European Journal of Plastic SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Dec 1, 2014

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off