Orthographic and cognitive factors in the concurrent development of basic reading skills in two languages

Orthographic and cognitive factors in the concurrent development of basic reading skills in two... There is some controversy in the research literature as towhether the development of reading skills in differentorthographies varies primarily as a function of common underlyingcognitive processes (`the central processing hypothesis'), oralternatively, as a function of orthographic transparency (`thescript dependent hypothesis'). These alternative views wereexamined by studying the reading skills of 245 children in grades1--5, learning to read concurrently in English, their firstlanguage (L1) and Hebrew, their second language (L2). Childrenwere administered a non-verbal intelligence task, parallel L1 andL2 memory tasks, and word recognition and pseudoword readingtasks in both languages. Ratings of Hebrew oral proficiency wereprovided by teachers. The central processing hypothesis waspartially supported in that regardless of orthography, memoryexplained a small proportion of the variance on L1 and L2 readingmeasures. Though L2 oral proficiency was a significant predictorof L2 reading, it explained only a small proportion of thevariance. The script dependent hypothesis was supported by thefact that (a) children could read more accurately voweled Hebrew(a `transparent' orthography) than English (a `deep'orthography), (b) the developmental profiles associated withEnglish word recognition and pseudoword decoding was much steeperthan the one depicting Hebrew word recognition and Hebrewpseudoword word decoding, and (c) decoding error categories wereorthography-specific. We conclude that the two alternatives arecomplementary: When the script is less complex young childrenappear to develop their word recognition skills with relativeease, even in the absence of sufficient linguistic proficiency.At the same time, a more accurate picture of what facilitates L1and L2 reading development is enhanced when individualdifferences in underlying cognitive skills are considered aswell. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Reading and Writing Springer Journals

Orthographic and cognitive factors in the concurrent development of basic reading skills in two languages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/orthographic-and-cognitive-factors-in-the-concurrent-development-of-NbuCjevAcJ
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by Kluwer Academic Publishers
Subject
Linguistics; Language and Literature; Psycholinguistics; Education, general; Neurology; Literacy
ISSN
0922-4777
eISSN
1573-0905
D.O.I.
10.1023/A:1008017710115
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

There is some controversy in the research literature as towhether the development of reading skills in differentorthographies varies primarily as a function of common underlyingcognitive processes (`the central processing hypothesis'), oralternatively, as a function of orthographic transparency (`thescript dependent hypothesis'). These alternative views wereexamined by studying the reading skills of 245 children in grades1--5, learning to read concurrently in English, their firstlanguage (L1) and Hebrew, their second language (L2). Childrenwere administered a non-verbal intelligence task, parallel L1 andL2 memory tasks, and word recognition and pseudoword readingtasks in both languages. Ratings of Hebrew oral proficiency wereprovided by teachers. The central processing hypothesis waspartially supported in that regardless of orthography, memoryexplained a small proportion of the variance on L1 and L2 readingmeasures. Though L2 oral proficiency was a significant predictorof L2 reading, it explained only a small proportion of thevariance. The script dependent hypothesis was supported by thefact that (a) children could read more accurately voweled Hebrew(a `transparent' orthography) than English (a `deep'orthography), (b) the developmental profiles associated withEnglish word recognition and pseudoword decoding was much steeperthan the one depicting Hebrew word recognition and Hebrewpseudoword word decoding, and (c) decoding error categories wereorthography-specific. We conclude that the two alternatives arecomplementary: When the script is less complex young childrenappear to develop their word recognition skills with relativeease, even in the absence of sufficient linguistic proficiency.At the same time, a more accurate picture of what facilitates L1and L2 reading development is enhanced when individualdifferences in underlying cognitive skills are considered aswell.

Journal

Reading and WritingSpringer Journals

Published: Oct 7, 2004

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off