Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Wiener, Ryan Winter, Melanie Rogers, L. Arnot (2004)
The Effects of Prior Workplace Behavior on Subsequent Sexual Harassment JudgmentsLaw and Human Behavior, 28
S. Gilliland, D. Steiner (2001)
Causes and consequences of applicant perceptions of unfairness.
Estelle Franklin (1999)
Maneuvering Through the Labryinth: The Employers' Paradox in Responding to Hostile Environment Sexual Harassment —A Proposed Way OutFordham Law Review, 67
Steven Padgitt, Janet Padgitt (1986)
Cognitive Structure of Sexual Harassment: Implications for University Policy.Journal of College Student Personnel, 27
Maria Rotundo, Dung-Hanh Nguyen, P. Sackett (2001)
A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment.The Journal of applied psychology, 86 5
L. Fitzgerald, F. Drasgow, C. Hulin, M. Gelfand, M. Gelfand, V. Magley, V. Magley (1997)
Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: a test of an integrated model.The Journal of applied psychology, 82 4
Laurie Rudman, E. Borgida, B. Robertson (1995)
Suffering in Silence: Procedural Justice Versus Gender Socialization Issues in University Sexual Harassment Grievance ProceduresBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 17
M. O'Connor, B. Gutek, Margaret Stockdale, Tracey Geer, Renée Melançon (2004)
Explaining Sexual Harassment Judgments: Looking Beyond Gender of the RaterLaw and Human Behavior, 28
E. DeSouza, J. Pryor, C. Hutz (1998)
Reactions to Sexual Harassment Charges Between North Americans and BraziliansSex Roles, 39
Jane Adams-Roy, J. Barling (1998)
Predicting the decision to confront or report sexual harassmentJournal of Organizational Behavior, 19
Jeremy Blumenthal (1998)
The Reasonable Woman Standard: A Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Differences in Perceptions of Sexual HarassmentLaw and Human Behavior, 22
J. Williams, L. Fitzgerald, F. Drasgow (1999)
The Effects of Organizational Practices on Sexual Harassment and Individual OutcomesMilitary Psychology
J. Thibaut, L. Walker (1976)
Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis
Allan Lind, John Thibaut, L. Walker, EA Lind, TR Tyler (1988)
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
M. O'Connor (1998)
Gender and the definition of sexual harassment: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature
J. Owens, J. Morgan, G. Gomes (2004)
IMPLEMENTING THE E.U.'S NEW SEXUAL HARASSMENT DIRECTIVE: ARE EMPLOYERS ENTITLED TO A DEFENSE?Journal of Individual Employment Rights, 11
T. Brown (1993)
When Counseling is Not Enough: The Ninth Circuit Requires Employers to Discipline Sexual Harassers: Intlekofer v. Turnage, 973 F.2d 733 (9th Cir. 1992)Washington University Law Review, 71
K. Cummings, Madeline Armenta (2002)
Penalties for Peer Sexual Harassment in an Academic Context: The Influence of Harasser Gender, Participant Gender, Severity of Harassment, and the Presence of BystandersSex Roles, 47
(1997)
Ambient Sexual Harassment: An Integrated Model of Antecedents and Consequences☆☆☆Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71
R. Folger, J. Greenberg (1985)
Research in personnel and human resource management (vol. 3)
S. J. Willert (1998)
Sexual harassment: Defining employers’ rightsFor the Defense, 40
J. Sigal, M. Gibbs, Carl Goodrich, Tayyab Rashid, A. Anjum, D. Hsu, C. Perrino, H. Boratav, Aggie Carson-Arenas, B. Baarsen, J. Pligt, Weizhen Pan (2005)
Cross-Cultural Reactions to Academic Sexual Harassment: Effects of Individualist vs. Collectivist Culture and Gender of ParticipantsSex Roles, 52
S. Kenig, John Ryan (1986)
Sex differences in levels of tolerance and attribution of blame for sexual harassment on a university campusSex Roles, 15
J. B. Pryor, E. R. DeSouza, J. Fitness, C. Hutz, M. Kumpf, K. Lubbert (1997)
Gender differences in the interpretation of social-sexual behavior: A cross-cultural perspective on sexual harassmentJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28
T. D. Brown (1993)
When counseling is not enough: The ninth circuit requires employers to discipline sexual harassersWashington University Law Quarterly, 71
L. Fitzgerald, M. Gelfand, F. Drasgow (1995)
Measuring Sexual Harassment: Theoretical and Psychometric AdvancesBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 17
T. Tyler, Andrew Caine (1981)
The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41
J. Pryor, Janet Giedd, Karen Williams (1995)
A Social Psychological Model for Predicting Sexual HarassmentJournal of Social Issues, 51
V. Magley, C. Hulin, L. Fitzgerald, Megan Denardo (1999)
Outcomes of self-labeling sexual harassment.The Journal of applied psychology, 84 3
Robert Lee, P. Greenlaw (2000)
Employer Liability for Employee Sexual Harassment: A Judicial Policy‐Making StudyPublic Administration Review, 60
J. Salisbury, F. Jaffe (1990)
Sexual harassment on campuses: Abusing the ivory power
Jennifer Berdahl, V. Magley, C. Waldo (1996)
The Sexual Harassment of Men?: Exploring the Concept with Theory and DataPsychology of Women Quarterly, 20
J. H. Williams, L. F. Fitzgerald, F. Drasgow (1999)
The effects of organizational practices on sexual harassment and individual outcomes in the militaryMilitary Psychology, 11
J. Pryor, E. DeSouza, J. Fitness, C. Hutz, M. Kumpf, Karin Lubbert, Outi Pesonen, M. Erber (1997)
Gender Differences in the Interpretation of Social-Sexual BehaviorJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28
E. DeSouza, Solberg (2004)
Women's and Men's Reactions to Man-to-Man Sexual Harassment: Does the Sexual Orientation of the Victim Matter?Sex Roles, 50
L. Fitzgerald, Alayne Ormerod (1991)
Perceptions of Sexual Harassment: The Influence of Gender and Academic ContextPsychology of Women Quarterly, 15
(1980)
Guidelines on discrimination because of sexFederal Register, 45
S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner (2001)
Justice in the workplace: From theory to practice (vol. 2)
Survey data from a student population of experienced workers was used to examine perceptions of organizational responses to sexual harassment. Results revealed significant differences in the perceived seriousness of gender harassment, unwanted sexual attention, and sexual coercion. Moreover, women viewed all three types of harassment as being significantly more serious than men. Terminating perpetrators’ employment, providing a verbal/written reprimand, and mandating an apology were rated as being the most common organizational responses to sexual harassment. A significant positive relationship existed between perceived organizational response severity and effectiveness in combating harassment. Results partially supported the notion that more severe responses are associated with greater effectiveness in communicating organizational intolerance of harassment. Contrary to hypotheses, ratings of organizational response effectiveness and appropriateness were not dependent upon harassment type. Further, organizational responses that involved transferring or reassigning victims were not viewed as less severe punishment for perpetrators than were most responses that involved the perpetrator directly.
Sex Roles – Springer Journals
Published: May 18, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.