Optimal crosscutting: any effect on optimal stand management?

Optimal crosscutting: any effect on optimal stand management? Trees harvested in cuttings are usually partitioned into timber assortments, for instance, saw logs, poles and pulpwood logs. Since different assortments have different prices, the way in which harvested stems are crosscut affects the incomes of the forest landowner. Optimal crosscutting aims at maximizing the total value of the assortments obtained from the stems. Although forest research has developed several algorithms for optimal crosscutting, it has rarely been included in the optimization of stand management. Treatment prescriptions are often based on analyses in which the value of harvested trees is calculated without considering the whole set of timber price categories and without simulating the crosscutting of harvested trees. This may lead to biased conclusions about optimal stand management. This study proposed a fast and flexible method for optimizing the crosscutting of harvested trees in the context of stand management optimization. The method employs simulated annealing to find the optimal combination of log lengths, separately for each harvested tree. The results calculated for case study stands suggest that optimal crosscutting leads to longer rotation lengths than obtained in analyses where the values of harvested trees are predicted with more simple methods. Optimal crosscutting increases the incomes of forest landowner and the proportions of the most valuable saw log assortments. The proportion of harvested pulpwood decreases. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Forest Research Springer Journals

Optimal crosscutting: any effect on optimal stand management?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/optimal-crosscutting-any-effect-on-optimal-stand-management-nKHUxH6VBZ
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
Subject
Life Sciences; Forestry; Plant Sciences; Plant Ecology
ISSN
1612-4669
eISSN
1612-4677
D.O.I.
10.1007/s10342-017-1057-0
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Trees harvested in cuttings are usually partitioned into timber assortments, for instance, saw logs, poles and pulpwood logs. Since different assortments have different prices, the way in which harvested stems are crosscut affects the incomes of the forest landowner. Optimal crosscutting aims at maximizing the total value of the assortments obtained from the stems. Although forest research has developed several algorithms for optimal crosscutting, it has rarely been included in the optimization of stand management. Treatment prescriptions are often based on analyses in which the value of harvested trees is calculated without considering the whole set of timber price categories and without simulating the crosscutting of harvested trees. This may lead to biased conclusions about optimal stand management. This study proposed a fast and flexible method for optimizing the crosscutting of harvested trees in the context of stand management optimization. The method employs simulated annealing to find the optimal combination of log lengths, separately for each harvested tree. The results calculated for case study stands suggest that optimal crosscutting leads to longer rotation lengths than obtained in analyses where the values of harvested trees are predicted with more simple methods. Optimal crosscutting increases the incomes of forest landowner and the proportions of the most valuable saw log assortments. The proportion of harvested pulpwood decreases.

Journal

European Journal of Forest ResearchSpringer Journals

Published: Jun 7, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off