On the relationship between image intensity and velocity in a turbulent boundary layer seeded with smoke particles

On the relationship between image intensity and velocity in a turbulent boundary layer seeded... Simultaneous particle image velocimetry (PIV) and flow visualization measurements were performed in a turbulent boundary layer in an effort to better quantify the relationship between the velocity field and the image intensity typically observed in a classical flow visualization experiment. The freestream flow was lightly seeded with smoke particles to facilitate PIV measurements, whereas the boundary layer was densely seeded with smoke through an upstream slit in the wall to facilitate both PIV and classical flow visualization measurements at Reynolds numbers, Re θ , ranging from 2,100 to 8,600. Measurements were taken with and without the slit covered as well as with and without smoke injection. The addition of a narrow slit in the wall produces a minor modification of the nominal turbulent boundary layer profile whose effect is reduced with downstream distance. The presence of dense smoke in the boundary layer had a minimal effect on the observed velocity field and the associated proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) modes. Analysis of instantaneous images shows that the edge of the turbulent boundary layer identified from flow visualization images generally matches the edge of the boundary layer determined from velocity and vorticity. The correlation between velocity deficit and smoke intensity was determined to be positive and relatively large (>0.7) indicating a moderate-to-strong relationship between the two. This notion was extended further through the use of a direct correlation approach and a complementary POD/linear stochastic estimation (LSE) approach to estimate the velocity field directly from flow visualization images. This exercise showed that, in many cases, velocity fields estimated from smoke intensity were similar to the actual velocity fields. The complementary POD/LSE approach proved better for these estimations, but not enough to suggest using this technique to approximate velocity measurements from a smoke intensity image. Instead, the correlations further validate the use of flow visualization techniques for determining the edge and large-scale shape of a turbulent boundary layer, specifically when quantitative velocity measurements, such as PIV, are not possible in a given experiment. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Experiments in Fluids Springer Journals

On the relationship between image intensity and velocity in a turbulent boundary layer seeded with smoke particles

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/on-the-relationship-between-image-intensity-and-velocity-in-a-Ih1c1Zxfn2
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
Subject
Engineering; Engineering Fluid Dynamics; Fluid- and Aerodynamics; Engineering Thermodynamics, Heat and Mass Transfer
ISSN
0723-4864
eISSN
1432-1114
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00348-014-1681-0
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Simultaneous particle image velocimetry (PIV) and flow visualization measurements were performed in a turbulent boundary layer in an effort to better quantify the relationship between the velocity field and the image intensity typically observed in a classical flow visualization experiment. The freestream flow was lightly seeded with smoke particles to facilitate PIV measurements, whereas the boundary layer was densely seeded with smoke through an upstream slit in the wall to facilitate both PIV and classical flow visualization measurements at Reynolds numbers, Re θ , ranging from 2,100 to 8,600. Measurements were taken with and without the slit covered as well as with and without smoke injection. The addition of a narrow slit in the wall produces a minor modification of the nominal turbulent boundary layer profile whose effect is reduced with downstream distance. The presence of dense smoke in the boundary layer had a minimal effect on the observed velocity field and the associated proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) modes. Analysis of instantaneous images shows that the edge of the turbulent boundary layer identified from flow visualization images generally matches the edge of the boundary layer determined from velocity and vorticity. The correlation between velocity deficit and smoke intensity was determined to be positive and relatively large (>0.7) indicating a moderate-to-strong relationship between the two. This notion was extended further through the use of a direct correlation approach and a complementary POD/linear stochastic estimation (LSE) approach to estimate the velocity field directly from flow visualization images. This exercise showed that, in many cases, velocity fields estimated from smoke intensity were similar to the actual velocity fields. The complementary POD/LSE approach proved better for these estimations, but not enough to suggest using this technique to approximate velocity measurements from a smoke intensity image. Instead, the correlations further validate the use of flow visualization techniques for determining the edge and large-scale shape of a turbulent boundary layer, specifically when quantitative velocity measurements, such as PIV, are not possible in a given experiment.

Journal

Experiments in FluidsSpringer Journals

Published: Feb 9, 2014

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off